Fulcrum
Fulcrum is consolidating on Esri, with Google Maps gone September 1
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Count and Omni — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Count is turning its BI canvas into a governed, agent-operated analytics platform.
Count is a data-canvas analytics tool reorganizing itself around an AI agent. In two months it shipped a full public REST API and hosted MCP server (governed agent access via OAuth and service accounts), a major agent upgrade that lets the agent read and edit the entire canvas and answer from Slack, and the ability to plug external MCP servers (Linear, HubSpot, Stripe, Slack, Drive) into the agent. Around the agent it keeps broadening warehouse support—ClickHouse, Snowflake semantic models, OSI—alongside chart and UX polish.
Omni ships weekly, and almost every week the headline item is an AI feature
Omni publishes a dated weekly digest whose body is a single line listing that week's items, so each entry compresses several releases into a sentence. Across seven consecutive weeks the pattern is unmistakable: AI-powered semantic model generation reaching general availability, AI Routines creatable from chat and deliverable to Slack, AI model suggestion endpoints, AI credit controls scoped to embed entity groups and individual users, AI Evals support on Azure, and MCP surfaces appearing both in-app and as a searchDashboards tool. The non-AI items are steady BI plumbing — OAuth and GitHub App authentication for dbt connections, mobile dashboard settings, map legend positioning, presentation mode.
Count is a data-canvas analytics tool reorganizing itself around an AI agent. In two months it shipped a full public REST API and hosted MCP server (governed agent access via OAuth and service accounts), a major agent upgrade that lets the agent read and edit the entire canvas and answer from Slack, and the ability to plug external MCP servers (Linear, HubSpot, Stripe, Slack, Drive) into the agent. Around the agent it keeps broadening warehouse support—ClickHouse, Snowflake semantic models, OSI—alongside chart and UX polish.
Count is building toward analytics where agents are first-class operators: a governed API/MCP layer for access, an agent that drives the canvas end to end, external tool reach via MCP, and connection-level context so guidance is captured once and inherited. Governance—permissions, scopes, service accounts—is the enabling layer that makes agent access acceptable in real data stacks rather than a bolt-on.
Expect more connection- and warehouse-level context controls, a widening catalog of supported external MCP integrations, and deeper Slack-native agent workflows.
Omni publishes a dated weekly digest whose body is a single line listing that week's items, so each entry compresses several releases into a sentence. Across seven consecutive weeks the pattern is unmistakable: AI-powered semantic model generation reaching general availability, AI Routines creatable from chat and deliverable to Slack, AI model suggestion endpoints, AI credit controls scoped to embed entity groups and individual users, AI Evals support on Azure, and MCP surfaces appearing both in-app and as a searchDashboards tool. The non-AI items are steady BI plumbing — OAuth and GitHub App authentication for dbt connections, mobile dashboard settings, map legend positioning, presentation mode.
Two things are happening in parallel and they are related. Omni is pushing AI into the modelling layer rather than only the query layer, which is what semantic model generation reaching GA signifies — the artifact that normally takes an analytics engineer weeks is being generated. At the same time it is building the commercial and access controls that AI features require: credit limits per user and per embed entity group arrived within weeks of the AI capabilities that consume them. The MCP work points at a third direction, exposing Omni's content to external agents rather than only serving its own chat.
Credit controls appearing so soon after the AI features suggests consumption limits will keep expanding to cover newer surfaces, and with searchDashboards shipped as an MCP tool, more of Omni's catalog is the obvious next thing to expose that way.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Count or Omni.
Fulcrum is consolidating on Esri, with Google Maps gone September 1
Four ODD Platform releases in two weeks, and not one of them changes the product
Baremaps got geoparquet and hillshading, then went quiet for eighteen months in incubation
Deequ ships GitHub tags whose release notes are one commit message long
Marquez spent 2024 turning a lineage store into a UI, then stopped releasing
Amundsen's last release was a config flag, and the feed has been silent for two years
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — mcp — within Analytics. Count and Omni are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Count and Omni are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top Count alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Count alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/count for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Omni alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Omni alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/omni for the full list with editorial commentary on each.