← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

bagyo vs intsurv

A side-by-side editorial comparison of bagyo and intsurv — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

bagyo vs intsurv: at a glance

Featurebagyointsurv
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesopen data, tropical cyclones, philippines, data packagesurvival-analysis, cure-models, censored-data, regularization
Last editorial update1h ago44m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is bagyo?

bagyo reached CRAN as a Philippine tropical cyclone dataset, with its tags stamped out of order.

A data package distributing Philippine Area of Responsibility tropical cyclone records, developed through 2024 pre-releases and accepted by CRAN in early 2026. The substantive release is v0.2.0: 2021 and 2022 typhoon data added, an unexported helper for downloading cyclone reports, CITATION.cff, an R 4.1 dependency for the base pipe, and a full pass over vignettes, tests and README. The v0.1.1 tag announcing the first CRAN release carries no content and is stamped two hours after v0.2.0.

Read the full bagyo trajectory →

What is intsurv?

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

Read the full intsurv trajectory →

bagyo vs intsurv: editorial side-by-side

B
bagyo
ANALYTICS
0.0

bagyo reached CRAN as a Philippine tropical cyclone dataset, with its tags stamped out of order.

◆ Current state

A data package distributing Philippine Area of Responsibility tropical cyclone records, developed through 2024 pre-releases and accepted by CRAN in early 2026. The substantive release is v0.2.0: 2021 and 2022 typhoon data added, an unexported helper for downloading cyclone reports, CITATION.cff, an R 4.1 dependency for the base pipe, and a full pass over vignettes, tests and README. The v0.1.1 tag announcing the first CRAN release carries no content and is stamped two hours after v0.2.0.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is establishing itself as a citable, yearly-updated dataset rather than a one-off scrape — the download helper and the '2022 data and general yearly upkeep' commit both point at a recurring refresh, and the CRAN DOI and CITATION file exist so the data can be cited in papers. It sits alongside the same maintainer's other public-health and survey data packages, which received matching repository upkeep in the same month.

◆ Prediction

Expect an annual data release adding the next typhoon season, since that is the only recurring change in the history and the download helper was written to support it.

I
intsurv
ANALYTICS
0.0

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

◆ Current state

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has reached the point where the methods are settled and the remaining work is ergonomics. Moving control parameters, M-step settings and penalty specification into cox_cure.control(), cox_cure.mstep() and cox_cure_net.penalty() follows the established R convention of separating tuning from the model formula, and it arrives long after the arguments accumulated. The C++ headers were placed in inst/include as early as 2019 so other packages could link against them, which suggests the implementation was always intended to be reused.

◆ Prediction

The gap between 0.2.2 and 0.3.0 makes cadence a poor basis for prediction. What the entries do support is that the interface rework is unfinished business rather than a prelude to new methods, so consolidation around the new helper functions is the likelier next step.

Alternatives to bagyo and intsurv

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bagyo or intsurv.

See all bagyo alternatives → · See all intsurv alternatives →

Recent activity from bagyo and intsurv

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 7mo agobagyobagyo v0.1.1
  2. 7mo agobagyo2021 and 2022 typhoon data added
  3. 10mo agointsurvModel configuration moves into dedicated control functions
  4. 2y agobagyoPre-release for Zenodo archiving
  5. 2y agobagyoInitial pre-release
  6. 5y agointsurvCross-validated model selection and offset terms added
  7. 6y agointsurvC++ headers relocated so other packages can link them
  8. 7y agointsurvCox cure models for uncertain event status arrive
  9. 7y agointsurvParameter initialization methods added to the alpha
  10. 7y agointsurvAlpha cut for paper submission and simulation reproducibility

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between bagyo and intsurv?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. bagyo and intsurv are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is bagyo better than intsurv?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. bagyo and intsurv are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to bagyo?

Top bagyo alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bagyo alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bagyo for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to intsurv?

Top intsurv alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "intsurv alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/intsurv for the full list with editorial commentary on each.