TidyDensity
A distribution catalogue that grows by one family at a time, and rarely breaks anything.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of questionr and singlercapture — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
| Feature | questionr | singlercapture |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Analytics | Analytics |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | survey analysis, contingency tables, rstudio addins, tidyverse compatibility | capture-recapture, population estimation, zero-truncated models, bootstrap |
| Last editorial update | 1h ago | 1h ago |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
questionr's survey helpers are finished; recent releases only keep pace with R-devel.
A long-running toolkit for survey data in R — proportion tables, weighted counts, and the interactive irec(), iorder() and icut() addins for recoding. The last functional release was 0.8.0 in March 2025: a new freqtable() function, prop(), cprop() and rprop() extended to tables of three or more dimensions, and the addins moved onto the native pipe and forcats' current API. Both releases since exist purely to fix tests broken by R-devel changes to table internals.
singleRcapture reached 1.0.0 with no release notes at all — the arc has to be read backwards.
A package for single-source capture-recapture population size estimation: zero-truncated Poisson, geometric and negative binomial regression, Chao and Zelterman mixture models, analytic and bootstrap variance estimation, all behind estimatePopsize(). The 0.2.x line professionalised it — an offset argument, parallel bootstrap and dfbeta, faster semiparametric sampling, a singleRStaticCountData subclass explicitly created so a companion package could fit models from countreg and VGAM, then interaction-term and anova fixes. The 1.0.0 release carries nothing but a link to the compare view.
A long-running toolkit for survey data in R — proportion tables, weighted counts, and the interactive irec(), iorder() and icut() addins for recoding. The last functional release was 0.8.0 in March 2025: a new freqtable() function, prop(), cprop() and rprop() extended to tables of three or more dimensions, and the addins moved onto the native pipe and forcats' current API. Both releases since exist purely to fix tests broken by R-devel changes to table internals.
This is a stable package in compatibility-maintenance mode, where the release trigger is upstream churn rather than user demand. The functional work that does appear follows a consistent line — generalising the table functions beyond two dimensions, and keeping the interactive recoding addins aligned with current tidyverse idioms rather than the deprecated ones they were written against. The same maintainer's rainette shipped its own upstream-compatibility fix in the same window.
Expect the next release to be another R-devel or tidyverse compatibility fix; nothing in the entries points to new functionality.
A package for single-source capture-recapture population size estimation: zero-truncated Poisson, geometric and negative binomial regression, Chao and Zelterman mixture models, analytic and bootstrap variance estimation, all behind estimatePopsize(). The 0.2.x line professionalised it — an offset argument, parallel bootstrap and dfbeta, faster semiparametric sampling, a singleRStaticCountData subclass explicitly created so a companion package could fit models from countreg and VGAM, then interaction-term and anova fixes. The 1.0.0 release carries nothing but a link to the compare view.
The direction visible in 0.2.x is outward: refactoring for maintainability, extending to models fitted elsewhere via a subclass, adding a JSS-paper vignette, and pushing coverage towards 90%. That is a package preparing to be cited and extended rather than one still finding its methods. The 1.0.0 tag presumably marks the end of that stabilisation, but the entry itself gives no evidence either way.
Not readable from this feed — the 1.0.0 notes are empty, so whether the major version marks an API freeze or a breaking change cannot be determined from the entries shown.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either questionr or singlercapture.
A distribution catalogue that grows by one family at a time, and rarely breaks anything.
College football's open data client hit v2 — and now reports how many API calls you have left.
The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.
GeneNMF rebuilt how it derives meta-programs, changing every result it had produced.
Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.
A spatial-statistics utility package exists to be depended on, and is built accordingly.
See all questionr alternatives → · See all singlercapture alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. questionr and singlercapture are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. questionr and singlercapture are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top questionr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "questionr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/questionr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top singlercapture alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "singlercapture alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/singlercapture for the full list with editorial commentary on each.