← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

Currents vs Windmill

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Currents and Windmill — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Currents vs Windmill: at a glance

FeatureCurrentsWindmill
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.56.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themestest-observability, playwright, ci-testing, ide-integrationdeveloper-platform, ai-agents, evaluation, workflow-orchestration
Last editorial update2d ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Currents?

Currents moved into the IDE and repriced itself around self-serve in the same fortnight.

Currents publishes short labeled changelog entries, and the visible window runs from April to August. Two carry real weight: a VS Code and Cursor extension bringing CI runs, failure triage and Playwright traces into the editor, and a pricing restructure a week later adding a self-serve Business plan, cheaper rates, revised overage and yearly usage pooling. Around them sit integration work with Linear and Slack, and a @currents/playwright 2.0 release supporting Playwright 1.60 and newer.

Read the full Currents trajectory →

What is Windmill?

Windmill gives its AI agents a test harness, the piece that lets them into production flows

Windmill is a developer platform for scripts, flows and internal apps, shipping weekly across three lanes. The AI lane is the busiest: sessions that build scripts and flows as reviewable drafts, a read-only plan mode that refuses writes until you approve, version history on session artifacts, and now evaluation for reusable agents. The runtime lane keeps absorbing data tooling — dbt projects run natively, BigQuery and Snowflake came out from behind the Enterprise licence. The workspace lane is consolidating deployment semantics around fork lineage.

Read the full Windmill trajectory →

Currents vs Windmill: editorial side-by-side

C
Currents
INFRA · APIS
2.5

Currents moved into the IDE and repriced itself around self-serve in the same fortnight.

◆ Current state

Currents publishes short labeled changelog entries, and the visible window runs from April to August. Two carry real weight: a VS Code and Cursor extension bringing CI runs, failure triage and Playwright traces into the editor, and a pricing restructure a week later adding a self-serve Business plan, cheaper rates, revised overage and yearly usage pooling. Around them sit integration work with Linear and Slack, and a @currents/playwright 2.0 release supporting Playwright 1.60 and newer.

◆ Where it's heading

Currents is moving its surface toward where failures get fixed rather than where they get reported. The IDE extension, the Linear integration and the Slack notifications all describe the same handoff, and each one names agents alongside humans as the consumer. The pricing change points the same way commercially: a self-serve Business tier removes the sales conversation from the middle of the funnel, and that is precisely the tier an IDE extension is most likely to pull in.

◆ Prediction

Expect the agent-facing framing to become explicit, with the IDE extension and the API growing structured failure output a coding agent consumes directly rather than prose written for a human reader.

W
Windmill
INFRA · APIS
6.3

Windmill gives its AI agents a test harness, the piece that lets them into production flows

◆ Current state

Windmill is a developer platform for scripts, flows and internal apps, shipping weekly across three lanes. The AI lane is the busiest: sessions that build scripts and flows as reviewable drafts, a read-only plan mode that refuses writes until you approve, version history on session artifacts, and now evaluation for reusable agents. The runtime lane keeps absorbing data tooling — dbt projects run natively, BigQuery and Snowflake came out from behind the Enterprise licence. The workspace lane is consolidating deployment semantics around fork lineage.

◆ Where it's heading

The AI work has moved through a recognisable sequence: first let the assistant build things, then constrain what it may do without approval, then make its output reviewable and revertible, and now make agents measurable against a fixed set of cases. That is the arc of taking AI from a demo surface to something you are willing to put in a scheduled flow. In parallel, Windmill keeps pulling data-stack runtimes inside its own execution model rather than integrating with them, and keeps giving away runtimes that were previously licensed.

◆ Prediction

Evals are the obvious hook for regression gating, so expect them to be callable from a flow or CI rather than only from the agent card, and expect the eval run history to feed the same version-comparison surface the session artifacts already use.

Alternatives to Currents and Windmill

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Currents or Windmill.

See all Currents alternatives → · See all Windmill alternatives →

Recent activity from Currents and Windmill

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 9d agoWindmillAI agent evals (beta)
  2. 19d agoWindmillPlan mode for AI sessions
  3. 22d agoWindmillNested filter groups and dotted paths in trigger filters
  4. 23d agoWindmillVersion history for AI session artifacts
  5. 28d agoCurrents[Improved] Better Slack notifications for CI test runs
  6. 1mo agoWindmillRun dbt projects as a first-class Windmill runtime
  7. 1mo agoCurrents[Improved] New Pricing Plans
  8. 1mo agoWindmillOne deployment target, derived from the workspace lineage
  9. 1mo agoCurrents[New] Currents IDE Extension
  10. 1mo agoCurrents[New] Integration with Linear
  11. 3mo agoCurrents[New] @currents/playwright 2.0 - Playwright 1.60+ Support
  12. 4mo agoCurrents[New] Invite guests without using paid seats

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Currents and Windmill?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Windmill is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Currents better than Windmill?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Windmill is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Currents?

Top Currents alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Currents alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/currents-dev for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Windmill?

Top Windmill alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Windmill alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/windmill for the full list with editorial commentary on each.