← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

bpbounds vs spatstat.geom

A side-by-side editorial comparison of bpbounds and spatstat.geom — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

bpbounds vs spatstat.geom: at a glance

Featurebpboundsspatstat.geom
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescausal inference, instrumental variables, r, partial identificationspatial-statistics, computational-geometry, r-package, three-dimensional
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is bpbounds?

bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range

bpbounds computes nonparametric Balke-Pearl bounds on the average causal effect from instrumental variable data, in the bivariate and trivariate cases. After years of pure packaging maintenance, the two 2026 releases are analytical corrections. Bounds on intervention probabilities are now clamped to [0, 1] so derived causal risk ratio bounds cannot fall outside their feasible range, and a cell-ordering error in the trivariate three-category instrument path has been repaired.

Read the full bpbounds trajectory →

What is spatstat.geom?

The geometry layer under spatstat, steadily absorbing 3D patterns and missing-data semantics

spatstat.geom holds the spatial data structures and geometric operations the rest of the spatstat family builds on — windows, tessellations, images, point patterns and the operations that move between them. Recent releases split their attention between extending those structures to three dimensions and hardening the discretisation code where polygonal geometry meets a pixel grid. 3.8-2 adds more capabilities for three-dimensional point patterns.

Read the full spatstat.geom trajectory →

bpbounds vs spatstat.geom: editorial side-by-side

B
bpbounds
ANALYTICS
0.0

bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range

◆ Current state

bpbounds computes nonparametric Balke-Pearl bounds on the average causal effect from instrumental variable data, in the bivariate and trivariate cases. After years of pure packaging maintenance, the two 2026 releases are analytical corrections. Bounds on intervention probabilities are now clamped to [0, 1] so derived causal risk ratio bounds cannot fall outside their feasible range, and a cell-ordering error in the trivariate three-category instrument path has been repaired.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is toward agreement with the reference Stata implementation and away from silently wrong output. The clamping change is described as matching the same fix in the Stata package, which suggests the two implementations are being reconciled rather than developed independently. The cell-ordering defect is the more instructive one: it was fixed in the calculation function in 0.1.7 and then again in the constraint matrix in 0.1.8, meaning the same x=0,y=1 / x=1,y=0 swap had been written in two places.

◆ Prediction

Since the recent fixes came from an external contributor's report and both touched the trivariate three-category path, the untested corners of that path are where further corrections would surface — but the release notes give no roadmap beyond parity with the Stata package.

S
spatstat.geom
ANALYTICS
2.5

The geometry layer under spatstat, steadily absorbing 3D patterns and missing-data semantics

◆ Current state

spatstat.geom holds the spatial data structures and geometric operations the rest of the spatstat family builds on — windows, tessellations, images, point patterns and the operations that move between them. Recent releases split their attention between extending those structures to three dimensions and hardening the discretisation code where polygonal geometry meets a pixel grid. 3.8-2 adds more capabilities for three-dimensional point patterns.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through this window. The first is a family-wide push into 3D that originated in the simulation package and has now reached the geometry layer. The second is a slower semantic change: 3.5-0 introduced missing or unavailable (NA) spatial objects, and 3.6-0 followed with more facilities for handling them, meaning an absent window or image became a representable value rather than an error. Around both, the plotting and discretisation code accretes steadily — nonlinear colour maps, plot backgrounds, transparency control, signed distance transforms, and repeated attention to boundary pixels.

◆ Prediction

Expect the 3D surface here to keep filling in behind the simulation package rather than leading it, given that 3.8-2 follows the 3D simulation release by two months. The entries give no indication that the NA work is finished, since it has already spanned two releases.

Alternatives to bpbounds and spatstat.geom

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bpbounds or spatstat.geom.

See all bpbounds alternatives → · See all spatstat.geom alternatives →

Recent activity from bpbounds and spatstat.geom

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 20d agospatstat.geomMore three-dimensional point pattern capabilities
  2. 1mo agobpboundsbpbounds clamps probability bounds and fixes a constraint-matrix swap
  3. 2mo agospatstat.geomBetter boundary pixel handling when discretising windows
  4. 2mo agobpboundsbpbounds fixes swapped cells in the trivariate calculation
  5. 6mo agospatstat.geomAnalytic level sets and signed distance transforms
  6. 10mo agospatstat.geomNA object handling extended; clickpoly gains grid snapping
  7. 1y agospatstat.geomNA spatial objects, hole removal and connected components
  8. 1y agospatstat.geomNonlinear colour and symbol maps; half-open quadrat tiles
  9. 2y agobpboundsbpbounds 0.1.6
  10. 3y agobpboundsbpbounds 0.1.5
  11. 6y agobpboundsVersion 0.1.4 on CRAN
  12. 7y agobpboundsVersion 0.1.3

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between bpbounds and spatstat.geom?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. spatstat.geom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is bpbounds better than spatstat.geom?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spatstat.geom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to bpbounds?

Top bpbounds alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bpbounds alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bpbounds for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spatstat.geom?

Top spatstat.geom alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatstat.geom alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatstat-geom for the full list with editorial commentary on each.