← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

kde1d vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of kde1d and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

kde1d vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featurekde1drempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdensity-estimation, kernel-methods, zero-inflation, cpp-libraryapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update48m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is kde1d?

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

Read the full kde1d trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

kde1d vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

K
kde1d
ANALYTICS
0.0

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

◆ Current state

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has alternated between performance work and widening the class of data it accepts. The 1.0.0 release was the performance milestone — FFT-based estimation, a better integration algorithm for the p, q and r functions, deterministic jittering replacing randomness, and standalone C++ headers. The 1.1.0 release is the scope milestone, adding a third data type to the two it already handled. Releases come from the same maintainer as svines and cluster on shared dates, so changes in the underlying C++ surface across the vine and density stack tend to ship together.

◆ Prediction

With the C++ API deliberately reworked for standalone use at 1.1.0, further work most plausibly consolidates that interface rather than adding data types. What 1.1.1 actually changed is not readable from its body.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to kde1d and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kde1d or rempsyc.

See all kde1d alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from kde1d and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  2. 1y agokde1dkde1d 1.1.1
  3. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  4. 1y agokde1dZero-inflated mixtures and a new standalone C++ API
  5. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  6. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  7. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  8. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically
  9. 4y agokde1dBit-wise Boolean operations removed
  10. 5y agokde1ddkde1d() invisible output fixed
  11. 5y agokde1dValgrind false positive silenced
  12. 6y agokde1dqrng dependency dropped; undefined behaviour fixed

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between kde1d and rempsyc?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. kde1d and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is kde1d better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kde1d and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to kde1d?

Top kde1d alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kde1d alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kde1d for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.