← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

cvms vs FoReco

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cvms and FoReco — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

cvms vs FoReco: at a glance

FeaturecvmsFoReco
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescross-validation, r-package, model-evaluation, visualizationforecasting, hierarchical-reconciliation, time-series, s3-classes
Last editorial update1d ago53m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cvms?

A cross-validation package whose real development has moved to its plotting function

cvms runs repeated cross-validation over model formulas and reports comparable metrics. The 2.0.0 release was a breaking correctness fix: every function accepting fold_cols mismatched training and testing data when fold indices were non-sequential, did not start at 1, or were strings, because the iteration index was compared against the raw fold value rather than its factor level index. 2.0.1 restored coefficient extraction for nnet::multinom and mixed models by supplying an environment containing the training data, and followed lme4's move of findbars() into the reformulas package.

Read the full cvms trajectory →

What is FoReco?

Forecast reconciliation with a real object model, five years after it started returning bare matrices.

FoReco reconciles hierarchical forecasts across cross-sectional, temporal, and cross-temporal frameworks, and now covers both point and probabilistic reconciliation. The 1.3.0 release gave every reconciliation function a shared foreco S3 class carrying framework, function, forecast type, and reconciliation metadata, which replaced the loose attribute-and-helper pattern the package had used since 1.0.0. The follow-up 1.3.1 turned the same attention on the API's edges: strict argument validation with errors that name the expected and supplied values, and a help index pruned down to user-facing functions only.

Read the full FoReco trajectory →

cvms vs FoReco: editorial side-by-side

C
cvms
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A cross-validation package whose real development has moved to its plotting function

◆ Current state

cvms runs repeated cross-validation over model formulas and reports comparable metrics. The 2.0.0 release was a breaking correctness fix: every function accepting fold_cols mismatched training and testing data when fold indices were non-sequential, did not start at 1, or were strings, because the iteration index was compared against the raw fold value rather than its factor level index. 2.0.1 restored coefficient extraction for nnet::multinom and mixed models by supplying an environment containing the training data, and followed lme4's move of findbars() into the reformulas package.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel and only one is about cross-validation. The plotting function plot_confusion_matrix() has absorbed most feature work since 1.5.0 - custom gradient palettes, intensity limits, per-tile settings, dynamic font colors keyed to value thresholds, and arguments that accept functions rather than constants - to the point where a companion web application exists for using it without code. The cross-validation core, by contrast, sees maintenance: upstream compatibility fixes for pROC, ggnewscale and ggplot2, and the fold-matching correction that finally forced a major version.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued option growth in the confusion matrix plotting surface, since that is where nearly every release since 1.5.0 has spent its changes, with core cross-validation changes arriving only as upstream packages force them.

F
FoReco
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Forecast reconciliation with a real object model, five years after it started returning bare matrices.

◆ Current state

FoReco reconciles hierarchical forecasts across cross-sectional, temporal, and cross-temporal frameworks, and now covers both point and probabilistic reconciliation. The 1.3.0 release gave every reconciliation function a shared foreco S3 class carrying framework, function, forecast type, and reconciliation metadata, which replaced the loose attribute-and-helper pattern the package had used since 1.0.0. The follow-up 1.3.1 turned the same attention on the API's edges: strict argument validation with errors that name the expected and supplied values, and a help index pruned down to user-facing functions only.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is completing a reversal it started in 1.0.0. That release simplified outputs to plain matrices and pushed metadata into attributes reachable via recoinfo(); 1.3.0 removed recoinfo() outright and put the structure back as a class with components(), summary(), and plot() methods. The direction is toward being infrastructure rather than a function library — the class is exported through new_foreco_class() and a sibling package has already adopted it. Method coverage has meanwhile broadened from optimal combination into non-negative algorithms, bounded reconciliation, and Gaussian and sample-based probabilistic variants.

◆ Prediction

The soft-deprecated res2matrix() is flagged for removal, so a subsequent release should finish that cleanup; with the class now exported, expect more methods to hang off foreco objects rather than more top-level functions.

Alternatives to cvms and FoReco

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cvms or FoReco.

See all cvms alternatives → · See all FoReco alternatives →

Recent activity from cvms and FoReco

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoFoRecoStrict argument validation and a pruned help index
  2. 1mo agoFoRecoEvery reconciliation function now returns a shared foreco object
  3. 2mo agocvmsCoefficient extraction restored for multinom and mixed models
  4. 3mo agoFoRecoBootstrap functions gain xreg; simulate() argument bug fixed
  5. 5mo agoFoRecoGaussian and sample-based probabilistic reconciliation added
  6. 9mo agocvmsBreaking fix for mismatched folds with non-sequential fold IDs
  7. 11mo agocvmsTest compatibility with pROC 1.19 and a deprecation warning fix
  8. 1y agocvmsConfusion matrix fonts and colors can now be computed from the values
  9. 1y agoFoRecoBounded reconciliation and an oracle shrunk covariance estimator
  10. 1y agocvmsTile intensity by row or column percentages
  11. 1y agocvmsMultinom coefficient extraction fix after a parameters update
  12. 1y agoFoRecoBreaking rename: cs, te and ct prefixes across all functions

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cvms and FoReco?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. cvms and FoReco are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cvms better than FoReco?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cvms and FoReco are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cvms?

Top cvms alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cvms alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cvms for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to FoReco?

Top FoReco alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "FoReco alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/foreco for the full list with editorial commentary on each.