gps2gtfs
gps2gtfs spent a release making its docs stop describing functions it does not have.
Comparison · Analytics
glyanno vs pedbuildr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of glyanno and pedbuildr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
glyanno vs pedbuildr: at a glance
What is glyanno?
Glycan annotation stops depending on the database having seen the structure before.
glyanno resolves mass spectrometry observations into glycan compositions and structures, converting between m/z, composition and structure, filling in missing detail on partial structures, and mapping results to GlyTouCan accessions. The newest release adds de novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, falling back to the topological database only when reconstruction is not possible. Batch performance was reworked at the same time, with vector inputs reusing prepared databases and direct lookups instead of repeating setup per element.
What is pedbuildr?
pedbuildr reconstructs pedigrees from DNA, and it just got much faster at the search.
pedbuildr infers pedigree structure from marker data by scoring candidate pedigrees against likelihoods. Version 0.4.0 moved reconstruct() to mirai for parallel likelihood computation, deprecated the old numCores argument, and picked up the improved loop breaking from pedtools and pedprobr, which lets many complex looped pedigrees succeed where they previously failed. buildPeds() also got significantly faster in its default configuration where mating between lineally related individuals is disallowed.
glyanno vs pedbuildr: editorial side-by-side
glyanno
3.8ANALYTICS
Glycan annotation stops depending on the database having seen the structure before.
◆ Current state
glyanno resolves mass spectrometry observations into glycan compositions and structures, converting between m/z, composition and structure, filling in missing detail on partial structures, and mapping results to GlyTouCan accessions. The newest release adds de novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, falling back to the topological database only when reconstruction is not possible. Batch performance was reworked at the same time, with vector inputs reusing prepared databases and direct lookups instead of repeating setup per element.
◆ Where it's heading
The consistent theme is making ambiguous results honest and predictable. return_best moved from returning a shortened tibble to a vector aligned with the input, with NA for unmatched glycans; matching concrete compositions against a generic database now errors instead of silently returning nothing; zero-length database arguments are rejected. Alongside that, functions belonging elsewhere have been pushed down into glyrepr rather than duplicated, which is the same boundary discipline visible across this cohort. Version churn is largely driven by upstream: two of the last six entries exist to absorb breaking changes in glyrepr.
◆ Prediction
De novo reconstruction currently covers topological N-glycans only, so extending it to other structure levels or to O-glycans is the natural next step. The performance work suggests batch annotation of full experiments is now the primary use being optimised for.
pedbuildr
0.0ANALYTICS
pedbuildr reconstructs pedigrees from DNA, and it just got much faster at the search.
◆ Current state
pedbuildr infers pedigree structure from marker data by scoring candidate pedigrees against likelihoods. Version 0.4.0 moved reconstruct() to mirai for parallel likelihood computation, deprecated the old numCores argument, and picked up the improved loop breaking from pedtools and pedprobr, which lets many complex looped pedigrees succeed where they previously failed. buildPeds() also got significantly faster in its default configuration where mating between lineally related individuals is disallowed.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is bounded by two costs: how many candidate pedigrees it enumerates and how expensive each likelihood is. The recent release attacks both, parallelizing the likelihoods and speeding up enumeration in the common case. The earlier 0.3.0 release worked on the other end, adding inbreeding limits and a proper result class so the output of a large search is manageable. Releases are infrequent, roughly three years apart in this window.
◆ Prediction
Expect the candidate generation side to receive the same attention the likelihood side just did, since search space size is the remaining bound on what pedbuildr can reconstruct.
Alternatives to glyanno and pedbuildr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either glyanno or pedbuildr.
ducksemantics
ducksemantics puts an ontology graph and ColBERT retrieval inside DuckDB, callable from R.
dvir
dvir keeps making disaster victim identification a single call instead of a workflow.
forrel
forrel is getting faster at the simulations forensic kinship work actually spends its time on.
pedFamilias
pedFamilias exists to read one legacy file format, and it has that job nearly finished.
pedmut
pedmut turns awkward mutation models into ones the likelihood engine can actually handle.
See all glyanno alternatives → · See all pedbuildr alternatives →
Recent activity from glyanno and pedbuildr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 24d agoglyannoDe novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, with database fallback ⚡
- 1mo agopedbuildrmirai parallelism and faster pedigree enumeration
- 3mo agoglyannoGlyTouCan accession mapping and anomeric position filling
- 3mo agoglyannoFixes an enhance_struc() break from glyrepr 0.11.0
- 4mo agoglyannoExplicit empty return from com_to_struc()
- 4mo agoglyannoreturn_best output aligns with input length; silent empty matches now error
- 5mo agoglyannoto_level parameter removed from enhance_struc()
- 2y agopedbuildrpedCollection class and an inbreeding ceiling
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between glyanno and pedbuildr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. glyanno is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is glyanno better than pedbuildr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. glyanno is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to glyanno?
Top glyanno alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "glyanno alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glyanno for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to pedbuildr?
Top pedbuildr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "pedbuildr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/pedbuildr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.