soilDBdata
soilDBdata exists so soilDB's tests can run without a NASIS connection.
Comparison · Analytics
b3gbi vs clinify
A side-by-side editorial comparison of b3gbi and clinify — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r package
b3gbi vs clinify: at a glance
What is b3gbi?
b3gbi pulled confidence intervals out of its indicator workflow and handed them to dubicube.
b3gbi computes biodiversity indicators from GBIF occurrence cubes for the B-Cubed project, and sits at 0.9.4 in a JOSS review run-up. The 0.9 release decoupled uncertainty from indicator calculation: confidence intervals are no longer produced inline but added afterward with add_ci(), backed by whole-cube bootstrapping from the sibling dubicube package. Everything since has been grid-parsing and compatibility repair around that split.
What is clinify?
clinify is closing the gap between flextable defaults and regulatory table specs.
clinify shapes clinical trial tables into the Word deliverables regulatory submissions require, wrapping flextable and officer. Version 0.4.0 is on CRAN and is almost entirely typographic control: spanner rules that follow the header instead of hard-coded column numbers, header padding named for where the space actually sits, and explicit row pitch. The structural release was 0.3.0, which introduced document objects and broke three APIs to get there.
b3gbi vs clinify: editorial side-by-side
b3gbi
2.5ANALYTICS
b3gbi pulled confidence intervals out of its indicator workflow and handed them to dubicube.
◆ Current state
b3gbi computes biodiversity indicators from GBIF occurrence cubes for the B-Cubed project, and sits at 0.9.4 in a JOSS review run-up. The 0.9 release decoupled uncertainty from indicator calculation: confidence intervals are no longer produced inline but added afterward with add_ci(), backed by whole-cube bootstrapping from the sibling dubicube package. Everything since has been grid-parsing and compatibility repair around that split.
◆ Where it's heading
Two forces are shaping releases. Internally, the uncertainty split produced an indicator-specific rule book — species-level indicators bootstrap the whole cube, raw counts resample within year, evenness gets a logit transform — and that rule book is where the statistical thinking now lives. Externally, GBIF's taxonomic backbone migration to the Catalogue of Life forced string taxon keys through process_cube() and the plotting paths, while recurring EEA and MGRS grid-code fixes mark coordinate parsing as the least settled area.
◆ Prediction
The 0.9.4 notes are entirely JOSS review items — contributors, examples, tracked datasets — so the next release is most likely a JOSS-accepted 1.0 rather than new indicator work.
clinify
2.5ANALYTICS
clinify is closing the gap between flextable defaults and regulatory table specs.
◆ Current state
clinify shapes clinical trial tables into the Word deliverables regulatory submissions require, wrapping flextable and officer. Version 0.4.0 is on CRAN and is almost entirely typographic control: spanner rules that follow the header instead of hard-coded column numbers, header padding named for where the space actually sits, and explicit row pitch. The structural release was 0.3.0, which introduced document objects and broke three APIs to get there.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is working through the places where flextable's defaults and a statistical reporting spec disagree, and the notes are unusually explicit about why each default is wrong — a cell's bottom border draws below its bottom padding, so space under a header moves the rule rather than opening a gap beneath it; flextable leaves rows at a nominal quarter inch when the spec names an exact pitch. Each addition is built to survive an organisation's own clinify_table_default() rather than assuming clinify's styling runs last.
◆ Prediction
Header, spanner and row-pitch control all landed together, so the next gap in the same series is title and footnote geometry — the remaining page furniture that 0.3.0's two-part split left roughly specified.
Alternatives to b3gbi and clinify
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either b3gbi or clinify.
collinear
collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.
nert
nert put fourteen TERN datasets behind one dispatcher and called it stable.
scTypeEval
scTypeEval judges single-cell annotations without needing a ground truth to judge them against.
medrobust
medrobust made its partial-identification bounds usable by giving them confidence intervals.
probmed
probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.
See all b3gbi alternatives → · See all clinify alternatives →
Recent activity from b3gbi and clinify
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4d agob3gbiJOSS review fixes: contributors, examples, tracked data
- 15d agoclinifySpanner rules, header padding and exact row pitch
- 1mo agob3gbiEEA grid coordinates no longer scaled by resolution
- 1mo agob3gbiadd_ci() no longer crashes on completeness indicators
- 1mo agob3gbiString taxon keys for GBIF's Catalogue of Life backbone
- 1mo agob3gbiUncertainty split out of the indicator workflow into add_ci() ⚡
- 1mo agob3gbiFAIR column mapping doc and Zenodo DOI badge
- 1y agoclinifyDocument objects: clindoc() and multi-table output ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between b3gbi and clinify?
Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. b3gbi and clinify are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is b3gbi better than clinify?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. b3gbi and clinify are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to b3gbi?
Top b3gbi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "b3gbi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/b3gbi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to clinify?
Top clinify alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "clinify alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/clinify for the full list with editorial commentary on each.