soilDBdata
soilDBdata exists so soilDB's tests can run without a NASIS connection.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of aniprocess and forecasting — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
aniprocess rebuilt its filter API into three tiers and removed the old one outright.
aniprocess is the signal-processing half of the animovement ecosystem for animal movement data — smoothing, outlier flagging and gap handling for tracking coordinates. Version 0.3.0 restructured the entire public interface into three tiers: bare functions over a vector or a frame of coordinate columns, *_with() to select a method by name, and *_across() to apply one to a whole aniframe. Two functions were removed rather than deprecated, and argument names were normalized across the package.
HIDDA.forecasting is a book chapter's reproducibility artifact, not a package under development.
HIDDA.forecasting accompanies a book chapter on forecasting infectious disease counts; its vignettes reproduce the results presented there using arima, prophet, glarma, hhh4contacts and scoringRules. The 1.0.0 release states this outright — it is the version used for the chapter, pinned to CRAN package versions as of July 2018. Every release since has been a vignette rebuild against newer R and dependency versions.
aniprocess is the signal-processing half of the animovement ecosystem for animal movement data — smoothing, outlier flagging and gap handling for tracking coordinates. Version 0.3.0 restructured the entire public interface into three tiers: bare functions over a vector or a frame of coordinate columns, *_with() to select a method by name, and *_across() to apply one to a whole aniframe. Two functions were removed rather than deprecated, and argument names were normalized across the package.
The redesign pushes aniframe metadata into the processing layer — *_across() reads sampling rate and the time column off the object instead of asking the caller, which is the division of labour aniframe's own class work assumes. Defaults are shifting toward not destroying information: filters preserve gaps unless inferring across them is the point, and a missing confidence score now warns rather than being read as a poor one. The bug fixes tell a consistent per-group story, with speed computed within each track so a step never forms across a track boundary.
With the across-style API landed and issue #29 (filter_by_pose) still open, the next release most likely extends the same three-tier pattern to pose data rather than adding more filters.
HIDDA.forecasting accompanies a book chapter on forecasting infectious disease counts; its vignettes reproduce the results presented there using arima, prophet, glarma, hhh4contacts and scoringRules. The 1.0.0 release states this outright — it is the version used for the chapter, pinned to CRAN package versions as of July 2018. Every release since has been a vignette rebuild against newer R and dependency versions.
The release pattern is maintenance on an eight-year cadence dictated entirely by the surrounding ecosystem: 1.1.1 rebuilt under R 4.0.4, 1.1.2 under R 4.3.2, 1.1.3 under R 4.6.1, each reporting whether the numbers moved. They mostly have not — the recurring note is minor numerical differences confined to the prophet forecasts in vignette('CHILI_prophet'). The only substantive change in the visible history is 1.1.0's methodological tidy-up of the scoring comparisons.
Nothing in these entries points to new functionality; the next release is most likely another vignette rebuild whenever a dependency change or a CRAN check failure forces one.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either aniprocess or forecasting.
soilDBdata exists so soilDB's tests can run without a NASIS connection.
collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.
nert put fourteen TERN datasets behind one dispatcher and called it stable.
scTypeEval judges single-cell annotations without needing a ground truth to judge them against.
medrobust made its partial-identification bounds usable by giving them confidence intervals.
probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.
See all aniprocess alternatives → · See all forecasting alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. aniprocess is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. aniprocess is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top aniprocess alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "aniprocess alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/aniprocess for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top forecasting alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forecasting alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forecasting for the full list with editorial commentary on each.