STACAS
Single-cell batch correction that learned to use cell labels, then spent three releases chasing Seurat.
Comparison · Analytics
nmar vs rempsyc
A side-by-side editorial comparison of nmar and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
nmar vs rempsyc: at a glance
What is nmar?
NMAR landed on CRAN with two nonresponse estimators behind one interface, then started tuning it.
Three releases in seven weeks, starting from nothing. The initial CRAN release implements empirical likelihood (Qin, Leung and Shao 2002) and both parametric and nonparametric exponential tilting (Riddles, Kim and Im 2016) for estimating means under nonignorable nonresponse, all reachable through a single nmar() call with formula syntax and direct support for survey.design objects. Since then the work has been operational: a configurable bootstrap backend and stricter input validation.
What is rempsyc?
Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.
rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.
nmar vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side
nmar
0.0ANALYTICS
NMAR landed on CRAN with two nonresponse estimators behind one interface, then started tuning it.
◆ Current state
Three releases in seven weeks, starting from nothing. The initial CRAN release implements empirical likelihood (Qin, Leung and Shao 2002) and both parametric and nonparametric exponential tilting (Riddles, Kim and Im 2016) for estimating means under nonignorable nonresponse, all reachable through a single nmar() call with formula syntax and direct support for survey.design objects. Since then the work has been operational: a configurable bootstrap backend and stricter input validation.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is positioning itself as the general interface to nonignorable-nonresponse estimation rather than a reference implementation of one paper — shared architecture across engines, one formula API, and integration with the survey package so weights and stratification come for free. The follow-up releases suggest the next constraint is compute: bootstrap variance estimation is the expensive part, and it now dispatches to future.apply when a parallel plan exists.
◆ Prediction
Expect further engines under the same nmar() interface or wider bootstrap support, since the architecture was explicitly refactored to share structure across estimators.
rempsyc
0.0ANALYTICS
Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.
◆ Current state
rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.
◆ Where it's heading
Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.
◆ Prediction
The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.
Alternatives to nmar and rempsyc
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either nmar or rempsyc.
ggtrace
A debugger for ggplot2's internals, hardening its grip as the internals it traces keep moving.
kde1d
A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.
svines
Stationary vine copulas for time series, released in lockstep with the rest of Nagler's vine stack.
gghighlight
A single-purpose ggplot2 extension that has spent six years tracking ggplot2 instead of growing.
rtrek
A Star Trek data package that became a Memory Alpha web client and has been patching scrapers ever since.
See all nmar alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →
Recent activity from nmar and rempsyc
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 6mo agonmarBootstrap backend now parallel-aware and configurable
- 7mo agonmarCRAN submission fixes and DOI references
- 8mo agonmarNMAR 0.1.0 ⚡
- 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
- 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
- 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
- 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
- 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
- 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between nmar and rempsyc?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. nmar and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is nmar better than rempsyc?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. nmar and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to nmar?
Top nmar alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "nmar alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nmar for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?
Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.