tidytext
Finished, widely taught, and shipping roxygen fixes.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of mlr3cluster and mlr3fselect — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
mlr3cluster went from a handful of clusterers to covering the field
mlr3cluster supplies clustering learners to the mlr3 framework. Over three releases it added roughly a dozen learners — CLARA, k-prototypes, spectral, then a batch of nine covering finite mixtures, spherical and directional families, self-organising maps, spatio-temporal DBSCAN and robust trimmed clustering. The newest release fixes predict-time behaviour across the hierarchical learners.
mlr3fselect turned feature selection into an asynchronous, distributable job
mlr3fselect runs feature selection for mlr3. The defining change in this window is 1.4.0, which introduced FSelectorAsync and the asynchronous instance classes, letting searches run without a synchronous batch loop. Around it sit ensemble feature selection work — fastVoteR ranking, embedded ensemble selection, result combination — and performance work on objective evaluation.
mlr3cluster supplies clustering learners to the mlr3 framework. Over three releases it added roughly a dozen learners — CLARA, k-prototypes, spectral, then a batch of nine covering finite mixtures, spherical and directional families, self-organising maps, spatio-temporal DBSCAN and robust trimmed clustering. The newest release fixes predict-time behaviour across the hierarchical learners.
The package is at the tail end of a coverage push, and the emphasis has shifted from adding algorithms to making the ones it has behave correctly at prediction time — cutting trees at the current k, reclustering coresets, failing informatively on unsupported metric combinations. That is the normal sequence after a rapid expansion.
Expect further predict-path corrections and parameter-set alignment across the newly added learners before any more algorithms arrive.
mlr3fselect runs feature selection for mlr3. The defining change in this window is 1.4.0, which introduced FSelectorAsync and the asynchronous instance classes, letting searches run without a synchronous batch loop. Around it sit ensemble feature selection work — fastVoteR ranking, embedded ensemble selection, result combination — and performance work on objective evaluation.
Two threads run in parallel: scaling the search itself through async execution and the rush backend, and making ensemble selection results easier to analyse via Pareto fronts, knee points and now removal of empty result rows. The rush backward-compatibility shim was dropped in 1.6.0, so the async path is now the assumed one.
Expect the ensemble result API to keep gaining analysis helpers, with async execution treated as the default rather than an option.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mlr3cluster or mlr3fselect.
Finished, widely taught, and shipping roxygen fixes.
Text features finally stay sparse all the way to the model.
The package that made calibration a step instead of an afterthought.
workflowsets keeps widening what counts as a model worth comparing.
The tidymodels pipeline grew a third stage, and it happens after the model runs.
Posit's MLOps package went quiet for two years, then came back to keep up with recipes.
See all mlr3cluster alternatives → · See all mlr3fselect alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — mlr3, machine-learning, r-stats — within Analytics. mlr3cluster and mlr3fselect are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mlr3cluster and mlr3fselect are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top mlr3cluster alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mlr3cluster alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mlr3cluster for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top mlr3fselect alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mlr3fselect alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mlr3fselect for the full list with editorial commentary on each.