soilDBdata
soilDBdata exists so soilDB's tests can run without a NASIS connection.
Comparison · Analytics
b3gbi vs invasimapr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of b3gbi and invasimapr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:biodiversityr package
b3gbi vs invasimapr: at a glance
What is b3gbi?
b3gbi pulled confidence intervals out of its indicator workflow and handed them to dubicube.
b3gbi computes biodiversity indicators from GBIF occurrence cubes for the B-Cubed project, and sits at 0.9.4 in a JOSS review run-up. The 0.9 release decoupled uncertainty from indicator calculation: confidence intervals are no longer produced inline but added afterward with add_ci(), backed by whole-cube bootstrapping from the sibling dubicube package. Everything since has been grid-parsing and compatibility repair around that split.
What is invasimapr?
invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.
invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.
b3gbi vs invasimapr: editorial side-by-side
b3gbi
2.5ANALYTICS
b3gbi pulled confidence intervals out of its indicator workflow and handed them to dubicube.
◆ Current state
b3gbi computes biodiversity indicators from GBIF occurrence cubes for the B-Cubed project, and sits at 0.9.4 in a JOSS review run-up. The 0.9 release decoupled uncertainty from indicator calculation: confidence intervals are no longer produced inline but added afterward with add_ci(), backed by whole-cube bootstrapping from the sibling dubicube package. Everything since has been grid-parsing and compatibility repair around that split.
◆ Where it's heading
Two forces are shaping releases. Internally, the uncertainty split produced an indicator-specific rule book — species-level indicators bootstrap the whole cube, raw counts resample within year, evenness gets a logit transform — and that rule book is where the statistical thinking now lives. Externally, GBIF's taxonomic backbone migration to the Catalogue of Life forced string taxon keys through process_cube() and the plotting paths, while recurring EEA and MGRS grid-code fixes mark coordinate parsing as the least settled area.
◆ Prediction
The 0.9.4 notes are entirely JOSS review items — contributors, examples, tracked datasets — so the next release is most likely a JOSS-accepted 1.0 rather than new indicator work.
invasimapr
0.0ANALYTICS
invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.
◆ Current state
invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.
◆ Where it's heading
The pressure is toward being installable and auditable rather than more capable — install slimmed from roughly 100 MB to 56 MB, R CMD check warnings and notes resolved, sp moved to Suggests, a Darwin Core-aligned data dictionary added, and a Zenodo concept DOI with CITATION.cff, codemeta.json and .zenodo.json. The package moves in lockstep with its B-Cubed sibling dissmapr, tagged within minutes of each other at both 0.1.0 and 0.2.1, which points at project-level standards deadlines rather than independent release decisions. Trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration remain on the roadmap.
◆ Prediction
Standards compliance is now complete and the roadmap names functional trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration tools, so the next release is the first that can plausibly be about invasion ecology rather than packaging.
Alternatives to b3gbi and invasimapr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either b3gbi or invasimapr.
collinear
collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.
nert
nert put fourteen TERN datasets behind one dispatcher and called it stable.
scTypeEval
scTypeEval judges single-cell annotations without needing a ground truth to judge them against.
medrobust
medrobust made its partial-identification bounds usable by giving them confidence intervals.
probmed
probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.
See all b3gbi alternatives → · See all invasimapr alternatives →
Recent activity from b3gbi and invasimapr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4d agob3gbiJOSS review fixes: contributors, examples, tracked data
- 1mo agoinvasimaprVersion bump; notes identical to 0.2.0
- 1mo agob3gbiEEA grid coordinates no longer scaled by resolution
- 1mo agob3gbiadd_ci() no longer crashes on completeness indicators
- 1mo agoinvasimaprB-Cubed standards alignment; install slimmed to 56 MB
- 1mo agoinvasimaprinvasimapr v0.1.0: First citable release
- 1mo agob3gbiString taxon keys for GBIF's Catalogue of Life backbone
- 1mo agob3gbiUncertainty split out of the indicator workflow into add_ci() ⚡
- 1mo agob3gbiFAIR column mapping doc and Zenodo DOI badge
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between b3gbi and invasimapr?
Both compete on the same themes — biodiversity, r package — within Analytics. b3gbi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is b3gbi better than invasimapr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. b3gbi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to b3gbi?
Top b3gbi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "b3gbi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/b3gbi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to invasimapr?
Top invasimapr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "invasimapr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/invasimapr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.