mice
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
anticlust vs selection.index
A side-by-side editorial comparison of anticlust and selection.index — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
anticlust vs selection.index: at a glance
What is anticlust?
Anticlustering keeps absorbing constraints — must-link, cannot-link, blocks, missing data
anticlust partitions a set of items into groups that are as similar to each other as possible — assembling matched stimulus sets, balanced experimental conditions, comparable teaching groups. The current surface is one function, anticlustering(), with a growing list of things it will honour: must-link and cannot-link constraints, categorical variables as factors, NAs, blocking by a categorical level, and a choice among exact solvers and heuristics.
What is selection.index?
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.
anticlust vs selection.index: editorial side-by-side
anticlust
0.0INFRA · APIS
Anticlustering keeps absorbing constraints — must-link, cannot-link, blocks, missing data
◆ Current state
anticlust partitions a set of items into groups that are as similar to each other as possible — assembling matched stimulus sets, balanced experimental conditions, comparable teaching groups. The current surface is one function, anticlustering(), with a growing list of things it will honour: must-link and cannot-link constraints, categorical variables as factors, NAs, blocking by a categorical level, and a choice among exact solvers and heuristics.
◆ Where it's heading
Two years of releases have gone almost entirely into constraint handling and input tolerance rather than new objectives. The methods list grew by absorbing outside work — the three-phase search of Yang et al. contributed by an external author, a 2PML heuristic for must-link problems, a Gurobi backend for the exact formulations. Meanwhile categories_to_binary() has been rewritten twice, which is where the recent bugs have come from.
◆ Prediction
The constraint types now interact combinatorially — blocks, must-link, cannot-link, missing values and each objective — and the last two releases were both regressions in the encoding layer underneath them. Consolidating that layer is the more likely next move than another solver.
selection.index
0.0INFRA · APIS
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
◆ Current state
selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.
◆ Where it's heading
The first version series added one function at a time — combinatorial indices, then genetic advance, then mean performance under randomised block designs — against a fixed phenotypic framing. Version 2.0.0 abandons that framing rather than extending it. Genomic and marker information become inputs the package understands, multi-cycle simulation becomes a built-in toolset, and the old combinatorial entry points are replaced by a named lpsi(). The 2.0.1 follow-up is entirely CI and numerical-stability work, which reads like a maintainer bracing a much larger surface.
◆ Prediction
A seventeen-runner CI matrix mirroring every CRAN check flavour, added days after 2.0.0, says the immediate concern is keeping a compiled multi-family package green rather than adding to it. Expect stabilisation releases before anything new.
Alternatives to anticlust and selection.index
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either anticlust or selection.index.
PINstimation
A market-microstructure toolkit that keeps adding estimators as the papers land.
nzilbb.vowels
A vowel-analysis package trimming dependencies after an email address got it archived.
emuR
The R half of the EMU speech database system, fixing what was quietly broken.
BAS
A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.
tidyplots
tidyplots keeps rebuilding its own foundations rather than layering around them.
See all anticlust alternatives → · See all selection.index alternatives →
Recent activity from anticlust and selection.index
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4mo agoanticlustOne-hot encoding regression from 0.8.13 reverted
- 5mo agoselection.indexCI expanded to 17 runners after the 2.0.0 rewrite
- 5mo agoselection.indexGenomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core ⚡
- 6mo agoselection.indexUnspecified general performance improvements
- 8mo agoanticlustblocks argument applies anticlustering level by level
- 9mo agoanticlustMissing values, factor columns, and the three-phase search
- 1y agoanticlustEdge cases in the previous release's cannot-link handling
- 1y agoanticlustVector cannot-link constraints skip the solver entirely
- 1y agoanticlustUncaught test error flagged by CRAN additional checks
- 2y agoselection.indexMean performance for randomised block designs
- 3y agoselection.indexsel.index() and sel.score.rank() removed for comb.indices()
- 4y agoselection.indexGenetic advance calculation added
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between anticlust and selection.index?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. anticlust and selection.index are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is anticlust better than selection.index?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. anticlust and selection.index are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to anticlust?
Top anticlust alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "anticlust alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/anticlust for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to selection.index?
Top selection.index alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "selection.index alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/selection-index for the full list with editorial commentary on each.