← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Count vs Omni

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Count and Omni — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:mcp

Count vs Omni: at a glance

FeatureCountOmni
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score6.36.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesagentic-analytics, mcp, public-api, warehouse-connectorsbusiness-intelligence, semantic-model, ai-routines, mcp
Last editorial update1mo ago14h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Count?

Count is turning its BI canvas into a governed, agent-operated analytics platform.

Count is a data-canvas analytics tool reorganizing itself around an AI agent. In two months it shipped a full public REST API and hosted MCP server (governed agent access via OAuth and service accounts), a major agent upgrade that lets the agent read and edit the entire canvas and answer from Slack, and the ability to plug external MCP servers (Linear, HubSpot, Stripe, Slack, Drive) into the agent. Around the agent it keeps broadening warehouse support—ClickHouse, Snowflake semantic models, OSI—alongside chart and UX polish.

Read the full Count trajectory →

What is Omni?

Omni ships weekly, and almost every week the headline item is an AI feature

Omni publishes a dated weekly digest whose body is a single line listing that week's items, so each entry compresses several releases into a sentence. Across seven consecutive weeks the pattern is unmistakable: AI-powered semantic model generation reaching general availability, AI Routines creatable from chat and deliverable to Slack, AI model suggestion endpoints, AI credit controls scoped to embed entity groups and individual users, AI Evals support on Azure, and MCP surfaces appearing both in-app and as a searchDashboards tool. The non-AI items are steady BI plumbing — OAuth and GitHub App authentication for dbt connections, mobile dashboard settings, map legend positioning, presentation mode.

Read the full Omni trajectory →

Count vs Omni: editorial side-by-side

C
Count
ANALYTICS
6.3

Count is turning its BI canvas into a governed, agent-operated analytics platform.

◆ Current state

Count is a data-canvas analytics tool reorganizing itself around an AI agent. In two months it shipped a full public REST API and hosted MCP server (governed agent access via OAuth and service accounts), a major agent upgrade that lets the agent read and edit the entire canvas and answer from Slack, and the ability to plug external MCP servers (Linear, HubSpot, Stripe, Slack, Drive) into the agent. Around the agent it keeps broadening warehouse support—ClickHouse, Snowflake semantic models, OSI—alongside chart and UX polish.

◆ Where it's heading

Count is building toward analytics where agents are first-class operators: a governed API/MCP layer for access, an agent that drives the canvas end to end, external tool reach via MCP, and connection-level context so guidance is captured once and inherited. Governance—permissions, scopes, service accounts—is the enabling layer that makes agent access acceptable in real data stacks rather than a bolt-on.

◆ Prediction

Expect more connection- and warehouse-level context controls, a widening catalog of supported external MCP integrations, and deeper Slack-native agent workflows.

O
Omni
ANALYTICS
6.3

Omni ships weekly, and almost every week the headline item is an AI feature

◆ Current state

Omni publishes a dated weekly digest whose body is a single line listing that week's items, so each entry compresses several releases into a sentence. Across seven consecutive weeks the pattern is unmistakable: AI-powered semantic model generation reaching general availability, AI Routines creatable from chat and deliverable to Slack, AI model suggestion endpoints, AI credit controls scoped to embed entity groups and individual users, AI Evals support on Azure, and MCP surfaces appearing both in-app and as a searchDashboards tool. The non-AI items are steady BI plumbing — OAuth and GitHub App authentication for dbt connections, mobile dashboard settings, map legend positioning, presentation mode.

◆ Where it's heading

Two things are happening in parallel and they are related. Omni is pushing AI into the modelling layer rather than only the query layer, which is what semantic model generation reaching GA signifies — the artifact that normally takes an analytics engineer weeks is being generated. At the same time it is building the commercial and access controls that AI features require: credit limits per user and per embed entity group arrived within weeks of the AI capabilities that consume them. The MCP work points at a third direction, exposing Omni's content to external agents rather than only serving its own chat.

◆ Prediction

Credit controls appearing so soon after the AI features suggests consumption limits will keep expanding to cover newer surfaces, and with searchDashboards shipped as an MCP tool, more of Omni's catalog is the obvious next thing to expose that way.

Alternatives to Count and Omni

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Count or Omni.

See all Count alternatives → · See all Omni alternatives →

Recent activity from Count and Omni

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoOmniOmni adds presentation mode and a searchDashboards MCP tool
  2. 8d agoOmniOmni adds AI credit controls per user and embed entity group
  3. 15d agoOmniAI semantic model generation goes generally available in Omni
  4. 22d agoOmniOmni adds AI suggestion endpoints and OAuth for database connections
  5. 29d agoOmniOmni brings AI routines to Slack and adds in-app MCP settings
  6. 1mo agoOmniOmni adds AccessBoost for Apps and dbt deploy-token auth
  7. 2mo agoCountConnect external MCP servers to the Count agent
  8. 2mo agoCountDashed lines
  9. 2mo agoCountNew workspace home
  10. 3mo agoCountClickHouse support
  11. 3mo agoCountMajor Count agent upgrade: edits any cell, runs in Slack
  12. 4mo agoCountPublic API and MCP server

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Count and Omni?

Both compete on the same themes — mcp — within Analytics. Count and Omni are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Count better than Omni?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Count and Omni are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Count?

Top Count alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Count alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/count for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Omni?

Top Omni alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Omni alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/omni for the full list with editorial commentary on each.