← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

FusionAuth vs Z-Wave JS UI

A side-by-side editorial comparison of FusionAuth and Z-Wave JS UI — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

FusionAuth vs Z-Wave JS UI: at a glance

FeatureFusionAuthZ-Wave JS UI
SectorDevOpsDevOps
Velocity score2.55.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesauthentication, identity, oauth, securitysmart home, z-wave, home assistant, self-hosted
Last editorial update2mo ago11h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is FusionAuth?

FusionAuth adds RFC 8707 resource-scoped tokens while most recent changelogs surface only upgrade boilerplate.

FusionAuth's changelog data is thinly populated — most entries show only the standard upgrade recommendation with no detailed content. The substantive releases are 1.67.0 (RFC 8707 resource indicators for OAuth tokens, enabling per-resource audience scoping in the `aud` claim) and 1.66.0 (webhook endpoint security hardening requiring global API keys, a breaking change). FusionAuth is an open-source, self-hosted identity platform in consistent quarterly release cadence.

Read the full FusionAuth trajectory →

What is Z-Wave JS UI?

Z-Wave JS UI 11.26 picks up zwave-js 15.32 and finishes the move to Node 24.

Z-Wave JS UI mostly tracks the zwave-js driver. 11.26.0 bumps zwave-js to 15.32.1 and moves the TypeScript base config to Node 24, completing the move that started with the Node 24 Docker image in 11.25.0. 11.25.2 had fixed self-signed certificates Node 24 rejected.

Read the full Z-Wave JS UI trajectory →

FusionAuth vs Z-Wave JS UI: editorial side-by-side

F2.5

FusionAuth adds RFC 8707 resource-scoped tokens while most recent changelogs surface only upgrade boilerplate.

◆ Current state

FusionAuth's changelog data is thinly populated — most entries show only the standard upgrade recommendation with no detailed content. The substantive releases are 1.67.0 (RFC 8707 resource indicators for OAuth tokens, enabling per-resource audience scoping in the `aud` claim) and 1.66.0 (webhook endpoint security hardening requiring global API keys, a breaking change). FusionAuth is an open-source, self-hosted identity platform in consistent quarterly release cadence.

◆ Where it's heading

RFC 8707 implementation and the webhook endpoint security hardening both point toward a standards-compliance and security posture focus rather than surface feature expansion. The breaking change in 1.66.0 prioritizing security correctness over backward compatibility signals a product that prioritizes operational security for self-hosters. Version naming with code names (Intelligent Kamfa, Tenant Manager SSO Tasmanian Mountain Skink) is purely cosmetic.

◆ Prediction

Standards compliance is the clearest trajectory — RFC implementations tend to cluster. FAPI 2.0 or OAuth 2.0 Rich Authorization Requests are likely candidates given the resource-scoping direction in RFC 8707.

Z5.0

Z-Wave JS UI 11.26 picks up zwave-js 15.32 and finishes the move to Node 24.

◆ Current state

Z-Wave JS UI mostly tracks the zwave-js driver. 11.26.0 bumps zwave-js to 15.32.1 and moves the TypeScript base config to Node 24, completing the move that started with the Node 24 Docker image in 11.25.0. 11.25.2 had fixed self-signed certificates Node 24 rejected.

◆ Where it's heading

Releases follow upstream zwave-js versions, with occasional UI feature releases like 11.25.0 in between. Device support changes arrive through the driver rather than the UI.

◆ Prediction

Expect further zwave-js patch bumps; a UI-level feature release is less predictable from this feed.

Alternatives to FusionAuth and Z-Wave JS UI

Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either FusionAuth or Z-Wave JS UI.

See all FusionAuth alternatives → · See all Z-Wave JS UI alternatives →

Recent activity from FusionAuth and Z-Wave JS UI

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 14h agoZ-Wave JS UIZ-Wave JS UI 11.26.0 moves to zwave-js 15.32.1
  2. 14d agoZ-Wave JS UI11.25.2: regenerates self-signed certs Node 24 rejected
  3. 17d agoZ-Wave JS UI11.25.1: zwave-js 15.31.2 and Node 24.22.1
  4. 19d agoZ-Wave JS UI11.25.0: config entity defaults, better filters, Node 24 image
  5. 1mo agoZ-Wave JS UIZ-Wave JS UI 11.24.3 bumps zwave-js to 15.31.1
  6. 1mo agoZ-Wave JS UIZ-Wave JS UI 11.24.2 pulls in zwave-js 15.31 and server 3.11
  7. 2mo agoFusionAuthFusionAuth 1.69.1
  8. 3mo agoFusionAuthFusionAuth 1.69.0
  9. 4mo agoFusionAuthFusionAuth 1.68.0
  10. 5mo agoFusionAuthFusionAuth 1.67.1
  11. 5mo agoFusionAuthFusionAuth 1.67.0: RFC 8707 resource scoping for tokens
  12. 6mo agoFusionAuthFusionAuth 1.66.0: webhook endpoints require global API key

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between FusionAuth and Z-Wave JS UI?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Z-Wave JS UI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is FusionAuth better than Z-Wave JS UI?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Z-Wave JS UI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to FusionAuth?

Top FusionAuth alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "FusionAuth alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fusionauth for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Z-Wave JS UI?

Top Z-Wave JS UI alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Z-Wave JS UI alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/zwave-js-ui for the full list with editorial commentary on each.