INFRA · APIS
The D-score reference implementation rebuilt its measurement foundation on seven countries.
Alternatives · developer tools
gofedf alternatives
The best gofedf alternatives in developer tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.
Updated Aug 20, 2026
Looking for the best alternatives to gofedf? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in developer tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, gofedf shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 0.0 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.
About gofedf
A two-test goodness-of-fit package opens itself up to any weight function
gofedf runs goodness-of-fit tests built on the empirical distribution function. Its three releases trace a short, clean arc: existence in 2023, then p-values computed from an analytical solution of the integral equation in 2024, then in 2026 a user-supplied weight function that replaces the fixed menu. Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling are now two points in a family rather than the two options.
Velocity 0.0 · Last update 51m ago
Top 12 alternatives to gofedf
Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.
INFRA · APIS
A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.
INFRA · APIS
A gene-set enrichment package that outgrew its human-only origins, then went quiet.
INFRA · APIS
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
INFRA · APIS
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
INFRA · APIS
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
INFRA · APIS
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
INFRA · APIS
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
INFRA · APIS
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
INFRA · APIS
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it
INFRA · APIS
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
INFRA · APIS
CRAN download analytics maintained one micro-change at a time, hundreds per year
gofedf vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance
Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.
| Product | Velocity | Sparks · 30d | Focus areas | Latest release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gofedf (baseline) | 0.0 | 0 | goodness-of-fitempirical-distributionhypothesis-testing | User-supplied weight functions for Cramer-von Mises tests |
| dscore | 0.0 | 0 | child-developmentpsychometricsglobal-health | dscore 2.0.0 |
| ggfootball | 0.0 | 0 | sports-analyticsr-packagedata-scraping | ggfootball 0.3.0 |
| goat | 0.0 | 0 | bioinformaticsgene-set-analysisr-package | Gene sets beyond human, and analyses you can reload |
| rollupTree | 0.0 | 0 | recursive-computationtree-structuresdag | — |
| massProps | 0.0 | 0 | systems-engineeringmass-propertiesuncertainty-propagation | — |
| writeAlizer | 0.0 | 0 | writing-assessmentnlp-featuresmodel-artifacts | — |
| samplr | 0.0 | 0 | cognitive-sciencesampling-algorithmsmcmc | — |
| stochvol | 0.0 | 0 | bayesian-inferencestochastic-volatilitymcmc | — |
| midr | 0.0 | 0 | explainable-aisurrogate-modelsshapley | Matrix responses bring multi-class and survival models in scope |
| GeoThinneR | 0.0 | 0 | spatial-thinningspecies-distributionoccurrence-data | GeoThinned result objects and a reorganised method surface |
| selection.index | 0.0 | 0 | plant-breedingselection-indexgenomic-selection | Genomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core |
| packageRank | 0.0 | 0 | crandownload-analyticslog-filtering | — |
The 12 best gofedf alternatives, in depth
1. dscore · velocity 0.0
The D-score reference implementation rebuilt its measurement foundation on seven countries.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “dscore 2.0.0”.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, dscore focuses on child development, psychometrics and global health.
dscore and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
2. ggfootball · velocity 0.0
A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “ggfootball 0.3.0”.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, ggfootball focuses on sports analytics, r package and data scraping.
ggfootball and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full ggfootball trajectory → · Compare gofedf vs ggfootball →
3. goat · velocity 0.0
A gene-set enrichment package that outgrew its human-only origins, then went quiet.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Gene sets beyond human, and analyses you can reload”.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, goat focuses on bioinformatics, gene set analysis and r package.
goat and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
4. rollupTree · velocity 0.0
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, rollupTree focuses on recursive computation, tree structures and dag.
rollupTree and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full rollupTree trajectory → · Compare gofedf vs rollupTree →
5. massProps · velocity 0.0
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, massProps focuses on systems engineering, mass properties and uncertainty propagation.
massProps and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
6. writeAlizer · velocity 0.0
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, writeAlizer focuses on writing assessment, nlp features and model artifacts.
writeAlizer and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full writeAlizer trajectory → · Compare gofedf vs writeAlizer →
7. samplr · velocity 0.0
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, samplr focuses on cognitive science, sampling algorithms and mcmc.
samplr and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
8. stochvol · velocity 0.0
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, stochvol focuses on bayesian inference, stochastic volatility and mcmc.
stochvol and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
9. midr · velocity 0.0
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Matrix responses bring multi-class and survival models in scope”.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, midr focuses on explainable ai, surrogate models and shapley.
midr and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
10. GeoThinneR · velocity 0.0
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “GeoThinned result objects and a reorganised method surface”.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, GeoThinneR focuses on spatial thinning, species distribution and occurrence data.
GeoThinneR and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full GeoThinneR trajectory → · Compare gofedf vs GeoThinneR →
11. selection.index · velocity 0.0
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Genomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core”.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, selection.index focuses on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection.
selection.index and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full selection.index trajectory → · Compare gofedf vs selection.index →
12. packageRank · velocity 0.0
CRAN download analytics maintained one micro-change at a time, hundreds per year.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where gofedf leans on goodness of fit, empirical distribution and hypothesis testing, packageRank focuses on cran, download analytics and log filtering.
packageRank and gofedf have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full packageRank trajectory → · Compare gofedf vs packageRank →
Frequently asked questions
What are the best alternatives to gofedf?
The top gofedf alternatives we currently track in developer tools are dscore, ggfootball, goat, rollupTree, massProps, ranked by recent ship velocity.
How is this list of gofedf alternatives ranked?
Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.
Can I compare gofedf directly with one of these alternatives?
Yes — every card has a "Compare with gofedf" link to a side-by-side /compare page.