← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ieegio vs ribd

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ieegio and ribd — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ieegio vs ribd: at a glance

Featureieegioribd
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr, neuroimaging, ieeg, file formatsstatistical-genetics, pedigree-analysis, relatedness-coefficients, r-packages
Last editorial update26m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ieegio?

ieegio's first release lands electrode trajectory burning and a WebGL-free surface plot

ieegio handles file I/O and volume manipulation for intracranial EEG and neuroimaging data in R. Only one release is on record, 0.1.0 from May 2026, so there is no cadence to read yet. Its content is a mix of new volume-authoring capability and format-level correctness fixes.

Read the full ieegio trajectory →

What is ribd?

The pedsuite's coefficient engine: broadening what it computes, then making the plots publishable.

ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.

Read the full ribd trajectory →

ieegio vs ribd: editorial side-by-side

I
ieegio
ANALYTICS
0.0

ieegio's first release lands electrode trajectory burning and a WebGL-free surface plot

◆ Current state

ieegio handles file I/O and volume manipulation for intracranial EEG and neuroimaging data in R. Only one release is on record, 0.1.0 from May 2026, so there is no cadence to read yet. Its content is a mix of new volume-authoring capability and format-level correctness fixes.

◆ Where it's heading

The release points at two audiences at once: burn_curve() writes electrode trajectories — depth/sEEG leads, DBS shafts — into a volume from start and end positions in native RAS coordinates, with a merge mode so trajectories compost onto an existing volume rather than overwriting it. Separately, a base R graphics plot method for surfaces provides a path for environments without WebGL, where the default r3js renderer cannot run. Format work covers BCI2000 and BrainVision channel lookup by label and a quaternion handedness fix aligning with FreeSurfer conventions.

◆ Prediction

A single release gives no basis for predicting cadence. The FreeSurfer alignment and multi-format channel handling suggest interoperability with established neuroimaging toolchains is the near-term priority.

R
ribd
ANALYTICS
2.5

The pedsuite's coefficient engine: broadening what it computes, then making the plots publishable.

◆ Current state

ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs from generality to presentation to precision. Early releases replaced narrow functions with general ones, most visibly when gKinship() absorbed generalisedKinship() and identityCoefs() superseded the separate autosomal and X-chromosomal identity functions in favour of an Xchrom argument. The middle stretch turned the IBD triangle into a proper plotting surface across three graphics systems. The current phase reads as consolidation, with the newest release listing six bug fixes against four features, several of them alignment errors in output tables, which is where a coefficient library most needs to be exactly right.

◆ Prediction

The two new internal functions in the latest release, inbreedingContributions() and ancestralKinship(), are the kind of thing that surfaces publicly a release or two later, so expect them to become exported decomposition tools. The correctness push through pedigree lists and edge cases suggests the near-term focus stays on hardening rather than new coefficient families.

Alternatives to ieegio and ribd

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ieegio or ribd.

See all ieegio alternatives → · See all ribd alternatives →

Recent activity from ieegio and ribd

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 12d agoribdCustom relationships on the IBD triangle; six alignment and edge-case fixes
  2. 2mo agoieegioburn_curve() writes electrode trajectories into volumes
  3. 1y agoribdkappaIBD() can skip across-component pairs on large pedigrees
  4. 2y agoribdIBD triangle plots gain ggplot2 and plotly backends, plus inset pedigrees
  5. 3y agoribdTriangle line clipping, automatic plot margins, citation info
  6. 3y agoribdTwo-locus functions overhauled; twoLocusInbreeding and ELR added
  7. 4y agoribdIdentity coefficients unified behind identityCoefs() and an Xchrom argument

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ieegio and ribd?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ieegio better than ribd?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ieegio?

Top ieegio alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ieegio alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ieegio for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ribd?

Top ribd alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ribd alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ribd for the full list with editorial commentary on each.