Drip
Two-month digests that keep circling the same theme: get your data out of Drip and into your own stack.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Pardot and Pushwoosh — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Pardot's Summer '26 release shows the bridge to Marketing Cloud Next is being built feature by feature.
The substantive signal in this window is the Salesforce Summer '26 release for Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (the artist formerly known as Pardot): consent data now syncs between Account Engagement and Marketing Cloud Next via static public list mapping, plus expanded email capabilities (CC recipients, archiving) inside Marketing Cloud Next. The rest of the captured feed is broken scrapes of Salesforce help pages - mostly CSS errors and JavaScript exceptions.
Pushwoosh journeys can now read what a webhook says back and act on it mid-run.
The current release batch is broad but coherent. Journeys gained the ability to consume webhook response data and use returned values to personalize later steps in the same run. Messaging coverage evened out across channels, with PW_SMSSent and PW_WhatsAppSent events matching what email already emitted, and one-time WhatsApp sends no longer requiring a journey. On the web side, subscription forms can be dropped into any popup as lead capture, form field labels are editable without code, and the popup editor and targeting both got more room to work.
The substantive signal in this window is the Salesforce Summer '26 release for Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (the artist formerly known as Pardot): consent data now syncs between Account Engagement and Marketing Cloud Next via static public list mapping, plus expanded email capabilities (CC recipients, archiving) inside Marketing Cloud Next. The rest of the captured feed is broken scrapes of Salesforce help pages - mostly CSS errors and JavaScript exceptions.
Salesforce is gradually wiring Pardot into Marketing Cloud Next rather than sunsetting it abruptly - consent sync and shared email primitives are the kind of integrations that smooth a long-running migration. Expect each seasonal release to add another shared object (subscriptions, audiences, journeys, attribution) until the practical difference between the two products narrows. The ingestion problem on the source side is severe; most product-relevant context is buried under broken page captures.
Next likely beats: shared audience and segmentation primitives between Account Engagement and Marketing Cloud Next, plus journey-stitching across both. On data quality, the Salesforce help center scraping needs a different ingestion approach - likely the official release-notes RSS or PDF rather than the JS-rendered help portal.
The current release batch is broad but coherent. Journeys gained the ability to consume webhook response data and use returned values to personalize later steps in the same run. Messaging coverage evened out across channels, with PW_SMSSent and PW_WhatsAppSent events matching what email already emitted, and one-time WhatsApp sends no longer requiring a journey. On the web side, subscription forms can be dropped into any popup as lead capture, form field labels are editable without code, and the popup editor and targeting both got more room to work.
Two things are being closed at once. The channel gap is narrowing — SMS and WhatsApp are being given the same event surface and standalone send path email has had, which makes them first-class for segmentation and triggering rather than journey-only endpoints. The bigger change is that journeys are becoming stateful against the outside world: a webhook step that can return a value into the run turns the journey builder from a sequencer into something closer to orchestration.
Now that webhook responses can feed a running journey, the natural extension is branching on those values and handling failure paths when the external call does not answer as expected. Expect the remaining email-only capabilities to keep arriving for SMS and WhatsApp until channel parity is complete.
Other Mkt Auto products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Pardot or Pushwoosh.
Two-month digests that keep circling the same theme: get your data out of Drip and into your own stack.
The forms plugin just opened its data to AI agents through an MCP adapter.
A security-hardening train: nine advisories across six patch releases, no feature work in sight.
Three release lines running in parallel, all of them shipping nothing but fixes this week
OpnForm is turning its V2 platform into an automation surface, one integration at a time.
Zoho Social opens its management surface to AI assistants via MCP.
See all Pardot alternatives → · See all Pushwoosh alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Pardot and Pushwoosh are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Pardot and Pushwoosh are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Mkt Auto products to evaluate alongside.
Top Pardot alternatives in Mkt Auto are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Pardot alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/pardot for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Pushwoosh alternatives in Mkt Auto are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Pushwoosh alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/pushwoosh for the full list with editorial commentary on each.