← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

Greenbone Vulnerability Manager vs Dashy

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Greenbone Vulnerability Manager and Dashy — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Greenbone Vulnerability Manager vs Dashy: at a glance

FeatureGreenbone Vulnerability ManagerDashy
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score6.36.3
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesvulnerability management, web application scanning, gmp protocol, report modelingself-hosted, homelab-dashboard, dependency-bumps, oidc
Last editorial update3h ago20h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Greenbone Vulnerability Manager?

Greenbone's scanner daemon is growing a web-application scanning class beside its network roots.

gvmd releases every week or two, and the changelog splits cleanly in three: a sustained build-out of web application scanning, a rewrite of how reports are modeled and exported, and a long tail of memory-management fixes in the C core. Recent versions added web application scanner preferences, scanner verification, and a Web Application VT subtype with a database migration. The report work moved from ad-hoc XML toward a structured report model addressable through new GMP commands.

Read the full Greenbone Vulnerability Manager trajectory →

What is Dashy?

After 4.5.0's drag-and-drop release, the version number is outrunning the product.

Dashy shipped 4.5.0 in late July with drag-and-drop editing and a new widget, and everything since has been patch work. Across the six most recent releases, three are automated dependency bumps, one adds missing German translations, one fixes an out-of-memory crash, and one adds an OIDC post-logout redirect. Releases land every one to three days, each cut from a single pull request. Maintenance is visibly split between the project owner and a dependency bot.

Read the full Dashy trajectory →

Greenbone Vulnerability Manager vs Dashy: editorial side-by-side

G6.3

Greenbone's scanner daemon is growing a web-application scanning class beside its network roots.

◆ Current state

gvmd releases every week or two, and the changelog splits cleanly in three: a sustained build-out of web application scanning, a rewrite of how reports are modeled and exported, and a long tail of memory-management fixes in the C core. Recent versions added web application scanner preferences, scanner verification, and a Web Application VT subtype with a database migration. The report work moved from ad-hoc XML toward a structured report model addressable through new GMP commands.

◆ Where it's heading

Greenbone is widening what gvmd can orchestrate. Network and container scanning were the existing surface; web application scanning is being brought to parity, with its own VT class, preferences, validation, and verification path. In parallel the GMP protocol is gaining first-class report retrieval commands, which makes report data consumable by tooling rather than only renderable. The bug-fix stream is dominated by frees and cleanup in long-lived report paths, the signature of a codebase under memory pressure at scale.

◆ Prediction

Web Application VTs now have a subtype, a migration, and scanner verification, but the audit and scan report commands were added separately; expect the report model work to fold web application results into the same structured retrieval path rather than leaving a parallel one.

D
Dashy
INFRA · APIS
6.3

After 4.5.0's drag-and-drop release, the version number is outrunning the product.

◆ Current state

Dashy shipped 4.5.0 in late July with drag-and-drop editing and a new widget, and everything since has been patch work. Across the six most recent releases, three are automated dependency bumps, one adds missing German translations, one fixes an out-of-memory crash, and one adds an OIDC post-logout redirect. Releases land every one to three days, each cut from a single pull request. Maintenance is visibly split between the project owner and a dependency bot.

◆ Where it's heading

The cadence follows a repeating shape: a feature release, then a long tail of single-PR patches, and 4.5 is deep into that tail. The human-authored work skews toward self-hosting operations - authentication flows and crash fixes - rather than the dashboard surface itself. That fits a project whose users run their own instance and care most about it staying up between restarts.

◆ Prediction

Expect the 4.5.x train to keep releasing roughly per merged pull request until a 4.6.0 gathers the next batch of user-facing features; on this evidence the intervening entries will be dependency bumps with occasional auth and stability fixes.

Alternatives to Greenbone Vulnerability Manager and Dashy

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Greenbone Vulnerability Manager or Dashy.

See all Greenbone Vulnerability Manager alternatives → · See all Dashy alternatives →

Recent activity from Greenbone Vulnerability Manager and Dashy

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoDashyv4.5.7: dependency bot bumps a group of nine
  2. 2d agoDashyv4.5.6: fast-uri dependency bump
  3. 5d agoGreenbone Vulnerability Manageropenvasd library bumped to 23.9
  4. 5d agoGreenbone Vulnerability ManagerGMP gains a get_audit_report_hosts command
  5. 5d agoDashyv4.5.5: missing German translations added
  6. 7d agoDashyv4.5.4: fixes an out-of-memory crash from leaked listeners
  7. 8d agoDashyv4.5.3: two dependency bumps
  8. 10d agoDashyv4.5.2: OIDC post-logout redirect URI support
  9. 10d agoGreenbone Vulnerability ManagerWeb Application VTs become a first-class scan type
  10. 18d agoGreenbone Vulnerability ManagerStructured report model and the get_scan_report command
  11. 19d agoGreenbone Vulnerability ManagerPer-object asset permissions and report-script trust checks
  12. 24d agoGreenbone Vulnerability ManagerAggregate grouping and family-name fixes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Greenbone Vulnerability Manager and Dashy?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Greenbone Vulnerability Manager and Dashy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Greenbone Vulnerability Manager better than Dashy?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Greenbone Vulnerability Manager and Dashy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Greenbone Vulnerability Manager?

Top Greenbone Vulnerability Manager alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Greenbone Vulnerability Manager alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/greenbone-gvmd for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Dashy?

Top Dashy alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Dashy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dashy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.