The D-score reference implementation rebuilt its measurement foundation on seven countries.
selection.index alternatives
The best selection.index alternatives in developer tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.
Updated Aug 20, 2026
Looking for the best alternatives to selection.index? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in developer tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, selection.index shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 0.0 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.
About selection.index
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.
Velocity 0.0 · Last update 48m ago
Top 12 alternatives to selection.index
Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.
A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.
A gene-set enrichment package that outgrew its human-only origins, then went quiet.
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it
CRAN download analytics maintained one micro-change at a time, hundreds per year
INSEE's statistics API gets a French R client that keeps meeting its edge cases
selection.index vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance
Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.
| Product | Velocity | Sparks · 30d | Focus areas | Latest release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| selection.index (baseline) | 0.0 | 0 | plant-breedingselection-indexgenomic-selection | Genomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core |
| dscore | 0.0 | 0 | child-developmentpsychometricsglobal-health | dscore 2.0.0 |
| ggfootball | 0.0 | 0 | sports-analyticsr-packagedata-scraping | ggfootball 0.3.0 |
| goat | 0.0 | 0 | bioinformaticsgene-set-analysisr-package | Gene sets beyond human, and analyses you can reload |
| rollupTree | 0.0 | 0 | recursive-computationtree-structuresdag | — |
| massProps | 0.0 | 0 | systems-engineeringmass-propertiesuncertainty-propagation | — |
| writeAlizer | 0.0 | 0 | writing-assessmentnlp-featuresmodel-artifacts | — |
| samplr | 0.0 | 0 | cognitive-sciencesampling-algorithmsmcmc | — |
| stochvol | 0.0 | 0 | bayesian-inferencestochastic-volatilitymcmc | — |
| midr | 0.0 | 0 | explainable-aisurrogate-modelsshapley | Matrix responses bring multi-class and survival models in scope |
| GeoThinneR | 0.0 | 0 | spatial-thinningspecies-distributionoccurrence-data | GeoThinned result objects and a reorganised method surface |
| packageRank | 0.0 | 0 | crandownload-analyticslog-filtering | — |
| melodi | 0.0 | 0 | official-statisticsapi-clientinsee | — |
The 12 best selection.index alternatives, in depth
1. dscore · velocity 0.0
The D-score reference implementation rebuilt its measurement foundation on seven countries.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “dscore 2.0.0”.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, dscore focuses on child development, psychometrics and global health.
dscore and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full dscore trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs dscore →
2. ggfootball · velocity 0.0
A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “ggfootball 0.3.0”.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, ggfootball focuses on sports analytics, r package and data scraping.
ggfootball and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full ggfootball trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs ggfootball →
3. goat · velocity 0.0
A gene-set enrichment package that outgrew its human-only origins, then went quiet.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Gene sets beyond human, and analyses you can reload”.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, goat focuses on bioinformatics, gene set analysis and r package.
goat and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
4. rollupTree · velocity 0.0
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, rollupTree focuses on recursive computation, tree structures and dag.
rollupTree and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full rollupTree trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs rollupTree →
5. massProps · velocity 0.0
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, massProps focuses on systems engineering, mass properties and uncertainty propagation.
massProps and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full massProps trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs massProps →
6. writeAlizer · velocity 0.0
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, writeAlizer focuses on writing assessment, nlp features and model artifacts.
writeAlizer and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full writeAlizer trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs writeAlizer →
7. samplr · velocity 0.0
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, samplr focuses on cognitive science, sampling algorithms and mcmc.
samplr and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full samplr trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs samplr →
8. stochvol · velocity 0.0
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, stochvol focuses on bayesian inference, stochastic volatility and mcmc.
stochvol and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full stochvol trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs stochvol →
9. midr · velocity 0.0
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Matrix responses bring multi-class and survival models in scope”.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, midr focuses on explainable ai, surrogate models and shapley.
midr and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
10. GeoThinneR · velocity 0.0
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “GeoThinned result objects and a reorganised method surface”.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, GeoThinneR focuses on spatial thinning, species distribution and occurrence data.
GeoThinneR and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full GeoThinneR trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs GeoThinneR →
11. packageRank · velocity 0.0
CRAN download analytics maintained one micro-change at a time, hundreds per year.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, packageRank focuses on cran, download analytics and log filtering.
packageRank and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full packageRank trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs packageRank →
12. melodi · velocity 0.0
INSEE's statistics API gets a French R client that keeps meeting its edge cases.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where selection.index leans on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection, melodi focuses on official statistics, api client and insee.
melodi and selection.index have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full melodi trajectory → · Compare selection.index vs melodi →
Frequently asked questions
What are the best alternatives to selection.index?
The top selection.index alternatives we currently track in developer tools are dscore, ggfootball, goat, rollupTree, massProps, ranked by recent ship velocity.
How is this list of selection.index alternatives ranked?
Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.
Can I compare selection.index directly with one of these alternatives?
Yes — every card has a "Compare with selection.index" link to a side-by-side /compare page.