pr2database
The protist reference database keeps widening past the rRNA gene it was built on.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of gofedf and jSDM — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
A two-test goodness-of-fit package opens itself up to any weight function
gofedf runs goodness-of-fit tests built on the empirical distribution function. Its three releases trace a short, clean arc: existence in 2023, then p-values computed from an analytical solution of the integral equation in 2024, then in 2026 a user-supplied weight function that replaces the fixed menu. Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling are now two points in a family rather than the two options.
Joint species distribution models in Gibbs-sampled C++, quiet since 2023.
jSDM fits joint species distribution models by Gibbs sampling, with the sampler written in C++ against GSL and Armadillo and exposed through binomial probit, binomial logit, Poisson log and Gaussian entry points. The 0.2 line extended it with species traits, constrained factor loadings and residual-association plots. The one entry since 2023 carries only a compare link.
gofedf runs goodness-of-fit tests built on the empirical distribution function. Its three releases trace a short, clean arc: existence in 2023, then p-values computed from an analytical solution of the integral equation in 2024, then in 2026 a user-supplied weight function that replaces the fixed menu. Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling are now two points in a family rather than the two options.
The package is generalising rather than accumulating. Each release removed a hard-coded decision: first how eigenvalues are computed, offering both the analytical route and a matrix approximation; then which weight function defines the statistic at all. The maintainer's own framing in 1.1.0 is a contrast against what earlier versions would not let you do, which is the shape of a package aiming to become a framework.
An arbitrary weight function is the extensibility point that matters for EDF tests; what it lacks is calibration guidance, since Type I error behaviour was the argued benefit of the analytical eigenvalue route. Documented recommendations or diagnostics for user-chosen weights are the natural follow-up, though the entries do not announce one.
jSDM fits joint species distribution models by Gibbs sampling, with the sampler written in C++ against GSL and Armadillo and exposed through binomial probit, binomial logit, Poisson log and Gaussian entry points. The 0.2 line extended it with species traits, constrained factor loadings and residual-association plots. The one entry since 2023 carries only a compare link.
The package built out its model family quickly and then stopped: five of the six visible entries are stamped the same day as a backfilled archive, and the only later release says nothing about its contents. The direction the 0.2 line was heading, toward trait-mediated species effects and better convergence on latent variable models, has no visible continuation.
The feed does not support a confident prediction; the latest entry publishes no notes, so whether the package is still developing or only being kept CRAN-clean cannot be read from it.
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gofedf or jSDM.
The protist reference database keeps widening past the rRNA gene it was built on.
Composable aligned layouts, rebuilt on S7 while ggplot2 4.0 lands underneath.
Conservation planning absorbs the literature's target-setting rules as code.
An ecosystem model starts tracking carbon isotopes and land-use change.
Ten years in, US mapping splits its data out and finally adds Puerto Rico.
Fitness-tracking analysis in slow maintenance, still absorbing upstream breakage.
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. gofedf and jSDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gofedf and jSDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
Top gofedf alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gofedf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gofedf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top jSDM alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "jSDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/jsdm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.