← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

collapse vs protr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of collapse and protr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

collapse vs protr: at a glance

Featurecollapseprotr
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdata-transformation, performance, simd, grouped-statisticsproteomics, sequence-descriptors, bioconductor, feature-parity
Last editorial update5h ago42m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is collapse?

collapse got a JSS paper and a 7x fmean speedup in the same release.

collapse provides fast grouped statistical computing and data transformation for R, built on a C backend with its own grouping, hashing and aggregation primitives. The 2.1.x line is a maintenance and optimization series: SIMD multiple-accumulator work delivering roughly 2x on fsum() and 7x on fmean() for systems without OpenMP, a custom internal unlist() with better attribute preservation, and a steady stream of correctness fixes in collap(), pivot() and roworderv().

Read the full collapse trajectory →

What is protr?

protr's feature set is finished; the work now is surviving Bioconductor's churn.

protr generates numerical descriptors from protein sequences for machine learning, plus alignment-based similarity between sequences. The descriptor functions have been stable for years. Recent releases divide cleanly into two kinds: extending the similarity computations to work under memory constraints, and absorbing the Bioconductor split that moved pairwise alignment out of Biostrings into pwalign.

Read the full protr trajectory →

collapse vs protr: editorial side-by-side

C
collapse
ANALYTICS
0.0

collapse got a JSS paper and a 7x fmean speedup in the same release.

◆ Current state

collapse provides fast grouped statistical computing and data transformation for R, built on a C backend with its own grouping, hashing and aggregation primitives. The 2.1.x line is a maintenance and optimization series: SIMD multiple-accumulator work delivering roughly 2x on fsum() and 7x on fmean() for systems without OpenMP, a custom internal unlist() with better attribute preservation, and a steady stream of correctness fixes in collap(), pivot() and roworderv().

◆ Where it's heading

The package is consolidating institutionally as much as technically. The repository moved to the fastverse organization with multiple people granted access, the Journal of Statistical Software paper landed as the primary citation, and documentation now includes an AI-generated interactive layer. Technically the focus is the hashing and grouping core — the decision to treat -0 and 0 as equal across funique(), group(), fmatch(), fmode() and their derivatives was made in sync with an equivalent change in Rcpp, and accepted a measured 3% cost to get it. The last release with breaking changes sits outside this six-entry window.

◆ Prediction

Expect further targeted performance work on the grouped statistical functions and continued small correctness fixes; the governance move to fastverse suggests contribution volume rather than direction is what the maintainer is managing.

P
protr
ANALYTICS
0.0

protr's feature set is finished; the work now is surviving Bioconductor's churn.

◆ Current state

protr generates numerical descriptors from protein sequences for machine learning, plus alignment-based similarity between sequences. The descriptor functions have been stable for years. Recent releases divide cleanly into two kinds: extending the similarity computations to work under memory constraints, and absorbing the Bioconductor split that moved pairwise alignment out of Biostrings into pwalign.

◆ Where it's heading

The similarity side is where the remaining engineering goes, and it follows a consistent pattern — whatever parSeqSim() gained, crossSetSim() eventually gets. Batching, verbose progress and a disk-backed variant all arrived for the single-set case first and were mirrored for the cross-set case in 1.7-1. That is a maintainer closing feature-parity gaps rather than opening new directions, and the two most recent releases contain no user-facing change at all.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to react to another Bioconductor or R CMD check change, which accounts for three of the last four. The similarity functions now have parity, so there is no obvious internal backlog left.

Alternatives to collapse and protr

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either collapse or protr.

See all collapse alternatives → · See all protr alternatives →

Recent activity from collapse and protr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agocollapseSIMD accumulators give fmean a 7x speedup without OpenMP
  2. 7mo agocollapseNegative zero now hashes equal to zero across the package
  3. 8mo agocollapsecollap() no longer double-aggregates external weights
  4. 9mo agocollapseCustom unlist() preserves attributes
  5. 11mo agoprotrprotr 1.7-5 silences a Debian r-devel check note
  6. 0y agocollapseAssorted bug fixes
  7. 1y agocollapsena_insert gains by-reference mode; gsplit and pivot speed up
  8. 1y agoprotrprotr 1.7-4 checks alignment dependencies upfront
  9. 1y agoprotrprotr 1.7-3 detects Biostrings version to find pwalign
  10. 2y agoprotrprotr 1.7-2 fixes citation key and vignette accessibility
  11. 2y agoprotrprotr 1.7-1 brings crossSetSim to parity with parSeqSim
  12. 2y agoprotrprotr 1.7-0 adds crossSetSim for two-set similarity

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between collapse and protr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. collapse and protr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is collapse better than protr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. collapse and protr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to collapse?

Top collapse alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "collapse alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/collapse-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to protr?

Top protr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "protr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/protr-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.