← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

remap vs surveytidy

A side-by-side editorial comparison of remap and surveytidy — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packages

remap vs surveytidy: at a glance

Featureremapsurveytidy
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesspatial-modeling, geostatistics, r-packages, maintenance-modesurvey-statistics, tidyverse, dplyr-verbs, metadata-tracking
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is remap?

A regional-model smoother in long-term maintenance, four years past its last real feature.

remap fits separate models to geographic regions and blends their predictions into a continuous surface, using the min_n nearest observations so region boundaries do not show as discontinuities. The methodological work is finished — the last behavioural change landed in 2022, and everything since has been unit handling, compiler warnings, dependency compatibility and citation updates. The July release is one such patch.

Read the full remap trajectory →

What is surveytidy?

surveytidy taught every dplyr verb to operate on a whole collection of surveys at once.

surveytidy is the tidyverse-facing half of a two-package survey stack, wrapping survey design objects from surveycore so filter, mutate, select and the rest work on them while carrying variable labels, value labels and a transformation log alongside the data. The May release extended that verb surface to survey_collection, the abstraction surveycore uses to hold several surveys as one object, so a pipeline written once dispatches across every member.

Read the full surveytidy trajectory →

remap vs surveytidy: editorial side-by-side

R
remap
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A regional-model smoother in long-term maintenance, four years past its last real feature.

◆ Current state

remap fits separate models to geographic regions and blends their predictions into a continuous surface, using the min_n nearest observations so region boundaries do not show as discontinuities. The methodological work is finished — the last behavioural change landed in 2022, and everything since has been unit handling, compiler warnings, dependency compatibility and citation updates. The July release is one such patch.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a stable academic package tracking its ecosystem rather than growing. The visible pattern is reactive maintenance: sf's 1.0.0 transition, ggplot2's size-to-linewidth rename, a gcc-UBSAN error on zero-point distance calculations, and now a check that distance matrices passed to remap() and predict() are converted to kilometres. Note that the feed's timestamps invert the version order — 0.3.1 is stamped seconds after 0.3.2 despite being the earlier release, so recency in this feed is not a reliable guide to sequence.

◆ Prediction

Nothing in these entries points to new capability. The realistic expectation is more of the same: a patch whenever sf, ggplot2 or a CRAN check surfaces an incompatibility, at roughly the observed cadence of one release every year or two.

S
surveytidy
INFRA · APIS
0.0

surveytidy taught every dplyr verb to operate on a whole collection of surveys at once.

◆ Current state

surveytidy is the tidyverse-facing half of a two-package survey stack, wrapping survey design objects from surveycore so filter, mutate, select and the rest work on them while carrying variable labels, value labels and a transformation log alongside the data. The May release extended that verb surface to survey_collection, the abstraction surveycore uses to hold several surveys as one object, so a pipeline written once dispatches across every member.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being built in two layers that arrive in order: vector-level transformations first, structural dispatch second. The make_* family in 0.4.0 handles the recoding that survey work actually consists of — labelled to factor, multi-level to dichotomous, scale reversal, valence flipping — with value labels propagating automatically. Collection support then applies data-masking, tidyselect, grouping, slicing and collapsing verbs per survey, with joins explicitly refused and a typed message reporting which surveys were skipped. Metadata fidelity is the recurring bug source: labels surviving across(), stale labels left behind by recoding, the transformation log keeping up with what the verbs did.

◆ Prediction

Joins are the one verb family that errors on collections, with users directed to join before constructing the collection, so that restriction is the clearest outstanding gap. The re-export of surveycore's collection constructors suggests the package is positioning itself as the single import users need, which points toward more re-exports as surveycore's stable API settles.

Alternatives to remap and surveytidy

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either remap or surveytidy.

See all remap alternatives → · See all surveytidy alternatives →

Recent activity from remap and surveytidy

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoremapDistance matrices now converted to kilometres automatically
  2. 2mo agosurveytidymutate() syncs metadata for across() recodes
  3. 3mo agosurveytidydplyr and tidyr verbs dispatch across survey collections
  4. 5mo agosurveytidyFive label-aware recoding functions for use inside mutate()
  5. 1y agoremapCitation updated to the R Journal article
  6. 1y agoremapUBSAN fix, parallel patch and sf search-path independence
  7. 3y agoremappredict() can return an upper bound on combined standard errors
  8. 5y agoremapRegions without observations no longer break the prediction surface

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between remap and surveytidy?

Both compete on the same themes — r-packages — within Infra & APIs. remap and surveytidy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is remap better than surveytidy?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. remap and surveytidy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to remap?

Top remap alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "remap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/remap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to surveytidy?

Top surveytidy alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveytidy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveytidy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.