← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

qcTAF vs ribd

A side-by-side editorial comparison of qcTAF and ribd — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

qcTAF vs ribd: at a glance

FeatureqcTAFribd
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr, reproducibility, fisheries, quality controlstatistical-genetics, pedigree-analysis, relatedness-coefficients, r-packages
Last editorial update13m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is qcTAF?

qcTAF is building an automated checklist for reproducible fisheries assessments, one criterion at a time

qcTAF performs quality control on TAF (Transparent Assessment Framework) analyses, the workflow standard used for ICES fisheries stock assessments. It launched in February 2026 with eight checking functions and a README listing ten criteria that define a complete TAF analysis. Three releases followed within four months, all adding checks or tightening existing ones.

Read the full qcTAF trajectory →

What is ribd?

The pedsuite's coefficient engine: broadening what it computes, then making the plots publishable.

ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.

Read the full ribd trajectory →

qcTAF vs ribd: editorial side-by-side

Q
qcTAF
ANALYTICS
0.0

qcTAF is building an automated checklist for reproducible fisheries assessments, one criterion at a time

◆ Current state

qcTAF performs quality control on TAF (Transparent Assessment Framework) analyses, the workflow standard used for ICES fisheries stock assessments. It launched in February 2026 with eight checking functions and a README listing ten criteria that define a complete TAF analysis. Three releases followed within four months, all adding checks or tightening existing ones.

◆ Where it's heading

Each release converts more of the informal completeness checklist into executable checks. February added relative-path and script-existence checks; late February added data and software declaration checks plus two new completeness criteria covering initial-versus-boot data identity and DATA.bib declarations; May added qc.any.scripts.exist() and made qc.only.relative.paths() treat /home/ as absolute. Function naming is being revised as the set grows, with renames in every release so far.

◆ Prediction

With the naming churn ongoing and criteria still being added, the next release most likely continues both. The package appears to be tracking a moving definition of TAF completeness rather than a fixed spec.

R
ribd
ANALYTICS
2.5

The pedsuite's coefficient engine: broadening what it computes, then making the plots publishable.

◆ Current state

ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs from generality to presentation to precision. Early releases replaced narrow functions with general ones, most visibly when gKinship() absorbed generalisedKinship() and identityCoefs() superseded the separate autosomal and X-chromosomal identity functions in favour of an Xchrom argument. The middle stretch turned the IBD triangle into a proper plotting surface across three graphics systems. The current phase reads as consolidation, with the newest release listing six bug fixes against four features, several of them alignment errors in output tables, which is where a coefficient library most needs to be exactly right.

◆ Prediction

The two new internal functions in the latest release, inbreedingContributions() and ancestralKinship(), are the kind of thing that surfaces publicly a release or two later, so expect them to become exported decomposition tools. The correctness push through pedigree lists and edge cases suggests the near-term focus stays on hardening rather than new coefficient families.

Alternatives to qcTAF and ribd

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either qcTAF or ribd.

See all qcTAF alternatives → · See all ribd alternatives →

Recent activity from qcTAF and ribd

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 12d agoribdCustom relationships on the IBD triangle; six alignment and edge-case fixes
  2. 2mo agoqcTAFqc.any.scripts.exist() added; /home/ now treated as an absolute path
  3. 5mo agoqcTAFData and software declaration checks; two new completeness criteria
  4. 5mo agoqcTAFRelative path and script existence checks
  5. 5mo agoqcTAFInitial release with eight TAF quality-control checks
  6. 1y agoribdkappaIBD() can skip across-component pairs on large pedigrees
  7. 2y agoribdIBD triangle plots gain ggplot2 and plotly backends, plus inset pedigrees
  8. 3y agoribdTriangle line clipping, automatic plot margins, citation info
  9. 3y agoribdTwo-locus functions overhauled; twoLocusInbreeding and ELR added
  10. 4y agoribdIdentity coefficients unified behind identityCoefs() and an Xchrom argument

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between qcTAF and ribd?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is qcTAF better than ribd?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to qcTAF?

Top qcTAF alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qcTAF alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qctaf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ribd?

Top ribd alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ribd alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ribd for the full list with editorial commentary on each.