qqman
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ArchR and tern.rbmi — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
ArchR returns after three years, mostly to catch up with the ecosystem around it.
ArchR analyses single-cell chromatin accessibility data, and until early 2025 its last release was from 2022. Release 1.0.3 collects roughly three years of accumulated pull requests: ggplot2 3.5 compatibility, Seurat v5 object creation, large-matrix handling via ARMA_64BIT_WORD, trajectory and module-score work, and a published Docker image. The release candidate before it did nothing but lift a 500 MB import ceiling.
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
tern.rbmi renders the output of {rbmi} reference-based multiple imputation analyses into tern tables for clinical reporting. Its three most recent releases exist to satisfy CRAN: restricting vignette builds to gcc, adding V8 to Suggests, and a plain resubmission. No user-facing functionality has changed in the visible window, and the three older entries now backfilled are version-bump automation.
ArchR analyses single-cell chromatin accessibility data, and until early 2025 its last release was from 2022. Release 1.0.3 collects roughly three years of accumulated pull requests: ggplot2 3.5 compatibility, Seurat v5 object creation, large-matrix handling via ARMA_64BIT_WORD, trajectory and module-score work, and a published Docker image. The release candidate before it did nothing but lift a 500 MB import ceiling.
This is a maintenance restart rather than a new direction. The contributor list shifts visibly from the original authors toward newer maintainers handling compatibility work, and the Docker image suggests an acknowledgement that reproducing the environment had become the harder problem. Whether the cadence recovers is not something these entries answer.
The entries do not support a confident call on future direction; the immediate question is whether releases resume at a normal interval or 1.0.3 was a one-off catch-up.
tern.rbmi renders the output of {rbmi} reference-based multiple imputation analyses into tern tables for clinical reporting. Its three most recent releases exist to satisfy CRAN: restricting vignette builds to gcc, adding V8 to Suggests, and a plain resubmission. No user-facing functionality has changed in the visible window, and the three older entries now backfilled are version-bump automation.
This is a thin adapter package and behaves like one — it moves when CRAN or an upstream dependency forces it to. Between 2022 and 2024 the feed shows only version bumps, and the 2025 releases are packaging concerns rather than analysis changes. The newly surfaced 2022 entries reinforce rather than change that reading.
Expect the next release to be triggered by a CRAN check failure or an {rbmi} update rather than by new tabulation features.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ArchR or tern.rbmi.
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
An MMRM tabulation package that has published nothing since its 2024 CRAN releases.
See all ArchR alternatives → · See all tern.rbmi alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ArchR and tern.rbmi are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ArchR and tern.rbmi are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top ArchR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ArchR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/archr-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top tern.rbmi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tern.rbmi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tern-rbmi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.