← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Fulcrum vs leaflet

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Fulcrum and leaflet — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Fulcrum vs leaflet: at a glance

FeatureFulcrumleaflet
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score6.30.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesfield-data-collection, esri-arcgis, offline-maps, on-device-inferencemapping, geospatial, sf-migration, licensing
Last editorial update15h ago48m ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Fulcrum?

Fulcrum's mobile train is all Esri migration cleanup, with on-device inference quietly changing format.

Fulcrum ships iOS, Android, and web releases on a near-weekly cadence, and this stretch is dominated by mapping work following the Google Maps retirement announced for September. Recent builds upgraded to ArcGIS SDK 300.0.0, moved the web map engine to current ArcGIS and deck.gl versions, and worked through the resulting stability issues — basemap loading, location resolution, black map screens, panning and zooming performance. The most consequential change is easy to miss: ONNX support for on-device machine learning inference was removed in favor of a new INFERENCE format that reads labels from an uploaded labels.txt.

Read the full Fulcrum trajectory →

What is leaflet?

leaflet relicensed to MIT and finished migrating off R's retired spatial stack

leaflet is the R binding for the Leaflet mapping library. Its recent releases are dominated by one long migration: away from sp, rgdal, rgeos and raster, and toward sf and terra. Version 2.2.3 completed the user-facing half of that - sp is no longer installed by default, and bundled datasets ship as sf objects - while also relicensing the package from GPL-2 to MIT.

Read the full leaflet trajectory →

Fulcrum vs leaflet: editorial side-by-side

F
Fulcrum
ANALYTICS
6.3

Fulcrum's mobile train is all Esri migration cleanup, with on-device inference quietly changing format.

◆ Current state

Fulcrum ships iOS, Android, and web releases on a near-weekly cadence, and this stretch is dominated by mapping work following the Google Maps retirement announced for September. Recent builds upgraded to ArcGIS SDK 300.0.0, moved the web map engine to current ArcGIS and deck.gl versions, and worked through the resulting stability issues — basemap loading, location resolution, black map screens, panning and zooming performance. The most consequential change is easy to miss: ONNX support for on-device machine learning inference was removed in favor of a new INFERENCE format that reads labels from an uploaded labels.txt.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a platform consolidation being paid down one point release at a time. Having committed to Esri, Fulcrum is absorbing the instability that came with it, and each release reads as fixes to symptoms of the same migration. Underneath, the offline and field-capture story continues to get real attention — downloaded offline map layers can now be updated in place, and Photo FastFill moved to background processing so it no longer blocks editing.

◆ Prediction

Expect the release notes to stay fix-dominated through the September Google Maps cutoff, with the migration-related map defects tapering after it passes. Photo FastFill leaving early access is the most likely next substantive item.

L
leaflet
ANALYTICS
0.0

leaflet relicensed to MIT and finished migrating off R's retired spatial stack

◆ Current state

leaflet is the R binding for the Leaflet mapping library. Its recent releases are dominated by one long migration: away from sp, rgdal, rgeos and raster, and toward sf and terra. Version 2.2.3 completed the user-facing half of that - sp is no longer installed by default, and bundled datasets ship as sf objects - while also relicensing the package from GPL-2 to MIT.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a package being brought into line with an ecosystem that changed underneath it. The retirement of rgdal and rgeos forced the terra and sf work; the license change and dependency reductions are the maintainers taking the opportunity to clean up while they are already in there. Feature work, such as the full viridisLite palette set, arrives as a side effect of the tidying.

◆ Prediction

With the sp path now opt-in and the retired geospatial dependencies gone, expect the remaining work to be small: palette and provider-tile handling, and keeping the bundled JavaScript current.

Alternatives to Fulcrum and leaflet

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Fulcrum or leaflet.

See all Fulcrum alternatives → · See all leaflet alternatives →

Recent activity from Fulcrum and leaflet

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 23h agoFulcrumAndroid: update offline map layers in place, non-blocking Photo FastFill
  2. 1d agoFulcrumiOS fix: slow location resolution blocked record saves
  3. 6d agoFulcrumWeb: SSO email wording and ArcGIS/deck.gl version bumps
  4. 7d agoFulcrumAndroid fixes: ArcGIS stability, signature button, photo markup
  5. 7d agoFulcrumiOS fixes: basemap loading and black map screen
  6. 8d agoFulcrumiOS: ArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 and ONNX replaced by a new INFERENCE format
  7. 11mo agoleafletMIT relicensing and sp dropped from default installs
  8. 2y agoleafletterra CRS handling fixed; raster images accept layer options
  9. 2y agoleafletProvider tile dependency is cacheable by knitr again
  10. 2y agoleafletAdds terra support and removes rgdal and rgeos
  11. 3y agoleafletUpdates proj4.js and fixes examples to stay on CRAN

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Fulcrum and leaflet?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Fulcrum better than leaflet?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Fulcrum?

Top Fulcrum alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fulcrum alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fulcrum for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to leaflet?

Top leaflet alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "leaflet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/leaflet-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.