← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

cvms vs FoRecoML

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cvms and FoRecoML — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

cvms vs FoRecoML: at a glance

FeaturecvmsFoRecoML
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescross-validation, r-package, model-evaluation, visualizationforecasting, machine-learning, hierarchical-reconciliation, time-series
Last editorial update1d ago52m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cvms?

A cross-validation package whose real development has moved to its plotting function

cvms runs repeated cross-validation over model formulas and reports comparable metrics. The 2.0.0 release was a breaking correctness fix: every function accepting fold_cols mismatched training and testing data when fold indices were non-sequential, did not start at 1, or were strings, because the iteration index was compared against the raw fold value rather than its factor level index. 2.0.1 restored coefficient extraction for nnet::multinom and mixed models by supplying an environment containing the training data, and followed lme4's move of findbars() into the reformulas package.

Read the full cvms trajectory →

What is FoRecoML?

The machine-learning arm of a forecast reconciliation toolkit, four months old and already sharing its sibling's plumbing.

FoRecoML brings machine-learning approaches to forecast reconciliation across cross-sectional, temporal, and cross-temporal frameworks through csrml(), terml(), and ctrml(). It reached CRAN in April 2026 and has since spent both releases integrating with FoReco rather than expanding its own method set: results are now FoReco's foreco objects, and print() and summary() report framework, approach, problem dimensions, features, training sample size, combination matrix, and trained models.

Read the full FoRecoML trajectory →

cvms vs FoRecoML: editorial side-by-side

C
cvms
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A cross-validation package whose real development has moved to its plotting function

◆ Current state

cvms runs repeated cross-validation over model formulas and reports comparable metrics. The 2.0.0 release was a breaking correctness fix: every function accepting fold_cols mismatched training and testing data when fold indices were non-sequential, did not start at 1, or were strings, because the iteration index was compared against the raw fold value rather than its factor level index. 2.0.1 restored coefficient extraction for nnet::multinom and mixed models by supplying an environment containing the training data, and followed lme4's move of findbars() into the reformulas package.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel and only one is about cross-validation. The plotting function plot_confusion_matrix() has absorbed most feature work since 1.5.0 - custom gradient palettes, intensity limits, per-tile settings, dynamic font colors keyed to value thresholds, and arguments that accept functions rather than constants - to the point where a companion web application exists for using it without code. The cross-validation core, by contrast, sees maintenance: upstream compatibility fixes for pROC, ggnewscale and ggplot2, and the fold-matching correction that finally forced a major version.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued option growth in the confusion matrix plotting surface, since that is where nearly every release since 1.5.0 has spent its changes, with core cross-validation changes arriving only as upstream packages force them.

F
FoRecoML
INFRA · APIS
0.0

The machine-learning arm of a forecast reconciliation toolkit, four months old and already sharing its sibling's plumbing.

◆ Current state

FoRecoML brings machine-learning approaches to forecast reconciliation across cross-sectional, temporal, and cross-temporal frameworks through csrml(), terml(), and ctrml(). It reached CRAN in April 2026 and has since spent both releases integrating with FoReco rather than expanding its own method set: results are now FoReco's foreco objects, and print() and summary() report framework, approach, problem dimensions, features, training sample size, combination matrix, and trained models.

◆ Where it's heading

This package is being built as a satellite, not a competitor. Adopting FoReco's exported new_foreco_class() constructor within days of that class appearing means FoRecoML results drop straight into the same print, summary, plot, and components methods as analytically reconciled ones — which is what makes machine-learning and classical reconciliation directly comparable in a single workflow. The 1.1.1 argument-validation work landed in the same minute as the equivalent change in FoReco, so the two are being maintained as one release train.

◆ Prediction

With the integration work done, the next release is more likely to add or expose machine-learning approaches than to keep reshaping output; the structured summary already enumerates features and trained models, which suggests inspection tooling is where attention has been.

Alternatives to cvms and FoRecoML

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cvms or FoRecoML.

See all cvms alternatives → · See all FoRecoML alternatives →

Recent activity from cvms and FoRecoML

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoFoRecoMLStructured print and summary for fitted reconciliation models
  2. 1mo agoFoRecoMLAdopts FoReco's foreco class for all reconciliation output
  3. 2mo agocvmsCoefficient extraction restored for multinom and mixed models
  4. 3mo agoFoRecoMLMachine-learning forecast reconciliation arrives on CRAN
  5. 9mo agocvmsBreaking fix for mismatched folds with non-sequential fold IDs
  6. 11mo agocvmsTest compatibility with pROC 1.19 and a deprecation warning fix
  7. 1y agocvmsConfusion matrix fonts and colors can now be computed from the values
  8. 1y agocvmsTile intensity by row or column percentages
  9. 1y agocvmsMultinom coefficient extraction fix after a parameters update

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cvms and FoRecoML?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. cvms and FoRecoML are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cvms better than FoRecoML?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cvms and FoRecoML are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cvms?

Top cvms alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cvms alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cvms for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to FoRecoML?

Top FoRecoML alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "FoRecoML alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forecoml for the full list with editorial commentary on each.