← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

OHPL vs spatstat.geom

A side-by-side editorial comparison of OHPL and spatstat.geom — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

OHPL vs spatstat.geom: at a glance

FeatureOHPLspatstat.geom
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeschemometrics, variable-selection, spectroscopy, archival-maintenancespatial-statistics, computational-geometry, r-package, three-dimensional
Last editorial update50m ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is OHPL?

A 2017 chemometrics method frozen in place, visited only when CRAN changes its documentation rules.

OHPL implements ordered homogeneity pursuit lasso, a variable selection method for high-dimensional spectroscopic data that groups correlated predictors before applying a lasso. The functional package was complete by 1.2 in 2017, when prediction, performance evaluation and simulated data generation functions were added. Every release since has touched documentation and packaging only.

Read the full OHPL trajectory →

What is spatstat.geom?

The geometry layer under spatstat, steadily absorbing 3D patterns and missing-data semantics

spatstat.geom holds the spatial data structures and geometric operations the rest of the spatstat family builds on — windows, tessellations, images, point patterns and the operations that move between them. Recent releases split their attention between extending those structures to three dimensions and hardening the discretisation code where polygonal geometry meets a pixel grid. 3.8-2 adds more capabilities for three-dimensional point patterns.

Read the full spatstat.geom trajectory →

OHPL vs spatstat.geom: editorial side-by-side

O
OHPL
ANALYTICS
0.0

A 2017 chemometrics method frozen in place, visited only when CRAN changes its documentation rules.

◆ Current state

OHPL implements ordered homogeneity pursuit lasso, a variable selection method for high-dimensional spectroscopic data that groups correlated predictors before applying a lasso. The functional package was complete by 1.2 in 2017, when prediction, performance evaluation and simulated data generation functions were added. Every release since has touched documentation and packaging only.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a published-method package in the archival phase: the algorithm is fixed, the paper is cited, and the maintainer keeps it installable. The releases read as a timeline of R packaging conventions rather than of the method — tidyverse code style in 2019, roxygen2 Markdown and bibentry() in 2024, Rd HTML validation in 2026. Gaps of two to five years between releases are normal here.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release whenever CRAN introduces another documentation or packaging check; there is no indication the method itself will be extended.

S
spatstat.geom
ANALYTICS
2.5

The geometry layer under spatstat, steadily absorbing 3D patterns and missing-data semantics

◆ Current state

spatstat.geom holds the spatial data structures and geometric operations the rest of the spatstat family builds on — windows, tessellations, images, point patterns and the operations that move between them. Recent releases split their attention between extending those structures to three dimensions and hardening the discretisation code where polygonal geometry meets a pixel grid. 3.8-2 adds more capabilities for three-dimensional point patterns.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through this window. The first is a family-wide push into 3D that originated in the simulation package and has now reached the geometry layer. The second is a slower semantic change: 3.5-0 introduced missing or unavailable (NA) spatial objects, and 3.6-0 followed with more facilities for handling them, meaning an absent window or image became a representable value rather than an error. Around both, the plotting and discretisation code accretes steadily — nonlinear colour maps, plot backgrounds, transparency control, signed distance transforms, and repeated attention to boundary pixels.

◆ Prediction

Expect the 3D surface here to keep filling in behind the simulation package rather than leading it, given that 3.8-2 follows the 3D simulation release by two months. The entries give no indication that the NA work is finished, since it has already spanned two releases.

Alternatives to OHPL and spatstat.geom

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either OHPL or spatstat.geom.

See all OHPL alternatives → · See all spatstat.geom alternatives →

Recent activity from OHPL and spatstat.geom

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 20d agospatstat.geomMore three-dimensional point pattern capabilities
  2. 2mo agospatstat.geomBetter boundary pixel handling when discretising windows
  3. 4mo agoOHPLRd documentation HTML validation fixed
  4. 6mo agospatstat.geomAnalytic level sets and signed distance transforms
  5. 10mo agospatstat.geomNA object handling extended; clickpoly gains grid snapping
  6. 1y agospatstat.geomNA spatial objects, hole removal and connected components
  7. 1y agospatstat.geomNonlinear colour and symbol maps; half-open quadrat tiles
  8. 2y agoOHPLDocumentation modernized to current R conventions
  9. 7y agoOHPLCode restyled and repository links updated
  10. 9y agoOHPLCitation information and documentation site updated
  11. 9y agoOHPLPrediction and evaluation functions complete the package

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between OHPL and spatstat.geom?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. spatstat.geom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is OHPL better than spatstat.geom?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spatstat.geom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to OHPL?

Top OHPL alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OHPL alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ohpl for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spatstat.geom?

Top spatstat.geom alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatstat.geom alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatstat-geom for the full list with editorial commentary on each.