constants
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ArchR and qqman — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
ArchR returns after three years, mostly to catch up with the ecosystem around it.
ArchR analyses single-cell chromatin accessibility data, and until early 2025 its last release was from 2022. Release 1.0.3 collects roughly three years of accumulated pull requests: ggplot2 3.5 compatibility, Seurat v5 object creation, large-matrix handling via ARMA_64BIT_WORD, trajectory and module-score work, and a published Docker image. The release candidate before it did nothing but lift a 500 MB import ceiling.
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
qqman does two things: manhattan() and qq() plots for genome-wide association study results. Its six visible releases run from 2014 to a single 2017 packaging fix, and the last release with any user-facing change shipped in 2015. The archive is non-monotonic — a 0.0.0 tag published after 0.1.1 archives the pre-package standalone script — so version order and publication order disagree.
ArchR analyses single-cell chromatin accessibility data, and until early 2025 its last release was from 2022. Release 1.0.3 collects roughly three years of accumulated pull requests: ggplot2 3.5 compatibility, Seurat v5 object creation, large-matrix handling via ARMA_64BIT_WORD, trajectory and module-score work, and a published Docker image. The release candidate before it did nothing but lift a 500 MB import ceiling.
This is a maintenance restart rather than a new direction. The contributor list shifts visibly from the original authors toward newer maintainers handling compatibility work, and the Docker image suggests an acknowledgement that reproducing the environment had become the harder problem. Whether the cadence recovers is not something these entries answer.
The entries do not support a confident call on future direction; the immediate question is whether releases resume at a normal interval or 1.0.3 was a one-off catch-up.
qqman does two things: manhattan() and qq() plots for genome-wide association study results. Its six visible releases run from 2014 to a single 2017 packaging fix, and the last release with any user-facing change shipped in 2015. The archive is non-monotonic — a 0.0.0 tag published after 0.1.1 archives the pre-package standalone script — so version order and publication order disagree.
The real development window was 2014 to 2015. The 0.1.2 release did the substantive work, replacing the assumption that SNPs are evenly distributed across chromosomes and handing users control of axis limits, labels and log transformation; 0.1.3 then added annotation by p-value threshold and top-SNP-per-chromosome. After that the package stops. Notably, the archival 0.0.0 entry records that the original script had confidence intervals on QQ plots and richer highlighting than the released package ever regained.
With one packaging fix in the last decade, these entries support no prediction of further releases. The package reads as complete for its narrow purpose rather than abandoned mid-arc.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ArchR or qqman.
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
An MMRM tabulation package that has published nothing since its 2024 CRAN releases.
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — bioinformatics — within Analytics. ArchR and qqman are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ArchR and qqman are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top ArchR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ArchR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/archr-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top qqman alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qqman alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qqman-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.