fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
assesslite vs detectseparation
A side-by-side editorial comparison of assesslite and detectseparation — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
assesslite vs detectseparation: at a glance
What is assesslite?
Four releases in fifteen hours take causal assumption-checking from resampling to identification
AssessLite attacks the structural assumptions behind a causal finding and returns three-way verdicts — stable, unstable, or not resolvable — feeding proceed, conditional or abstain decisions, with an auditable JSON record validated against a shared schema. It runs natively in R and Python against one spec, with the Python engine reproducing R's coxph(ties=breslow) exactly. The entire 0.1.0-through-0.4.0 arc landed inside a single day in July 2026.
What is detectseparation?
A diagnostic package that generalized past its own name, then learned to say which kind of separation it found
detectseparation identifies separation and infinite estimates in binomial-response GLMs — the condition where maximum likelihood estimates diverge and standard software reports large coefficients with enormous standard errors instead of an error. Version 0.3 was the structural turn: detect_infinite_estimates() became the general method covering log, logit, probit and cauchit links, with detect_separation() demoted to a wrapper around it. Version 0.4 in April 2026 adds the ability to distinguish complete from quasi-complete separation via separation_type.
assesslite vs detectseparation: editorial side-by-side
assesslite
0.0ANALYTICS
Four releases in fifteen hours take causal assumption-checking from resampling to identification
◆ Current state
AssessLite attacks the structural assumptions behind a causal finding and returns three-way verdicts — stable, unstable, or not resolvable — feeding proceed, conditional or abstain decisions, with an auditable JSON record validated against a shared schema. It runs natively in R and Python against one spec, with the Python engine reproducing R's coxph(ties=breslow) exactly. The entire 0.1.0-through-0.4.0 arc landed inside a single day in July 2026.
◆ Where it's heading
The releases are cumulative, each restating the previous feature set and adding to it, so read them as one launch rather than four. The direction across that launch is clear: it started with resampling attacks (permutation, holdout, temporal split, subgroup), turned toward causal identification with declared DAGs and the backdoor criterion, then reached into genuinely dependent data with spatial and interference checks. The correctness work moves in step — the 0.3.0 Bonferroni adjustment fixed a holdout rule that was flagging roughly m times too often with m variants.
◆ Prediction
The project has repeatedly shipped what it previously listed as future work within days, so the next release most likely converts another declared gap rather than opening a new front.
detectseparation
0.0ANALYTICS
A diagnostic package that generalized past its own name, then learned to say which kind of separation it found
◆ Current state
detectseparation identifies separation and infinite estimates in binomial-response GLMs — the condition where maximum likelihood estimates diverge and standard software reports large coefficients with enormous standard errors instead of an error. Version 0.3 was the structural turn: detect_infinite_estimates() became the general method covering log, logit, probit and cauchit links, with detect_separation() demoted to a wrapper around it. Version 0.4 in April 2026 adds the ability to distinguish complete from quasi-complete separation via separation_type.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has been generalizing steadily — first past its own framing, since separation is one case of infinite estimates rather than the whole problem, and now toward finer classification of what it detects. The distinction 0.4 adds is practically useful because complete and quasi-complete separation call for different responses. Release intervals are long, roughly two to four years, which fits a diagnostic tool whose underlying theory is settled.
◆ Prediction
With link coverage broad and separation now classified by type, further work is more likely to refine reporting than to extend detection to new model families.
Alternatives to assesslite and detectseparation
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either assesslite or detectseparation.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
See all assesslite alternatives → · See all detectseparation alternatives →
Recent activity from assesslite and detectseparation
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoassessliteAssessLite 0.4.0
- 1mo agoassessliteAssessLite 0.3.0
- 1mo agoassessliteAssessLite 0.2.0 ⚡
- 1mo agoassessliteAssessLite 0.1.0 ⚡
- 3mo agodetectseparationdetectseparation v0.4
- 3y agodetectseparationdetectseparation v0.3
- 5y agodetectseparationdetectseparation v0.2
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between assesslite and detectseparation?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. assesslite and detectseparation are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is assesslite better than detectseparation?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. assesslite and detectseparation are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to assesslite?
Top assesslite alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "assesslite alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/assesslite for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to detectseparation?
Top detectseparation alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "detectseparation alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/detectseparation for the full list with editorial commentary on each.