← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

assesslite vs mmconvert

A side-by-side editorial comparison of assesslite and mmconvert — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

assesslite vs mmconvert: at a glance

Featureassesslitemmconvert
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescausal-inference, reproducibility, statistical-auditing, python-r-parityr-package, genetics, genome-build, reference-data
Last editorial update2h ago36m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is assesslite?

Four releases in fifteen hours take causal assumption-checking from resampling to identification

AssessLite attacks the structural assumptions behind a causal finding and returns three-way verdicts — stable, unstable, or not resolvable — feeding proceed, conditional or abstain decisions, with an auditable JSON record validated against a shared schema. It runs natively in R and Python against one spec, with the Python engine reproducing R's coxph(ties=breslow) exactly. The entire 0.1.0-through-0.4.0 arc landed inside a single day in July 2026.

Read the full assesslite trajectory →

What is mmconvert?

A single-purpose mouse map interpolator that solved its problem in 2023 and has coasted since

mmconvert does one thing: interpolate between GRCm39 physical positions and the revised Cox genetic map for mouse MUGA array markers. The substantive work all landed in a burst across 2021-2023 — the initial function, the GRCm39 annotation dataset, cross2_to_grcm39(), the recomputed Cox maps and their smoothed replacement. Everything since is upkeep: a warning-message fix in 0.12, and 0.14 is a test adjustment to silence a CRAN Note with no code change at all.

Read the full mmconvert trajectory →

assesslite vs mmconvert: editorial side-by-side

A
assesslite
ANALYTICS
0.0

Four releases in fifteen hours take causal assumption-checking from resampling to identification

◆ Current state

AssessLite attacks the structural assumptions behind a causal finding and returns three-way verdicts — stable, unstable, or not resolvable — feeding proceed, conditional or abstain decisions, with an auditable JSON record validated against a shared schema. It runs natively in R and Python against one spec, with the Python engine reproducing R's coxph(ties=breslow) exactly. The entire 0.1.0-through-0.4.0 arc landed inside a single day in July 2026.

◆ Where it's heading

The releases are cumulative, each restating the previous feature set and adding to it, so read them as one launch rather than four. The direction across that launch is clear: it started with resampling attacks (permutation, holdout, temporal split, subgroup), turned toward causal identification with declared DAGs and the backdoor criterion, then reached into genuinely dependent data with spatial and interference checks. The correctness work moves in step — the 0.3.0 Bonferroni adjustment fixed a holdout rule that was flagging roughly m times too often with m variants.

◆ Prediction

The project has repeatedly shipped what it previously listed as future work within days, so the next release most likely converts another declared gap rather than opening a new front.

M
mmconvert
ANALYTICS
0.0

A single-purpose mouse map interpolator that solved its problem in 2023 and has coasted since

◆ Current state

mmconvert does one thing: interpolate between GRCm39 physical positions and the revised Cox genetic map for mouse MUGA array markers. The substantive work all landed in a burst across 2021-2023 — the initial function, the GRCm39 annotation dataset, cross2_to_grcm39(), the recomputed Cox maps and their smoothed replacement. Everything since is upkeep: a warning-message fix in 0.12, and 0.14 is a test adjustment to silence a CRAN Note with no code change at all.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has reached the natural end state of a reference-data converter — the reference data stopped moving, so the package stopped moving. Releases now arrive roughly annually and exist to keep CRAN checks green. The 0.14 release shipped the same day as sibling qtl2convert 0.36, confirming these are batch maintenance passes across the maintainer's packages rather than independent development.

◆ Prediction

Without a new mouse genome build or a revised Cox map, the next release is likely another CRAN-check accommodation rather than new functionality.

Alternatives to assesslite and mmconvert

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either assesslite or mmconvert.

See all assesslite alternatives → · See all mmconvert alternatives →

Recent activity from assesslite and mmconvert

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agommconvertTest adjustment to clear a CRAN Note
  2. 1mo agoassessliteAssessLite 0.4.0
  3. 1mo agoassessliteAssessLite 0.3.0
  4. 1mo agoassessliteAssessLite 0.2.0
  5. 1mo agoassessliteAssessLite 0.1.0
  6. 1y agommconvertFixes a malformed warning message in mmconvert()
  7. 3y agommconvertOmits X chromosome positions for sex-averaged and male maps
  8. 3y agommconvertCRAN release adds chromosome lengths and smoothed Cox maps
  9. 3y agommconvertRecomputed Cox genetic maps and combined-array support
  10. 4y agommconvertRepoints data sources from master to main branches

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between assesslite and mmconvert?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. assesslite and mmconvert are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is assesslite better than mmconvert?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. assesslite and mmconvert are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to assesslite?

Top assesslite alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "assesslite alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/assesslite for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to mmconvert?

Top mmconvert alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mmconvert alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mmconvert for the full list with editorial commentary on each.