r2rtf
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
Comparison · Analytics
forestly vs mirai
A side-by-side editorial comparison of forestly and mirai — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
forestly vs mirai: at a glance
What is forestly?
forestly built an interactive safety review tool, then taught it to produce submission-ready RTF.
forestly renders adverse-event forest plots as interactive reactable widgets — filterable by AE category, with sliders for incidence thresholds and a toggle for the risk-difference column. Version 0.1.3 added `rtf_static_forestly()` for static RTF output, and 0.1.4 has been about giving the display owner control over what reviewers see: the CSV download button, the AE filter label, and the diff toggle can each be switched off.
What is mirai?
mirai removed its dispatcher process and added memory backpressure to the queue.
The async evaluation framework releases roughly monthly and moves fast at the architecture level. In 2.7.0 the dispatcher stopped being a separate process and became a thread, after its loop had already been rewritten in C inside nanonext one release earlier. The same release added an opt-in memory budget for queued task payloads and try_mirai(), which returns NULL immediately rather than blocking when that budget is exhausted.
forestly vs mirai: editorial side-by-side
forestly
0.0ANALYTICS
forestly built an interactive safety review tool, then taught it to produce submission-ready RTF.
◆ Current state
forestly renders adverse-event forest plots as interactive reactable widgets — filterable by AE category, with sliders for incidence thresholds and a toggle for the risk-difference column. Version 0.1.3 added `rtf_static_forestly()` for static RTF output, and 0.1.4 has been about giving the display owner control over what reviewers see: the CSV download button, the AE filter label, and the diff toggle can each be switched off.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc runs from a fixed interactive widget toward a configurable one with two output modes. Nearly every new argument in the last two releases exists to remove something from the display or relabel it, which suggests the users driving development are producing outputs for others to review under conventions they do not control. The x-axis range, column header, figure header and slider range arguments point the same way — this is a tool being fitted into standardised reporting rather than used ad hoc.
◆ Prediction
Given that the last two releases have consisted almost entirely of display-control arguments, the next is likely more of the same, applied to whichever parts of the interactive layout are still fixed.
mirai
2.5ANALYTICS
mirai removed its dispatcher process and added memory backpressure to the queue.
◆ Current state
The async evaluation framework releases roughly monthly and moves fast at the architecture level. In 2.7.0 the dispatcher stopped being a separate process and became a thread, after its loop had already been rewritten in C inside nanonext one release earlier. The same release added an opt-in memory budget for queued task payloads and try_mirai(), which returns NULL immediately rather than blocking when that budget is exhausted.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads of work run together: cutting overhead out of the task path — thread-based dispatcher, in-process transport for synchronous daemons, lower per-element dispatch cost in mirai_map() — and making the framework safe to embed in an event loop, where blocking the host R thread is not acceptable. Deployment reach is growing too, with http_config() launching remote daemons over HTTP APIs and auto-configuring for Posit Workbench. Each release pins a minimum nanonext version, so the two packages advance as one unit.
◆ Prediction
With backpressure in place but opt-in, the open question these notes leave is whether a default memory budget arrives; continued overhead reduction and Shiny-facing non-blocking paths are the safer bet.
Alternatives to forestly and mirai
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either forestly or mirai.
DoseFinding
New stewardship at openpharma, then two releases adding the methods MCP-Mod was missing
webmockr
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
crul
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
dendroNetwork
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
chattr
chattr deleted every LLM integration it had written and outsourced the lot to ellmer
See all forestly alternatives → · See all mirai alternatives →
Recent activity from forestly and mirai
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 25d agomiraiMap collection and daemon lifecycle fixes
- 2mo agomiraiAgent skill ships in-package; HTTP headers take over auth
- 3mo agomiraiDispatcher becomes a thread, and the queue gains a memory budget ⚡
- 5mo agomiraiParallel RNG seeding leaves experimental status
- 5mo agoforestlyDownload button, AE filter label and diff toggle become optional
- 6mo agomiraiRemote daemons over HTTP, and a C dispatcher loop
- 8mo agomiraiTelemetry span timing and daemon-switch fix
- 11mo agoforestlyStatic RTF forest plots join the interactive output ⚡
- 1y agoforestlyreactR 0.6.0 rendering fix and slider label control
- 2y agoforestlyTreatment group selection and rough-edge fixes
- 3y agoforestlyFirst release on GitHub and CRAN
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between forestly and mirai?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. mirai is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is forestly better than mirai?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mirai is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to forestly?
Top forestly alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forestly alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forestly for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to mirai?
Top mirai alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mirai alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mirai for the full list with editorial commentary on each.