r2rtf
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
Comparison · Analytics
chattr vs forestly
A side-by-side editorial comparison of chattr and forestly — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
chattr vs forestly: at a glance
What is chattr?
chattr deleted every LLM integration it had written and outsourced the lot to ellmer
chattr puts a large language model inside the RStudio IDE, either through a Shiny app or directly at the console. As of 0.3.0 it no longer talks to any model provider itself: all integration goes through ellmer, and the hand-written OpenAI, Databricks and LlamaGPT backends were removed. The package's supported model list is now whatever ellmer supports, and the Shiny app streams responses through ellmer rather than managing a background process.
What is forestly?
forestly built an interactive safety review tool, then taught it to produce submission-ready RTF.
forestly renders adverse-event forest plots as interactive reactable widgets — filterable by AE category, with sliders for incidence thresholds and a toggle for the risk-difference column. Version 0.1.3 added `rtf_static_forestly()` for static RTF output, and 0.1.4 has been about giving the display owner control over what reviewers see: the CSV download button, the AE filter label, and the diff toggle can each be switched off.
chattr vs forestly: editorial side-by-side
chattr
0.0ANALYTICS
chattr deleted every LLM integration it had written and outsourced the lot to ellmer
◆ Current state
chattr puts a large language model inside the RStudio IDE, either through a Shiny app or directly at the console. As of 0.3.0 it no longer talks to any model provider itself: all integration goes through ellmer, and the hand-written OpenAI, Databricks and LlamaGPT backends were removed. The package's supported model list is now whatever ellmer supports, and the Shiny app streams responses through ellmer rather than managing a background process.
◆ Where it's heading
The first two releases show why that happened. Each provider brought its own error formats, token discovery and response handling, and 0.2.0 is largely a list of per-provider repairs — OpenAI error parsing, Copilot token discovery and model defaults, a new Databricks foundation model backend. Maintaining that surface scales linearly with the number of providers, and the pivot to ellmer trades it for a single dependency. The cost shows up immediately in 0.3.1, which exists solely to absorb a change in ellmer's token object.
◆ Prediction
Expect chattr's releases to now track ellmer's, as 0.3.1 already does, with the package's own work concentrating on the IDE experience rather than model connectivity. New provider support will arrive without a chattr release at all.
forestly
0.0ANALYTICS
forestly built an interactive safety review tool, then taught it to produce submission-ready RTF.
◆ Current state
forestly renders adverse-event forest plots as interactive reactable widgets — filterable by AE category, with sliders for incidence thresholds and a toggle for the risk-difference column. Version 0.1.3 added `rtf_static_forestly()` for static RTF output, and 0.1.4 has been about giving the display owner control over what reviewers see: the CSV download button, the AE filter label, and the diff toggle can each be switched off.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc runs from a fixed interactive widget toward a configurable one with two output modes. Nearly every new argument in the last two releases exists to remove something from the display or relabel it, which suggests the users driving development are producing outputs for others to review under conventions they do not control. The x-axis range, column header, figure header and slider range arguments point the same way — this is a tool being fitted into standardised reporting rather than used ad hoc.
◆ Prediction
Given that the last two releases have consisted almost entirely of display-control arguments, the next is likely more of the same, applied to whichever parts of the interactive layout are still fixed.
Alternatives to chattr and forestly
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either chattr or forestly.
DoseFinding
New stewardship at openpharma, then two releases adding the methods MCP-Mod was missing
webmockr
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
crul
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
dendroNetwork
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
cloudml
Six years since the last functional change, and Google renamed the service it wraps in the release before that
See all chattr alternatives → · See all forestly alternatives →
Recent activity from chattr and forestly
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5mo agoforestlyDownload button, AE filter label and diff toggle become optional
- 11mo agoforestlyStatic RTF forest plots join the interactive output ⚡
- 0y agochattrAdapts to ellmer's token object change
- 1y agochattrAll model integration moves to ellmer, direct backends removed ⚡
- 1y agoforestlyreactR 0.6.0 rendering fix and slider label control
- 2y agochattrDatabricks foundation models added; per-provider error handling fixed
- 2y agoforestlyTreatment group selection and rough-edge fixes
- 2y agochattrFirst release: LLM chat in the RStudio console and app
- 3y agoforestlyFirst release on GitHub and CRAN
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between chattr and forestly?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. chattr and forestly are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is chattr better than forestly?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. chattr and forestly are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to chattr?
Top chattr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "chattr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/chattr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to forestly?
Top forestly alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forestly alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forestly for the full list with editorial commentary on each.