tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
gigs vs webchem
A side-by-side editorial comparison of gigs and webchem — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
gigs vs webchem: at a glance
What is gigs?
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
gigs implements international newborn and infant growth standards — INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO — converting anthropometric measurements to z-scores and centiles and classifying growth outcomes. The 0.5.0 release rewrote the public API around rOpenSci review feedback; the two releases after it change no code at all, existing purely to get the documentation site building.
What is webchem?
Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.
webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.
gigs vs webchem: editorial side-by-side
gigs
0.0ANALYTICS
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
◆ Current state
gigs implements international newborn and infant growth standards — INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO — converting anthropometric measurements to z-scores and centiles and classifying growth outcomes. The 0.5.0 release rewrote the public API around rOpenSci review feedback; the two releases after it change no code at all, existing purely to get the documentation site building.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has moved from vector-in, vector-out conversion helpers to a data.frame-oriented interface with a single classify_growth() entry point that computes whatever outcomes the supplied columns allow. That is a shift from library to tool — the user describes their data rather than picking the right function. The trailing releases suggest the code is settled and the remaining work is packaging and discoverability.
◆ Prediction
With the API rewrite absorbed and hosting moved to rOpenSci, the next substantive release should add growth standards or outcomes rather than reshape the interface again.
webchem
0.0ANALYTICS
Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.
◆ Current state
webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.
◆ Where it's heading
Two opposing forces run through these entries. The package keeps widening its coverage — ChEMBL in 1.2.0, LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers via Wikidata, structure images, Mol export — while the open, unauthenticated end of the chemical web keeps contracting. The other consistent thread is interface harmonisation: successive releases have converged the get_* functions on the same query and from arguments, tibble returns, and CAS reformatting, so the package feels like one interface rather than a dozen wrappers.
◆ Prediction
Expect further defunct functions and URL repairs as more providers move behind keys or shut down, alongside occasional additions of sources that remain open. The entries show no sign of a general credential-management layer, which is what a package facing this trend would eventually need.
Alternatives to gigs and webchem
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gigs or webchem.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
datasetjson
datasetjson rebuilt its object model to track the CDISC Dataset-JSON 1.1 schema.
See all gigs alternatives → · See all webchem alternatives →
Recent activity from gigs and webchem
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1y agowebchemRepairs broken URLs; ChemSpider check now needs a key
- 1y agogigsDocs and Zenodo archiving
- 1y agogigsDocs-only release; nothing changed internally
- 1y agogigsConversion API rewritten around data frames and classify_growth() ⚡
- 2y agogigsDocumentation fixes for autotest compliance
- 2y agogigsINTERGROWTH-21st fetal standards and input validation
- 2y agogigsPatch release with documentation update
- 3y agowebchemChemIDplus and PAN queries removed as sources shut down ⚡
- 3y agowebchemAdds ChEMBL access for bioactive compound data
- 4y agowebchemcir_query() returns a tibble, a breaking change
- 4y agowebchemAdds Mol structure export; aw_query renamed to bcpc_query
- 5y agowebchemFetches LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers from Wikidata
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between gigs and webchem?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. gigs and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is gigs better than webchem?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gigs and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to gigs?
Top gigs alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gigs alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gigs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webchem?
Top webchem alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webchem alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webchem for the full list with editorial commentary on each.