← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

PEIMAN2 vs remap

A side-by-side editorial comparison of PEIMAN2 and remap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packages

PEIMAN2 vs remap: at a glance

FeaturePEIMAN2remap
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesproteomics, post-translational-modification, enrichment-analysis, reproducibilityspatial-modeling, geostatistics, r-packages, maintenance-mode
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is PEIMAN2?

PEIMAN2 cut its annotation database loose from its release cycle without breaking CRAN.

PEIMAN2 does enrichment analysis over post-translational modifications, testing whether a protein list is enriched for particular PTMs against UniProt-derived annotations, with translation functions bridging to mass spectrometry workflows. Its answers are only as current as its bundled database, and until June that database could only be refreshed by releasing a new package version. Version 1.1.0 changes that.

Read the full PEIMAN2 trajectory →

What is remap?

A regional-model smoother in long-term maintenance, four years past its last real feature.

remap fits separate models to geographic regions and blends their predictions into a continuous surface, using the min_n nearest observations so region boundaries do not show as discontinuities. The methodological work is finished — the last behavioural change landed in 2022, and everything since has been unit handling, compiler warnings, dependency compatibility and citation updates. The July release is one such patch.

Read the full remap trajectory →

PEIMAN2 vs remap: editorial side-by-side

P
PEIMAN2
INFRA · APIS
0.0

PEIMAN2 cut its annotation database loose from its release cycle without breaking CRAN.

◆ Current state

PEIMAN2 does enrichment analysis over post-translational modifications, testing whether a protein list is enriched for particular PTMs against UniProt-derived annotations, with translation functions bridging to mass spectrometry workflows. Its answers are only as current as its bundled database, and until June that database could only be refreshed by releasing a new package version. Version 1.1.0 changes that.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has been moving from a fixed snapshot toward versioned, user-selectable data. Earlier releases updated the bundled database in place — 1.0.0 shipped the March 2025 version and said little else — which meant the annotation vintage was whatever the package version implied. Now update_peiman_database() downloads and caches external database files and UniProt PTM lists, enrichment workflows take a database_version argument, and the mass-spec translators take a ptmlist_version, so an analysis can pin a dated database rather than a package release. The CRAN-safe default is preserved deliberately: loading, examples and checks still use the bundled internal data and need no network.

◆ Prediction

Version pinning is now expressible but the release notes do not describe how a chosen version is recorded in output, so surfacing the active database version in results is the natural companion. The database and the UniProt PTM list are versioned separately, which leaves room for a combined manifest.

R
remap
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A regional-model smoother in long-term maintenance, four years past its last real feature.

◆ Current state

remap fits separate models to geographic regions and blends their predictions into a continuous surface, using the min_n nearest observations so region boundaries do not show as discontinuities. The methodological work is finished — the last behavioural change landed in 2022, and everything since has been unit handling, compiler warnings, dependency compatibility and citation updates. The July release is one such patch.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a stable academic package tracking its ecosystem rather than growing. The visible pattern is reactive maintenance: sf's 1.0.0 transition, ggplot2's size-to-linewidth rename, a gcc-UBSAN error on zero-point distance calculations, and now a check that distance matrices passed to remap() and predict() are converted to kilometres. Note that the feed's timestamps invert the version order — 0.3.1 is stamped seconds after 0.3.2 despite being the earlier release, so recency in this feed is not a reliable guide to sequence.

◆ Prediction

Nothing in these entries points to new capability. The realistic expectation is more of the same: a patch whenever sf, ggplot2 or a CRAN check surfaces an incompatibility, at roughly the observed cadence of one release every year or two.

Alternatives to PEIMAN2 and remap

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either PEIMAN2 or remap.

See all PEIMAN2 alternatives → · See all remap alternatives →

Recent activity from PEIMAN2 and remap

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoremapDistance matrices now converted to kilometres automatically
  2. 2mo agoPEIMAN2Database updates decouple from package releases
  3. 1y agoPEIMAN2Bundled database refreshed to the March 2025 UniProt vintage
  4. 1y agoPEIMAN2Documentation fix for the second example dataset
  5. 1y agoremapCitation updated to the R Journal article
  6. 1y agoremapUBSAN fix, parallel patch and sf search-path independence
  7. 2y agoPEIMAN2Background lists for SEA and PSEA; tidyverse dependency dropped
  8. 3y agoremappredict() can return an upper bound on combined standard errors
  9. 5y agoremapRegions without observations no longer break the prediction surface

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between PEIMAN2 and remap?

Both compete on the same themes — r-packages — within Infra & APIs. PEIMAN2 and remap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is PEIMAN2 better than remap?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. PEIMAN2 and remap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to PEIMAN2?

Top PEIMAN2 alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PEIMAN2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/peiman2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to remap?

Top remap alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "remap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/remap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.