← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

cvms vs eratosthenes

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cvms and eratosthenes — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

cvms vs eratosthenes: at a glance

Featurecvmseratosthenes
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescross-validation, r-package, model-evaluation, visualizationarchaeology, bayesian-inference, mcmc, input-validation
Last editorial update1d ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cvms?

A cross-validation package whose real development has moved to its plotting function

cvms runs repeated cross-validation over model formulas and reports comparable metrics. The 2.0.0 release was a breaking correctness fix: every function accepting fold_cols mismatched training and testing data when fold indices were non-sequential, did not start at 1, or were strings, because the iteration index was compared against the raw fold value rather than its factor level index. 2.0.1 restored coefficient extraction for nnet::multinom and mixed models by supplying an environment containing the training data, and followed lme4's move of findbars() into the reformulas package.

Read the full cvms trajectory →

What is eratosthenes?

eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.

eratosthenes does Bayesian estimation of archaeological chronologies from relative sequences, absolute constraints and artifact assemblages. The 0.0.9 line built out the inference diagnostics — traceplots, histograms, batch-means MCSE reporting, displacement estimation — and then consolidated artifact probability-density estimation into a single gibbs_ad_type(). The 0.1.0 tag turns outward instead, adding validators for every user-supplied structure and replacing seq_check() with a more informative seq_diag().

Read the full eratosthenes trajectory →

cvms vs eratosthenes: editorial side-by-side

C
cvms
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A cross-validation package whose real development has moved to its plotting function

◆ Current state

cvms runs repeated cross-validation over model formulas and reports comparable metrics. The 2.0.0 release was a breaking correctness fix: every function accepting fold_cols mismatched training and testing data when fold indices were non-sequential, did not start at 1, or were strings, because the iteration index was compared against the raw fold value rather than its factor level index. 2.0.1 restored coefficient extraction for nnet::multinom and mixed models by supplying an environment containing the training data, and followed lme4's move of findbars() into the reformulas package.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel and only one is about cross-validation. The plotting function plot_confusion_matrix() has absorbed most feature work since 1.5.0 - custom gradient palettes, intensity limits, per-tile settings, dynamic font colors keyed to value thresholds, and arguments that accept functions rather than constants - to the point where a companion web application exists for using it without code. The cross-validation core, by contrast, sees maintenance: upstream compatibility fixes for pROC, ggnewscale and ggplot2, and the fold-matching correction that finally forced a major version.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued option growth in the confusion matrix plotting surface, since that is where nearly every release since 1.5.0 has spent its changes, with core cross-validation changes arriving only as upstream packages force them.

E
eratosthenes
INFRA · APIS
2.5

eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.

◆ Current state

eratosthenes does Bayesian estimation of archaeological chronologies from relative sequences, absolute constraints and artifact assemblages. The 0.0.9 line built out the inference diagnostics — traceplots, histograms, batch-means MCSE reporting, displacement estimation — and then consolidated artifact probability-density estimation into a single gibbs_ad_type(). The 0.1.0 tag turns outward instead, adding validators for every user-supplied structure and replacing seq_check() with a more informative seq_diag().

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from research code to something a non-author can run. Consolidating estimation behind one function, then wrapping every input class in a validator, are the two steps that make failures legible instead of cryptic, and the diagnostics added earlier serve the same end for the sampler itself. Nothing in the window changes the underlying model; the work is all about making it usable and its output checkable.

◆ Prediction

With inputs validated and diagnostics in place, the next release is more likely to extend the constraint or assemblage modelling than to keep reworking the interface, though the feed's three sparse tags give little to read a cadence from.

Alternatives to cvms and eratosthenes

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cvms or eratosthenes.

See all cvms alternatives → · See all eratosthenes alternatives →

Recent activity from cvms and eratosthenes

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 10d agoeratosthenesInput validators added; seq_check() replaced by seq_diag()
  2. 2mo agocvmsCoefficient extraction restored for multinom and mixed models
  3. 9mo agocvmsBreaking fix for mismatched folds with non-sequential fold IDs
  4. 11mo agocvmsTest compatibility with pROC 1.19 and a deprecation warning fix
  5. 1y agocvmsConfusion matrix fonts and colors can now be computed from the values
  6. 1y agoeratosthenesArtifact p.d.f. estimation consolidated into gibbs_ad_type()
  7. 1y agoeratosthenesMCMC diagnostics arrive: traceplots, histograms, batch-means MCSE
  8. 1y agocvmsTile intensity by row or column percentages
  9. 1y agocvmsMultinom coefficient extraction fix after a parameters update

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cvms and eratosthenes?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. eratosthenes is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cvms better than eratosthenes?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. eratosthenes is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cvms?

Top cvms alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cvms alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cvms for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to eratosthenes?

Top eratosthenes alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "eratosthenes alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/eratosthenes for the full list with editorial commentary on each.