← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

qtl vs rjdqa

A side-by-side editorial comparison of qtl and rjdqa — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

qtl vs rjdqa: at a glance

Featureqtlrjdqa
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgenetics, qtl-mapping, statistical-genomics, r-packageofficial-statistics, seasonal-adjustment, quality-assurance, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is qtl?

R/qtl is in pure custodial mode: every recent release answers a compiler, not a user

R/qtl is the long-established R package for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering interval mapping, composite interval mapping, multiple-QTL model fitting and the associated cross data formats. Nothing in the recent release history adds capability. Version 1.74 removes an include that started warning on CRAN, 1.72 improves an error message in cim(), and 1.70 migrates the C code from Calloc/Realloc/Free to their R_-prefixed equivalents for R-devel.

Read the full qtl trajectory →

What is rjdqa?

rjdqa keeps refining one screen: the seasonal adjustment quality dashboard

rjdqa builds quality assessment dashboards for seasonal adjustment models produced by JDemetra+, aimed at official statisticians reviewing adjusted series. Essentially all development goes into two functions, simple_dashboard() and its denser variant simple_dashboard2(). Version 0.1.6 adds parameters to append observations to the forecast and to control whether the residual trading-days test is printed, defaulting to monthly series only, plus outlier table layout work and user-defined calendar regressor support in sc_dashboard().

Read the full rjdqa trajectory →

qtl vs rjdqa: editorial side-by-side

Q
qtl
ANALYTICS
0.0

R/qtl is in pure custodial mode: every recent release answers a compiler, not a user

◆ Current state

R/qtl is the long-established R package for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering interval mapping, composite interval mapping, multiple-QTL model fitting and the associated cross data formats. Nothing in the recent release history adds capability. Version 1.74 removes an include that started warning on CRAN, 1.72 improves an error message in cim(), and 1.70 migrates the C code from Calloc/Realloc/Free to their R_-prefixed equivalents for R-devel.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being maintained, not developed. The work divides cleanly into keeping the compiled code building against successive R and toolchain versions, and fixing narrow bugs reported through the issue tracker. The C-level migrations in particular are compliance with R's tightening of its C interface rather than anything chosen. Users should read the stability as maturity: the analysis surface has been fixed for years and the maintainer is keeping it installable.

◆ Prediction

R has continued to restrict its non-API C entry points, and this package has already made two such migrations, so further compile-time compliance work is the most likely content of the next release.

R
rjdqa
ANALYTICS
0.0

rjdqa keeps refining one screen: the seasonal adjustment quality dashboard

◆ Current state

rjdqa builds quality assessment dashboards for seasonal adjustment models produced by JDemetra+, aimed at official statisticians reviewing adjusted series. Essentially all development goes into two functions, simple_dashboard() and its denser variant simple_dashboard2(). Version 0.1.6 adds parameters to append observations to the forecast and to control whether the residual trading-days test is printed, defaulting to monthly series only, plus outlier table layout work and user-defined calendar regressor support in sc_dashboard().

◆ Where it's heading

The package has converged on a single deliverable and is tuning it against reviewer practice. Each release adds a parameter that lets the analyst include or exclude one element of the dashboard, or adjusts how densely information is packed into the fixed space of the layout. The td_effect default — print the test only for monthly series — is characteristic: the knowledge about when a diagnostic is meaningful is being encoded into the tool rather than left to the reader.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of adding one toggle per diagnostic per release points at the same thing again, most likely another test given a conditional default, rather than a new dashboard function alongside the two that exist.

Alternatives to qtl and rjdqa

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either qtl or rjdqa.

See all qtl alternatives → · See all rjdqa alternatives →

Recent activity from qtl and rjdqa

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 8mo agoqtlRemove R_ext/PrtUtil.h include flagged by CRAN
  2. 8mo agoqtlClearer cim() error when multiple phenotypes are passed
  3. 9mo agorjdqaForecast observations and conditional trading-days test in dashboards
  4. 1y agorjdqaFix tail() usage on ts objects
  5. 1y agoqtlC memory calls migrated to R_Calloc/R_Realloc/R_Free
  6. 2y agorjdqaFix dependency minimums and outlier ordering
  7. 2y agorjdqasimple_dashboard2() added; deprecated sa_dashboard() removed
  8. 2y agorjdqasimple_dashboard() introduced; sa_dashboard() deprecated
  9. 2y agoqtlFix Rprintf call and remaining compiler warnings
  10. 2y agoqtlFix summary.scanone() thresholds and csvs phenotype reading
  11. 3y agoqtlFix addint()/addcovarint() with X chromosome QTL and missing phenotypes
  12. 7y agorjdqaFirst CRAN release

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between qtl and rjdqa?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. qtl and rjdqa are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is qtl better than rjdqa?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. qtl and rjdqa are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to qtl?

Top qtl alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qtl alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qtl-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rjdqa?

Top rjdqa alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rjdqa alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rjdqa-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.