← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

qtl vs seriation

A side-by-side editorial comparison of qtl and seriation — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

qtl vs seriation: at a glance

Featureqtlseriation
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgenetics, qtl-mapping, statistical-genomics, r-packageseriation, matrix-reordering, optimization, clustering
Last editorial update1h ago49m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is qtl?

R/qtl is in pure custodial mode: every recent release answers a compiler, not a user

R/qtl is the long-established R package for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering interval mapping, composite interval mapping, multiple-QTL model fitting and the associated cross data formats. Nothing in the recent release history adds capability. Version 1.74 removes an include that started warning on CRAN, 1.72 improves an error message in cim(), and 1.70 migrates the C code from Calloc/Realloc/Free to their R_-prefixed equivalents for R-devel.

Read the full qtl trajectory →

What is seriation?

seriation stopped shipping algorithms and started shipping a way to pick between them.

seriation finds meaningful orderings for matrices, distance objects and dendrograms, and carries a large registry of methods from classic combinatorial criteria to t-SNE and UMAP embeddings. The 1.5.0 release added a layer above that registry — seriate_best(), seriate_rep() and seriate_improve() — which run randomized methods repeatedly, in parallel, and keep the best result. Recent work is definitional and numeric rather than additive: 1.5.8 corrects the linear seriation criterion to match Hubert and Schultz's original 1976 definition.

Read the full seriation trajectory →

qtl vs seriation: editorial side-by-side

Q
qtl
ANALYTICS
0.0

R/qtl is in pure custodial mode: every recent release answers a compiler, not a user

◆ Current state

R/qtl is the long-established R package for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering interval mapping, composite interval mapping, multiple-QTL model fitting and the associated cross data formats. Nothing in the recent release history adds capability. Version 1.74 removes an include that started warning on CRAN, 1.72 improves an error message in cim(), and 1.70 migrates the C code from Calloc/Realloc/Free to their R_-prefixed equivalents for R-devel.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being maintained, not developed. The work divides cleanly into keeping the compiled code building against successive R and toolchain versions, and fixing narrow bugs reported through the issue tracker. The C-level migrations in particular are compliance with R's tightening of its C interface rather than anything chosen. Users should read the stability as maturity: the analysis surface has been fixed for years and the maintainer is keeping it installable.

◆ Prediction

R has continued to restrict its non-API C entry points, and this package has already made two such migrations, so further compile-time compliance work is the most likely content of the next release.

S
seriation
ANALYTICS
0.0

seriation stopped shipping algorithms and started shipping a way to pick between them.

◆ Current state

seriation finds meaningful orderings for matrices, distance objects and dendrograms, and carries a large registry of methods from classic combinatorial criteria to t-SNE and UMAP embeddings. The 1.5.0 release added a layer above that registry — seriate_best(), seriate_rep() and seriate_improve() — which run randomized methods repeatedly, in parallel, and keep the best result. Recent work is definitional and numeric rather than additive: 1.5.8 corrects the linear seriation criterion to match Hubert and Schultz's original 1976 definition.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has shifted from breadth to judgment. Through 1.3.x the additions were new methods; from 1.5.0 the registry started carrying metadata about the methods — whether they are randomized, what criterion they optimize — so the package could choose and evaluate on the user's behalf. The 1.5.6 replacement of FORTRAN with C for BEA and ME points the same way, reducing the legacy surface underneath that machinery.

◆ Prediction

Further criterion audits are the likeliest next move, since 1.5.8 shows a published definition being reconciled against the implementation and the registry now records what each method optimizes. Expect corrections rather than new seriation algorithms.

Alternatives to qtl and seriation

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either qtl or seriation.

See all qtl alternatives → · See all seriation alternatives →

Recent activity from qtl and seriation

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 8mo agoqtlRemove R_ext/PrtUtil.h include flagged by CRAN
  2. 8mo agoqtlClearer cim() error when multiple phenotypes are passed
  3. 0y agoseriationseriation 1.5.8 realigns linear criterion with Hubert and Schultz
  4. 1y agoseriationseriation 1.5.7 adds BK_unconstrained, handles tiny inputs
  5. 1y agoqtlC memory calls migrated to R_Calloc/R_Realloc/R_Free
  6. 1y agoseriationseriation 1.5.6 replaces FORTRAN BEA with C, modernizes allocation
  7. 2y agoseriationseriation 1.5.5 digest: AOE method, rep parameter, MDS_angle fix
  8. 2y agoqtlFix Rprintf call and remaining compiler warnings
  9. 2y agoqtlFix summary.scanone() thresholds and csvs phenotype reading
  10. 3y agoseriationseriation 1.5.1 refines pimage, permute and hmap
  11. 3y agoseriationseriation 1.5.0 adds seriate_best and parallel repeated search
  12. 3y agoqtlFix addint()/addcovarint() with X chromosome QTL and missing phenotypes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between qtl and seriation?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. qtl and seriation are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is qtl better than seriation?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. qtl and seriation are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to qtl?

Top qtl alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qtl alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qtl-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to seriation?

Top seriation alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "seriation alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/seriation-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.