← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

crul vs webchem

A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and webchem — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:ropensci

crul vs webchem: at a glance

Featurecrulwebchem
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeshttp-client, async, mocking, ropenscicheminformatics, web-apis, data-access, ropensci
Last editorial update1h ago4h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is crul?

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

Read the full crul trajectory →

What is webchem?

Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.

webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.

Read the full webchem trajectory →

crul vs webchem: editorial side-by-side

C
crul
ANALYTICS
0.0

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

◆ Current state

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

◆ Where it's heading

The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.

◆ Prediction

With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.

W
webchem
ANALYTICS
0.0

Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.

◆ Current state

webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.

◆ Where it's heading

Two opposing forces run through these entries. The package keeps widening its coverage — ChEMBL in 1.2.0, LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers via Wikidata, structure images, Mol export — while the open, unauthenticated end of the chemical web keeps contracting. The other consistent thread is interface harmonisation: successive releases have converged the get_* functions on the same query and from arguments, tibble returns, and CAS reformatting, so the package feels like one interface rather than a dozen wrappers.

◆ Prediction

Expect further defunct functions and URL repairs as more providers move behind keys or shut down, alongside occasional additions of sources that remain open. The entries show no sign of a general credential-management layer, which is what a package facing this trend would eventually need.

Alternatives to crul and webchem

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or webchem.

See all crul alternatives → · See all webchem alternatives →

Recent activity from crul and webchem

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr
  2. 1y agowebchemRepairs broken URLs; ChemSpider check now needs a key
  3. 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
  4. 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
  5. 3y agowebchemChemIDplus and PAN queries removed as sources shut down
  6. 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
  7. 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
  8. 3y agowebchemAdds ChEMBL access for bioactive compound data
  9. 4y agowebchemcir_query() returns a tibble, a breaking change
  10. 4y agowebchemAdds Mol structure export; aw_query renamed to bcpc_query
  11. 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary
  12. 5y agowebchemFetches LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers from Wikidata

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between crul and webchem?

Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. crul and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is crul better than webchem?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crul and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to crul?

Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to webchem?

Top webchem alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webchem alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webchem for the full list with editorial commentary on each.