The D-score reference implementation rebuilt its measurement foundation on seven countries.
anticlust alternatives
The best anticlust alternatives in developer tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.
Updated Aug 20, 2026
Looking for the best alternatives to anticlust? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in developer tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, anticlust shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 0.0 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.
About anticlust
Anticlustering keeps absorbing constraints — must-link, cannot-link, blocks, missing data
anticlust partitions a set of items into groups that are as similar to each other as possible — assembling matched stimulus sets, balanced experimental conditions, comparable teaching groups. The current surface is one function, anticlustering(), with a growing list of things it will honour: must-link and cannot-link constraints, categorical variables as factors, NAs, blocking by a categorical level, and a choice among exact solvers and heuristics.
Velocity 0.0 · Last update 51m ago
Top 12 alternatives to anticlust
Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.
A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.
A gene-set enrichment package that outgrew its human-only origins, then went quiet.
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
CRAN download analytics maintained one micro-change at a time, hundreds per year
anticlust vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance
Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.
| Product | Velocity | Sparks · 30d | Focus areas | Latest release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| anticlust (baseline) | 0.0 | 0 | anticlusteringexperimental-designconstraint-solving | — |
| dscore | 0.0 | 0 | child-developmentpsychometricsglobal-health | dscore 2.0.0 |
| ggfootball | 0.0 | 0 | sports-analyticsr-packagedata-scraping | ggfootball 0.3.0 |
| goat | 0.0 | 0 | bioinformaticsgene-set-analysisr-package | Gene sets beyond human, and analyses you can reload |
| rollupTree | 0.0 | 0 | recursive-computationtree-structuresdag | — |
| massProps | 0.0 | 0 | systems-engineeringmass-propertiesuncertainty-propagation | — |
| writeAlizer | 0.0 | 0 | writing-assessmentnlp-featuresmodel-artifacts | — |
| samplr | 0.0 | 0 | cognitive-sciencesampling-algorithmsmcmc | — |
| stochvol | 0.0 | 0 | bayesian-inferencestochastic-volatilitymcmc | — |
| midr | 0.0 | 0 | explainable-aisurrogate-modelsshapley | Matrix responses bring multi-class and survival models in scope |
| GeoThinneR | 0.0 | 0 | spatial-thinningspecies-distributionoccurrence-data | GeoThinned result objects and a reorganised method surface |
| selection.index | 0.0 | 0 | plant-breedingselection-indexgenomic-selection | Genomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core |
| packageRank | 0.0 | 0 | crandownload-analyticslog-filtering | — |
The 12 best anticlust alternatives, in depth
1. dscore · velocity 0.0
The D-score reference implementation rebuilt its measurement foundation on seven countries.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “dscore 2.0.0”.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, dscore focuses on child development, psychometrics and global health.
dscore and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
2. ggfootball · velocity 0.0
A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “ggfootball 0.3.0”.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, ggfootball focuses on sports analytics, r package and data scraping.
ggfootball and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full ggfootball trajectory → · Compare anticlust vs ggfootball →
3. goat · velocity 0.0
A gene-set enrichment package that outgrew its human-only origins, then went quiet.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Gene sets beyond human, and analyses you can reload”.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, goat focuses on bioinformatics, gene set analysis and r package.
goat and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
4. rollupTree · velocity 0.0
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, rollupTree focuses on recursive computation, tree structures and dag.
rollupTree and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full rollupTree trajectory → · Compare anticlust vs rollupTree →
5. massProps · velocity 0.0
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, massProps focuses on systems engineering, mass properties and uncertainty propagation.
massProps and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full massProps trajectory → · Compare anticlust vs massProps →
6. writeAlizer · velocity 0.0
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, writeAlizer focuses on writing assessment, nlp features and model artifacts.
writeAlizer and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full writeAlizer trajectory → · Compare anticlust vs writeAlizer →
7. samplr · velocity 0.0
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, samplr focuses on cognitive science, sampling algorithms and mcmc.
samplr and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
8. stochvol · velocity 0.0
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, stochvol focuses on bayesian inference, stochastic volatility and mcmc.
stochvol and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full stochvol trajectory → · Compare anticlust vs stochvol →
9. midr · velocity 0.0
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Matrix responses bring multi-class and survival models in scope”.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, midr focuses on explainable ai, surrogate models and shapley.
midr and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
10. GeoThinneR · velocity 0.0
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “GeoThinned result objects and a reorganised method surface”.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, GeoThinneR focuses on spatial thinning, species distribution and occurrence data.
GeoThinneR and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full GeoThinneR trajectory → · Compare anticlust vs GeoThinneR →
11. selection.index · velocity 0.0
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Genomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core”.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, selection.index focuses on plant breeding, selection index and genomic selection.
selection.index and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full selection.index trajectory → · Compare anticlust vs selection.index →
12. packageRank · velocity 0.0
CRAN download analytics maintained one micro-change at a time, hundreds per year.
Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where anticlust leans on anticlustering, experimental design and constraint solving, packageRank focuses on cran, download analytics and log filtering.
packageRank and anticlust have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full packageRank trajectory → · Compare anticlust vs packageRank →
Frequently asked questions
What are the best alternatives to anticlust?
The top anticlust alternatives we currently track in developer tools are dscore, ggfootball, goat, rollupTree, massProps, ranked by recent ship velocity.
How is this list of anticlust alternatives ranked?
Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.
Can I compare anticlust directly with one of these alternatives?
Yes — every card has a "Compare with anticlust" link to a side-by-side /compare page.