tidyr
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Apache Superset and modeltime — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Superset's feed tracks Helm chart tags, so the BI product itself stays invisible here.
Every entry in this feed is a Helm chart tag from the apache/superset repository, carrying no notes beyond a one-line project blurb. The chart has moved from 0.19.0 to 0.22.5 in about six weeks, a packaging cadence rather than an application one. Nothing here describes a change to Superset's dashboards, SQL Lab, or semantic layer.
modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.
modeltime is at 1.3.3, a single change making the package robust to xgboost version shifts. The feature weight sits in 1.3.2, which added a future-based parallel backend, the maape() accuracy metric and dials helpers for ADAM engine tuning, and further back in the 1.2.8 and 1.3.0 pair that introduced conformal prediction intervals and then carried them through the nested forecasting workflow.
Every entry in this feed is a Helm chart tag from the apache/superset repository, carrying no notes beyond a one-line project blurb. The chart has moved from 0.19.0 to 0.22.5 in about six weeks, a packaging cadence rather than an application one. Nothing here describes a change to Superset's dashboards, SQL Lab, or semantic layer.
The chart is being cut on a fast, small-increment schedule — five patches inside 0.22.x in under three weeks. That pattern usually reflects deployment plumbing being tuned against a moving upstream image rather than any single problem being chased. Until the crawl points at the release notes for Superset itself, this feed will keep reporting packaging motion and nothing about the product.
Expect continued 0.22.x patch tags at a similar pace, with a 0.23.0 chart bump likely when the next Superset application release lands. The entries themselves will stay note-free unless the project starts populating chart release bodies.
modeltime is at 1.3.3, a single change making the package robust to xgboost version shifts. The feature weight sits in 1.3.2, which added a future-based parallel backend, the maape() accuracy metric and dials helpers for ADAM engine tuning, and further back in the 1.2.8 and 1.3.0 pair that introduced conformal prediction intervals and then carried them through the nested forecasting workflow.
The arc runs from uncertainty quantification to execution. Conformal intervals arrived first and were then threaded through nested fitting, refitting and the printed forecast tables so users can see which confidence method produced an interval. The later work moves down a layer to how forecasts are computed — a portable future backend replacing foreach tuning — rather than what they express.
With only an xgboost compatibility fix since the 1.3.2 feature release, the entries do not support a confident prediction about what comes next beyond continued dependency maintenance.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Apache Superset or modeltime.
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.
CmdStanPy is clearing deprecations ahead of a 2.0 it keeps announcing.
DoWhy adds one estimation method a year and keeps its identification edge.
OpenHouse is hardening the seams where table policies and jobs quietly fail.
silx 3.0 moved its default Qt binding to PySide6 — a migration for everyone embedding it.
See all Apache Superset alternatives → · See all modeltime alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Apache Superset is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Apache Superset is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top Apache Superset alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Apache Superset alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/apache-superset for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top modeltime alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.