tidytext
Finished, widely taught, and shipping roxygen fixes.
Comparison · Analytics
mlr3fselect vs probably
A side-by-side editorial comparison of mlr3fselect and probably — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
mlr3fselect vs probably: at a glance
What is mlr3fselect?
mlr3fselect turned feature selection into an asynchronous, distributable job
mlr3fselect runs feature selection for mlr3. The defining change in this window is 1.4.0, which introduced FSelectorAsync and the asynchronous instance classes, letting searches run without a synchronous batch loop. Around it sit ensemble feature selection work — fastVoteR ranking, embedded ensemble selection, result combination — and performance work on objective evaluation.
What is probably?
The package that made calibration a step instead of an afterthought.
probably started as a small utility for class predictions and equivocal zones, and version 1.0.0 turned it into tidymodels' calibration and uncertainty package: cal_plot_*, cal_estimate_*, cal_validate_* and cal_apply across binary, multiclass and regression problems, plus conformal prediction intervals. Since then the work has been consolidation — a large internal refactor with no API change, split conformal and conformal quantile regression, bound_prediction(), and required_pkgs() and butcher methods so conformal objects can be deployed and stripped.
mlr3fselect vs probably: editorial side-by-side
mlr3fselect
0.0ANALYTICS
mlr3fselect turned feature selection into an asynchronous, distributable job
◆ Current state
mlr3fselect runs feature selection for mlr3. The defining change in this window is 1.4.0, which introduced FSelectorAsync and the asynchronous instance classes, letting searches run without a synchronous batch loop. Around it sit ensemble feature selection work — fastVoteR ranking, embedded ensemble selection, result combination — and performance work on objective evaluation.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run in parallel: scaling the search itself through async execution and the rush backend, and making ensemble selection results easier to analyse via Pareto fronts, knee points and now removal of empty result rows. The rush backward-compatibility shim was dropped in 1.6.0, so the async path is now the assumed one.
◆ Prediction
Expect the ensemble result API to keep gaining analysis helpers, with async execution treated as the default rather than an option.
probably
0.0ANALYTICS
The package that made calibration a step instead of an afterthought.
◆ Current state
probably started as a small utility for class predictions and equivocal zones, and version 1.0.0 turned it into tidymodels' calibration and uncertainty package: cal_plot_*, cal_estimate_*, cal_validate_* and cal_apply across binary, multiclass and regression problems, plus conformal prediction intervals. Since then the work has been consolidation — a large internal refactor with no API change, split conformal and conformal quantile regression, bound_prediction(), and required_pkgs() and butcher methods so conformal objects can be deployed and stripped.
◆ Where it's heading
The recent releases are about making these objects survive leaving the session. butcher and required_pkgs() methods are what a model needs to be pinned, containerised and served, and their arrival alongside workflows adding a tailor postprocessing stage and vetiver adding probably support points the same way: calibration is being moved out of analysis scripts and into the deployed pipeline. The cal_*_none() reference implementations are the tell that calibration is now something people tune rather than apply once.
◆ Prediction
Expect the calibration functions to be reachable directly from a tuned workflow's postprocessing stage rather than applied to predictions afterwards, following the tailor integration that workflows just shipped.
Alternatives to mlr3fselect and probably
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mlr3fselect or probably.
textrecipes
Text features finally stay sparse all the way to the model.
workflowsets
workflowsets keeps widening what counts as a model worth comparing.
workflows
The tidymodels pipeline grew a third stage, and it happens after the model runs.
vetiver
Posit's MLOps package went quiet for two years, then came back to keep up with recipes.
patchwork
patchwork stopped being a ggplot composer and became a page composer.
See all mlr3fselect alternatives → · See all probably alternatives →
Recent activity from mlr3fselect and probably
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agomlr3fselectEmpty-selection rows removable from ensemble results
- 8mo agomlr3fselectFaster objective evaluation and always_included roles
- 10mo agoprobablyConformal objects gain required_pkgs() and butcher methods
- 1y agomlr3fselectAsynchronous feature selection arrives with FSelectorAsync ⚡
- 1y agoprobablyggplot2 test updates and a clearer validation-set error
- 1y agoprobablyCalibration internals refactored; isotonic bootstrap bug fixed
- 1y agomlr3fselectEmbedded ensemble selection and result combination
- 1y agomlr3fselectInternal tuning callback added
- 1y agomlr3fselectmlr3 0.21.0 compatibility and archive slimming
- 2y agoprobablyFix grouping sensitivity to variable type
- 3y agoprobablySplit conformal and conformal quantile regression added
- 3y agoprobablyCalibration and conformal inference arrive in tidymodels ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between mlr3fselect and probably?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. mlr3fselect and probably are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is mlr3fselect better than probably?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mlr3fselect and probably are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to mlr3fselect?
Top mlr3fselect alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mlr3fselect alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mlr3fselect for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to probably?
Top probably alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "probably alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/probably for the full list with editorial commentary on each.