tidytext
Finished, widely taught, and shipping roxygen fixes.
Comparison · Analytics
mlr3fselect vs workflows
A side-by-side editorial comparison of mlr3fselect and workflows — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
mlr3fselect vs workflows: at a glance
What is mlr3fselect?
mlr3fselect turned feature selection into an asynchronous, distributable job
mlr3fselect runs feature selection for mlr3. The defining change in this window is 1.4.0, which introduced FSelectorAsync and the asynchronous instance classes, letting searches run without a synchronous batch loop. Around it sit ensemble feature selection work — fastVoteR ranking, embedded ensemble selection, result combination — and performance work on objective evaluation.
What is workflows?
The tidymodels pipeline grew a third stage, and it happens after the model runs.
workflows bundles a preprocessor and a model into one object that tidymodels can fit, tune and extract from. Version 1.3.0 added a post stage backed by the tailor package, wired through every generic a workflow supports — augment, tidy, tunable, tune_args, required_pkgs and parameter extraction. Version 1.2.0 added sparse data support so fit() and predict() accept dgCMatrix and sparse tibbles. Earlier releases in view are boundary tightening: erroring on unknown model modes, on trained recipes, and on silently ignored formula offsets.
mlr3fselect vs workflows: editorial side-by-side
mlr3fselect
0.0ANALYTICS
mlr3fselect turned feature selection into an asynchronous, distributable job
◆ Current state
mlr3fselect runs feature selection for mlr3. The defining change in this window is 1.4.0, which introduced FSelectorAsync and the asynchronous instance classes, letting searches run without a synchronous batch loop. Around it sit ensemble feature selection work — fastVoteR ranking, embedded ensemble selection, result combination — and performance work on objective evaluation.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run in parallel: scaling the search itself through async execution and the rush backend, and making ensemble selection results easier to analyse via Pareto fronts, knee points and now removal of empty result rows. The rush backward-compatibility shim was dropped in 1.6.0, so the async path is now the assumed one.
◆ Prediction
Expect the ensemble result API to keep gaining analysis helpers, with async execution treated as the default rather than an option.
workflows
0.0ANALYTICS
The tidymodels pipeline grew a third stage, and it happens after the model runs.
◆ Current state
workflows bundles a preprocessor and a model into one object that tidymodels can fit, tune and extract from. Version 1.3.0 added a post stage backed by the tailor package, wired through every generic a workflow supports — augment, tidy, tunable, tune_args, required_pkgs and parameter extraction. Version 1.2.0 added sparse data support so fit() and predict() accept dgCMatrix and sparse tibbles. Earlier releases in view are boundary tightening: erroring on unknown model modes, on trained recipes, and on silently ignored formula offsets.
◆ Where it's heading
The object is filling out into a complete pipeline description rather than a preprocessing-plus-model pair. Postprocessing is the structural addition — calibration and threshold selection were previously done by hand after prediction, outside anything tidymodels could tune or record — and the fact that it arrived integrated with tunable() and tune_args() rather than as a standalone step is the point. The rest of the arc is the steady tidymodels habit of converting silent guesses into errors.
◆ Prediction
Expect tailor postprocessors to spread through tune and workflowsets next, since the parameter and tuning generics were wired up first, and expect sparse support to extend to more engines after lightgbm.
Alternatives to mlr3fselect and workflows
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mlr3fselect or workflows.
textrecipes
Text features finally stay sparse all the way to the model.
probably
The package that made calibration a step instead of an afterthought.
workflowsets
workflowsets keeps widening what counts as a model worth comparing.
vetiver
Posit's MLOps package went quiet for two years, then came back to keep up with recipes.
patchwork
patchwork stopped being a ggplot composer and became a page composer.
See all mlr3fselect alternatives → · See all workflows alternatives →
Recent activity from mlr3fselect and workflows
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agomlr3fselectEmpty-selection rows removable from ensemble results
- 8mo agomlr3fselectFaster objective evaluation and always_included roles
- 11mo agoworkflowsWorkflows gain a postprocessing stage via tailor ⚡
- 1y agomlr3fselectAsynchronous feature selection arrives with FSelectorAsync ⚡
- 1y agoworkflowsSparse matrices work through fit() and predict()
- 1y agomlr3fselectEmbedded ensemble selection and result combination
- 1y agomlr3fselectInternal tuning callback added
- 1y agomlr3fselectmlr3 0.21.0 compatibility and archive slimming
- 2y agoworkflowsaugment() aligns with parsnip; censored regression supported
- 3y agoworkflowsRegister tuning generics unconditionally
- 3y agoworkflowsMissing parsnip extensions now error early; unsupervised specs supported
- 3y agoworkflowsMode guessing removed; silent offset handling now errors
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between mlr3fselect and workflows?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. mlr3fselect and workflows are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is mlr3fselect better than workflows?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mlr3fselect and workflows are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to mlr3fselect?
Top mlr3fselect alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mlr3fselect alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mlr3fselect for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to workflows?
Top workflows alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "workflows alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/workflows-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.