rjdqa
rjdqa keeps refining one screen: the seasonal adjustment quality dashboard
Comparison · Analytics
NWCTrends vs survminer
A side-by-side editorial comparison of NWCTrends and survminer — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
NWCTrends vs survminer: at a glance
What is NWCTrends?
The salmon status-review trend package, maintained one federal review cycle at a time
NWCTrends fits multivariate state-space trend models to Pacific salmon population data and generates the tables and figures used in NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center viability and status reviews. Its release history maps onto those review cycles rather than a development calendar: v1.0 carries the 2015 review code, v1.25 the 2020 review, v1.30 the changes since. The 2026 v1.31 is internal restructuring and a dependency swap.
What is survminer?
survminer is back after a five-year gap, and spending it cutting dependencies loose.
survminer draws Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox diagnostics on top of ggplot2, and it sits under a large share of published survival figures. After a long dormancy it has shipped three releases since late 2024, and all of them are about staying compatible: with ggplot2 3.5, then 4.0, and now without survMisc, whose weighted log-rank tests are computed internally in base R as of 0.5.2. The plotting API itself has not changed.
NWCTrends vs survminer: editorial side-by-side
NWCTrends
0.0ANALYTICS
The salmon status-review trend package, maintained one federal review cycle at a time
◆ Current state
NWCTrends fits multivariate state-space trend models to Pacific salmon population data and generates the tables and figures used in NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center viability and status reviews. Its release history maps onto those review cycles rather than a development calendar: v1.0 carries the 2015 review code, v1.25 the 2020 review, v1.30 the changes since. The 2026 v1.31 is internal restructuring and a dependency swap.
◆ Where it's heading
Development is driven by reproducibility of a specific government reporting product, so most work goes into making the report generation configurable and the fitting assumptions explicit rather than into new modelling. The 2020 cycle removed hard-coded per-population hacks and made the fitting window an explicit argument; the 2023 cycle moved plot styling into package options and clarified how missing data and zeros are handled in the published tables.
◆ Prediction
The cadence suggests the next substantive release arrives with the next status review rather than before it, most likely continuing the move of report parameters out of function signatures and into structured configuration.
survminer
0.0ANALYTICS
survminer is back after a five-year gap, and spending it cutting dependencies loose.
◆ Current state
survminer draws Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox diagnostics on top of ggplot2, and it sits under a large share of published survival figures. After a long dormancy it has shipped three releases since late 2024, and all of them are about staying compatible: with ggplot2 3.5, then 4.0, and now without survMisc, whose weighted log-rank tests are computed internally in base R as of 0.5.2. The plotting API itself has not changed.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a revival by maintenance, not by feature work — the same pattern as its sibling packages from the same author. The dependency surface is being reduced rather than extended, and each release absorbs a breaking change from ggplot2 that would otherwise leave existing scripts producing errors or misaligned risk tables. Compatibility fixes now arrive within months of the upstream change rather than years.
◆ Prediction
Continued ggplot2 4.x tracking is the most likely next release content, since 0.5.2 already carries fixes for 4.0.x aesthetics and the GeomConfint stairstep problem.
Alternatives to NWCTrends and survminer
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either NWCTrends or survminer.
epikit
epikit narrows to field-epidemiology helpers, handing proportions to a sibling package
SimInf
SimInf 10.0 turns an epidemic simulator into a tool that fits models to real time series
mutagen
A young package porting Stata's egen row-wise helpers to the tidyverse, one function per release
broman
A statistician's personal toolbox, growing one plotting utility at a time
qtl
R/qtl is in pure custodial mode: every recent release answers a compiler, not a user
See all NWCTrends alternatives → · See all survminer alternatives →
Recent activity from NWCTrends and survminer
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5mo agosurvminersurvMisc dependency removed; weighted log-rank tests moved in-house
- 7mo agoNWCTrendsReport params extracted to a list; gdata replaced with readxl
- 11mo agosurvminerRisk-table misalignment fixed via dynamic panel detection
- 1y agosurvminerggcoxzph() sd scaling corrected; tidyverse deprecations cleared
- 3y agoNWCTrendsPlot options move into package globals; figure data exported to CSV
- 5y agoNWCTrendsExplicit fitting window replaces implicit full-data fits
- 5y agoNWCTrendsInitial release packaging the 2015 status review code
- 5y agosurvminerGehan-Breslow p-value corrected for log.rank.weights = n
- 6y agosurvminerbroom 0.7.0 compatibility fix in ggforest()
- 6y agosurvminersurv_adjustedcurves() separates computation from plotting
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between NWCTrends and survminer?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. NWCTrends and survminer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is NWCTrends better than survminer?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. NWCTrends and survminer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to NWCTrends?
Top NWCTrends alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "NWCTrends alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nwctrends-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to survminer?
Top survminer alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "survminer alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/survminer for the full list with editorial commentary on each.