← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

PowerTOST vs remap

A side-by-side editorial comparison of PowerTOST and remap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

PowerTOST vs remap: at a glance

FeaturePowerTOSTremap
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbioequivalence, sample-size, regulatory, pharmacometricsspatial-modeling, geostatistics, r-packages, maintenance-mode
Last editorial update19h ago47m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is PowerTOST?

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

Read the full PowerTOST trajectory →

What is remap?

A regional-model smoother in long-term maintenance, four years past its last real feature.

remap fits separate models to geographic regions and blends their predictions into a continuous surface, using the min_n nearest observations so region boundaries do not show as discontinuities. The methodological work is finished — the last behavioural change landed in 2022, and everything since has been unit handling, compiler warnings, dependency compatibility and citation updates. The July release is one such patch.

Read the full remap trajectory →

PowerTOST vs remap: editorial side-by-side

P
PowerTOST
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

◆ Current state

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is in long maintenance with a widening regulatory surface: the statistical methods are settled, and releases arrive when an agency publishes a framework that can be expressed as a settings variant of an existing method. Function naming has been deliberately decoupled from any single agency, with the deprecated FDA-suffixed aliases carried for years before removal. Cadence has slowed to roughly one release every eighteen months.

◆ Prediction

The next release is most likely another regulator setting or a small fix; on the deprecation notice already given, the power.NTIDFDA()-style aliases are the obvious removal candidate.

R
remap
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A regional-model smoother in long-term maintenance, four years past its last real feature.

◆ Current state

remap fits separate models to geographic regions and blends their predictions into a continuous surface, using the min_n nearest observations so region boundaries do not show as discontinuities. The methodological work is finished — the last behavioural change landed in 2022, and everything since has been unit handling, compiler warnings, dependency compatibility and citation updates. The July release is one such patch.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a stable academic package tracking its ecosystem rather than growing. The visible pattern is reactive maintenance: sf's 1.0.0 transition, ggplot2's size-to-linewidth rename, a gcc-UBSAN error on zero-point distance calculations, and now a check that distance matrices passed to remap() and predict() are converted to kilometres. Note that the feed's timestamps invert the version order — 0.3.1 is stamped seconds after 0.3.2 despite being the earlier release, so recency in this feed is not a reliable guide to sequence.

◆ Prediction

Nothing in these entries points to new capability. The realistic expectation is more of the same: a patch whenever sf, ggplot2 or a CRAN check surfaces an incompatibility, at roughly the observed cadence of one release every year or two.

Alternatives to PowerTOST and remap

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either PowerTOST or remap.

See all PowerTOST alternatives → · See all remap alternatives →

Recent activity from PowerTOST and remap

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoremapDistance matrices now converted to kilometres automatically
  2. 10mo agoPowerTOSTFix for splitting total sample size across sequences
  3. 1y agoremapCitation updated to the R Journal article
  4. 1y agoremapUBSAN fix, parallel patch and sf search-path independence
  5. 2y agoPowerTOSTNTID functions renamed off the FDA acronym; GCC guidance in vignettes
  6. 3y agoremappredict() can return an upper bound on combined standard errors
  7. 4y agoPowerTOSTpower.NTID() aliases added; FDA-suffixed names deprecated
  8. 5y agoremapRegions without observations no longer break the prediction surface
  9. 5y agoPowerTOSTGulf Co-operation Council added as a regulator setting
  10. 5y agoPowerTOSTMaintenance release with vignette and documentation clarifications
  11. 5y agoPowerTOSTstringsAsFactors fix for older R in a vignette example

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between PowerTOST and remap?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. PowerTOST and remap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is PowerTOST better than remap?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. PowerTOST and remap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to PowerTOST?

Top PowerTOST alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PowerTOST alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/powertost for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to remap?

Top remap alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "remap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/remap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.