← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

leaflet vs pins

A side-by-side editorial comparison of leaflet and pins — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

leaflet vs pins: at a glance

Featureleafletpins
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmapping, geospatial, sf-migration, licensingdata-versioning, cloud-storage, databricks, serialization
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is leaflet?

leaflet relicensed to MIT and finished migrating off R's retired spatial stack

leaflet is the R binding for the Leaflet mapping library. Its recent releases are dominated by one long migration: away from sp, rgdal, rgeos and raster, and toward sf and terra. Version 2.2.3 completed the user-facing half of that - sp is no longer installed by default, and bundled datasets ship as sf objects - while also relicensing the package from GPL-2 to MIT.

Read the full leaflet trajectory →

What is pins?

pins keeps adding a storage backend per release while retiring its original API

pins publishes and versions R objects to a board, where a board is whatever storage you have. The recent releases read as a steady list of new boards - Google Cloud Storage, Google Drive, Databricks Volumes, Connect vanity URLs - alongside serialization changes that track which formats R users actually want: parquet via nanoparquet, and qs replaced by qs2.

Read the full pins trajectory →

leaflet vs pins: editorial side-by-side

L
leaflet
ANALYTICS
0.0

leaflet relicensed to MIT and finished migrating off R's retired spatial stack

◆ Current state

leaflet is the R binding for the Leaflet mapping library. Its recent releases are dominated by one long migration: away from sp, rgdal, rgeos and raster, and toward sf and terra. Version 2.2.3 completed the user-facing half of that - sp is no longer installed by default, and bundled datasets ship as sf objects - while also relicensing the package from GPL-2 to MIT.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a package being brought into line with an ecosystem that changed underneath it. The retirement of rgdal and rgeos forced the terra and sf work; the license change and dependency reductions are the maintainers taking the opportunity to clean up while they are already in there. Feature work, such as the full viridisLite palette set, arrives as a side effect of the tidying.

◆ Prediction

With the sp path now opt-in and the retired geospatial dependencies gone, expect the remaining work to be small: palette and provider-tile handling, and keeping the bundled JavaScript current.

P
pins
ANALYTICS
0.0

pins keeps adding a storage backend per release while retiring its original API

◆ Current state

pins publishes and versions R objects to a board, where a board is whatever storage you have. The recent releases read as a steady list of new boards - Google Cloud Storage, Google Drive, Databricks Volumes, Connect vanity URLs - alongside serialization changes that track which formats R users actually want: parquet via nanoparquet, and qs replaced by qs2.

◆ Where it's heading

Two long-running processes, neither dramatic. Backend coverage expands toward wherever teams already store artifacts, which increasingly means Databricks and cloud object storage rather than a shared drive. Meanwhile the legacy pin() API from before the board model has been in a staged deprecation across at least three releases, escalated each time rather than removed.

◆ Prediction

Expect another board or two as storage platforms are requested, and the legacy pin() functions to finally become errors; the format list will keep tracking whichever serializer the R community settles on.

Alternatives to leaflet and pins

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either leaflet or pins.

See all leaflet alternatives → · See all pins alternatives →

Recent activity from leaflet and pins

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5mo agopinsqs2 replaces qs; pins can be written in multiple formats
  2. 11mo agoleafletMIT relicensing and sp dropped from default installs
  3. 1y agopinsPin previews on Connect; Databricks host normalization
  4. 1y agopinsAdds board_databricks() and switches parquet to nanoparquet
  5. 2y agoleafletterra CRS handling fixed; raster images accept layer options
  6. 2y agoleafletProvider tile dependency is cacheable by knitr again
  7. 2y agopinspin_write() arguments must be named; Connect caches removed
  8. 2y agopinsMessage clarity and Google Drive dribble handling
  9. 2y agoleafletAdds terra support and removes rgdal and rgeos
  10. 2y agopinsboard_gdrive() added; cache location configurable
  11. 3y agoleafletUpdates proj4.js and fixes examples to stay on CRAN

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between leaflet and pins?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. leaflet and pins are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is leaflet better than pins?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. leaflet and pins are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to leaflet?

Top leaflet alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "leaflet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/leaflet-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to pins?

Top pins alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "pins alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/pins-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.