← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

questionr vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of questionr and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

questionr vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featurequestionrrempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvey analysis, contingency tables, rstudio addins, tidyverse compatibilityapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update2h ago59m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is questionr?

questionr's survey helpers are finished; recent releases only keep pace with R-devel.

A long-running toolkit for survey data in R — proportion tables, weighted counts, and the interactive irec(), iorder() and icut() addins for recoding. The last functional release was 0.8.0 in March 2025: a new freqtable() function, prop(), cprop() and rprop() extended to tables of three or more dimensions, and the addins moved onto the native pipe and forcats' current API. Both releases since exist purely to fix tests broken by R-devel changes to table internals.

Read the full questionr trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

questionr vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

Q
questionr
ANALYTICS
0.0

questionr's survey helpers are finished; recent releases only keep pace with R-devel.

◆ Current state

A long-running toolkit for survey data in R — proportion tables, weighted counts, and the interactive irec(), iorder() and icut() addins for recoding. The last functional release was 0.8.0 in March 2025: a new freqtable() function, prop(), cprop() and rprop() extended to tables of three or more dimensions, and the addins moved onto the native pipe and forcats' current API. Both releases since exist purely to fix tests broken by R-devel changes to table internals.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a stable package in compatibility-maintenance mode, where the release trigger is upstream churn rather than user demand. The functional work that does appear follows a consistent line — generalising the table functions beyond two dimensions, and keeping the interactive recoding addins aligned with current tidyverse idioms rather than the deprecated ones they were written against. The same maintainer's rainette shipped its own upstream-compatibility fix in the same window.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to be another R-devel or tidyverse compatibility fix; nothing in the entries points to new functionality.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to questionr and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either questionr or rempsyc.

See all questionr alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from questionr and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agoquestionrR-devel test fix for NA naming in tables
  2. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  3. 1y agoquestionrR-devel test fix for table subset classes
  4. 1y agoquestionrfreqtable added; proportion tables handle three or more dimensions
  5. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  6. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  7. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  8. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  9. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically
  10. 3y agoquestionrAddins handle non-syntactic variable names
  11. 4y agoquestionrforcats errors on numeric variables fixed
  12. 4y agoquestionricut default changed; rp2018 dataset replaces rp99

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between questionr and rempsyc?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. questionr and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is questionr better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. questionr and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to questionr?

Top questionr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "questionr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/questionr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.