rjdqa
rjdqa keeps refining one screen: the seasonal adjustment quality dashboard
Comparison · Analytics
EpiNow2 vs NWCTrends
A side-by-side editorial comparison of EpiNow2 and NWCTrends — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
EpiNow2 vs NWCTrends: at a glance
What is EpiNow2?
EpiNow2 unified its model interface, then went back to deepen the estimators behind it
EpiNow2 estimates reproduction numbers, infections and delay distributions from incomplete epidemiological reporting data. 1.8.0 was the structural turning point: every main modelling function now returns a consistent S3 object with `fit`, `args` and `observations`, reachable through shared accessors. The releases either side of it work on estimator quality — accumulation of irregularly reported data in 1.7.0, and a substantial expansion of `estimate_truncation()` in 1.9.0.
What is NWCTrends?
The salmon status-review trend package, maintained one federal review cycle at a time
NWCTrends fits multivariate state-space trend models to Pacific salmon population data and generates the tables and figures used in NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center viability and status reviews. Its release history maps onto those review cycles rather than a development calendar: v1.0 carries the 2015 review code, v1.25 the 2020 review, v1.30 the changes since. The 2026 v1.31 is internal restructuring and a dependency swap.
EpiNow2 vs NWCTrends: editorial side-by-side
EpiNow2
0.0ANALYTICS
EpiNow2 unified its model interface, then went back to deepen the estimators behind it
◆ Current state
EpiNow2 estimates reproduction numbers, infections and delay distributions from incomplete epidemiological reporting data. 1.8.0 was the structural turning point: every main modelling function now returns a consistent S3 object with `fit`, `args` and `observations`, reachable through shared accessors. The releases either side of it work on estimator quality — accumulation of irregularly reported data in 1.7.0, and a substantial expansion of `estimate_truncation()` in 1.9.0.
◆ Where it's heading
The package spent this window paying down interface debt and is now extending from the tidier base. Options that existed only for `estimate_infections()` have been propagated outward: `estimate_truncation()` gained the full `dist_spec` delay families, `obs_opts()` observation model selection between Poisson and negative binomial, and the `likelihood` and `return_likelihood` settings that make prior-only fits and loo-compatible output possible. Hardcoded assumptions are being replaced by specifiable ones in the same motion — the truncation model's additive noise term was a fixed `sigma ~ normal(0, 1)` prior and is now a `dist_spec` argument.
◆ Prediction
Expect the remaining modelling functions to keep converging on the shared options interface, since the last two releases have each moved another function onto it. A new `estimate_dist()` for interval-censored linelist data suggests delay estimation is the area still gaining surface.
NWCTrends
0.0ANALYTICS
The salmon status-review trend package, maintained one federal review cycle at a time
◆ Current state
NWCTrends fits multivariate state-space trend models to Pacific salmon population data and generates the tables and figures used in NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center viability and status reviews. Its release history maps onto those review cycles rather than a development calendar: v1.0 carries the 2015 review code, v1.25 the 2020 review, v1.30 the changes since. The 2026 v1.31 is internal restructuring and a dependency swap.
◆ Where it's heading
Development is driven by reproducibility of a specific government reporting product, so most work goes into making the report generation configurable and the fitting assumptions explicit rather than into new modelling. The 2020 cycle removed hard-coded per-population hacks and made the fitting window an explicit argument; the 2023 cycle moved plot styling into package options and clarified how missing data and zeros are handled in the published tables.
◆ Prediction
The cadence suggests the next substantive release arrives with the next status review rather than before it, most likely continuing the move of report parameters out of function signatures and into structured configuration.
Alternatives to EpiNow2 and NWCTrends
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either EpiNow2 or NWCTrends.
epikit
epikit narrows to field-epidemiology helpers, handing proportions to a sibling package
SimInf
SimInf 10.0 turns an epidemic simulator into a tool that fits models to real time series
mutagen
A young package porting Stata's egen row-wise helpers to the tidyverse, one function per release
broman
A statistician's personal toolbox, growing one plotting utility at a time
qtl
R/qtl is in pure custodial mode: every recent release answers a compiler, not a user
See all EpiNow2 alternatives → · See all NWCTrends alternatives →
Recent activity from EpiNow2 and NWCTrends
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoEpiNow2estimate_truncation gains full delay and observation options
- 6mo agoEpiNow2Unified return objects and shared accessors across all models ⚡
- 7mo agoNWCTrendsReport params extracted to a list; gdata replaced with readxl
- 1y agoEpiNow2Patch for an upstream rstan issue
- 1y agoEpiNow2Accumulation for irregularly reported data; unified priors
- 1y agoEpiNow2Matern kernel spectral density fix and GP prior revert
- 1y agoEpiNow2Gaussian Process model improvements and explicit defaults
- 3y agoNWCTrendsPlot options move into package globals; figure data exported to CSV
- 5y agoNWCTrendsExplicit fitting window replaces implicit full-data fits
- 5y agoNWCTrendsInitial release packaging the 2015 status review code
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between EpiNow2 and NWCTrends?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. EpiNow2 and NWCTrends are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is EpiNow2 better than NWCTrends?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. EpiNow2 and NWCTrends are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to EpiNow2?
Top EpiNow2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "EpiNow2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/epinow2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to NWCTrends?
Top NWCTrends alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "NWCTrends alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nwctrends-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.