← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

questionr vs rnpn

A side-by-side editorial comparison of questionr and rnpn — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

questionr vs rnpn: at a glance

Featurequestionrrnpn
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvey analysis, contingency tables, rstudio addins, tidyverse compatibilityphenology, api-client, ecological-data, data-cleaning
Last editorial update2h ago58m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is questionr?

questionr's survey helpers are finished; recent releases only keep pace with R-devel.

A long-running toolkit for survey data in R — proportion tables, weighted counts, and the interactive irec(), iorder() and icut() addins for recoding. The last functional release was 0.8.0 in March 2025: a new freqtable() function, prop(), cprop() and rprop() extended to tables of three or more dimensions, and the addins moved onto the native pipe and forcats' current API. Both releases since exist purely to fix tests broken by R-devel changes to table internals.

Read the full questionr trajectory →

What is rnpn?

The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.

rnpn is the R client for the USA National Phenology Network, retrieving observation records, phenometrics and gridded model layers. Version 1.3.0 in March 2025 replaced nearly all of its infrastructure at once — sp and raster dropped, terra made optional, XML swapped for xml2, plyr for dplyr, httr and curl for httr2 — and changed what functions return, with tibbles in place of data.tables and empty tibbles in place of NULL on error. The two releases since have completed the missing-value handling and restored performance lost in the transition.

Read the full rnpn trajectory →

questionr vs rnpn: editorial side-by-side

Q
questionr
ANALYTICS
0.0

questionr's survey helpers are finished; recent releases only keep pace with R-devel.

◆ Current state

A long-running toolkit for survey data in R — proportion tables, weighted counts, and the interactive irec(), iorder() and icut() addins for recoding. The last functional release was 0.8.0 in March 2025: a new freqtable() function, prop(), cprop() and rprop() extended to tables of three or more dimensions, and the addins moved onto the native pipe and forcats' current API. Both releases since exist purely to fix tests broken by R-devel changes to table internals.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a stable package in compatibility-maintenance mode, where the release trigger is upstream churn rather than user demand. The functional work that does appear follows a consistent line — generalising the table functions beyond two dimensions, and keeping the interactive recoding addins aligned with current tidyverse idioms rather than the deprecated ones they were written against. The same maintainer's rainette shipped its own upstream-compatibility fix in the same window.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to be another R-devel or tidyverse compatibility fix; nothing in the entries points to new functionality.

R
rnpn
ANALYTICS
0.0

The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.

◆ Current state

rnpn is the R client for the USA National Phenology Network, retrieving observation records, phenometrics and gridded model layers. Version 1.3.0 in March 2025 replaced nearly all of its infrastructure at once — sp and raster dropped, terra made optional, XML swapped for xml2, plyr for dplyr, httr and curl for httr2 — and changed what functions return, with tibbles in place of data.tables and empty tibbles in place of NULL on error. The two releases since have completed the missing-value handling and restored performance lost in the transition.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being brought onto the current R stack and made honest about missing data, and those are the same project. Converting the -9999 sentinel to NA started in 1.3.0 for download functions and was extended to all columns in 1.4.1; the string "emptyvalue" got the same treatment. Beyond the migration, the feature additions are modest and specific to the domain, such as custom start and end dates for defining a phenometrics season.

◆ Prediction

With the dependency migration finished and sentinel handling now applied across all columns, the next releases most likely return to domain features and to fixes surfaced by the server side, which has already prompted work through migrations and backend moves. The removed progress indicator is an acknowledged regression that may come back.

Alternatives to questionr and rnpn

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either questionr or rnpn.

See all questionr alternatives → · See all rnpn alternatives →

Recent activity from questionr and rnpn

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agoquestionrR-devel test fix for NA naming in tables
  2. 11mo agornpnSentinel -9999 now converted to NA across all columns
  3. 1y agoquestionrR-devel test fix for table subset classes
  4. 1y agornpnCustom season windows for phenometrics, and a speed regression fixed
  5. 1y agoquestionrfreqtable added; proportion tables handle three or more dimensions
  6. 1y agornpnDependency stack and return types replaced wholesale
  7. 1y agornpnBackfilled notes for seven earlier maintenance releases
  8. 3y agoquestionrAddins handle non-syntactic variable names
  9. 4y agoquestionrforcats errors on numeric variables fixed
  10. 4y agoquestionricut default changed; rp2018 dataset replaces rp99

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between questionr and rnpn?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. questionr and rnpn are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is questionr better than rnpn?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. questionr and rnpn are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to questionr?

Top questionr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "questionr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/questionr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rnpn?

Top rnpn alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rnpn alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rnpn for the full list with editorial commentary on each.