DEVOPS
GitHub makes Copilot code review an API-managed policy, and @GitHub in Slack and Teams goes GA.
Alternatives · team collaboration tools
CoScreen alternatives
The best CoScreen alternatives in team collaboration tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.
Updated Nov 10, 2026
Looking for the best alternatives to CoScreen? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in team collaboration tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, CoScreen shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 3.8 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.
About CoScreen
CoScreen ships its final build and declares End of Life after a year of quiet.
CoScreen just shipped V8.11.14, explicitly labeled its final software update, alongside an official End of Life announcement. The last real feature release was V8.10 in August 2025 (screen-region sharing plus macOS Tahoe support); the eleven months since produced nothing but this shutdown notice. The multiplayer, multi-window screen-sharing tool for remote teams is being retired rather than iterated.
Velocity 3.8 · Last update 4mo ago
Top 12 alternatives to CoScreen
Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.
COLLAB
Teable adds an MCP tool that queries records without SQL, under existing access controls.
COLLAB
Double's Ask Double now sets up allocations and remembers how a firm codes vendors.
DEVOPS
GitLab sells Orbit as the evidence layer for agent pilots and AI-code rules.
COLLAB
Hive's iOS app gets a customizable tab bar, and Buzz snippet errors link to their code line.
COLLAB
Dropbox turns its fall launch into an agent push, with DBX Agent Cloud for developers.
COLLAB
Mattermost v12 adds device and channel attributes to its access policies.
PM
Asana gives client portal activity its own Inbox tab, a week after launching Tables.
COLLAB
NetNewsWire 7.3 hands timeline layout and feed media to user settings.
COLLAB
LibrePhotos 1.6 redesigns the app and admits its Docker images sent usage data to Microsoft.
COLLAB
Radarr's 7.0 pre-release line now shows every audio and subtitle stream per file.
COLLAB
Interact opens its intranet to outside AI assistants and uses Claude to attack its own platform.
CoScreen vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance
Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.
| Product | Velocity | Sparks · 30d | Focus areas | Latest release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoScreen (baseline) | 3.8 | 0 | end-of-lifescreen-sharingcollaboration | V8.11.14 Final Software Update |
| GitHub | 10.0 | 0 | copilotcode-reviewusage-metrics | — |
| Teable | 8.8 | 0 | no-code-databasemcpai-agents | — |
| Double | 7.5 | 2 | ai-agentsaccountingmonth-end close | Autoclose: AI agents run the month-end close, $500/month add-on |
| GitLab | 6.3 | 1 | knowledge graphai agentsai governance | GitLab Orbit is GA: Higher agent accuracy, lower token cost |
| Hive | 6.3 | 0 | project managementdashboardsbuzz ai | — |
| Dropbox | 6.3 | 1 | ai-agentsagent-infrastructureproject-context | Dropbox's next chapter: moving your work forward with AI in Dropbox |
| Mattermost | 6.3 | 1 | ai agentsaccess controlzero trust | Mattermost v12: Agents Are Doing the Work. Now Control What They Can See. |
| Asana | 6.3 | 1 | work-managementstructured-dataclient-portals | Introducing: Tables |
| NetNewsWire | 5.0 | 0 | rssiosmac | — |
| LibrePhotos | 5.0 | 0 | self-hostedphoto-managementsharing | — |
| Radarr | 5.0 | 0 | media-managementmedia-infopre-release | — |
| Interact | 5.0 | 0 | intranetmcpagentic-ai | — |
The 12 best CoScreen alternatives, in depth
1. GitHub · velocity 10.0
GitHub makes Copilot code review an API-managed policy, and @GitHub in Slack and Teams goes GA.
Its velocity score of 10.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, GitHub focuses on copilot, code review and usage metrics.
GitHub and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
2. Teable · velocity 8.8
Teable adds an MCP tool that queries records without SQL, under existing access controls.
Its velocity score of 8.8/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Teable focuses on no code database, mcp and ai agents.
Teable and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
3. Double · velocity 7.5
Double's Ask Double now sets up allocations and remembers how a firm codes vendors.
Over the last 30 days Double shipped 2 meaningful updates vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “Autoclose: AI agents run the month-end close, $500/month add-on”. Its velocity score of 7.5/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Double focuses on ai agents, accounting and month end close.
Over the last 30 days Double has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
4. GitLab · velocity 6.3
GitLab sells Orbit as the evidence layer for agent pilots and AI-code rules.
Over the last 30 days GitLab shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “GitLab Orbit is GA: Higher agent accuracy, lower token cost”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, GitLab focuses on knowledge graph, ai agents and ai governance.
Over the last 30 days GitLab has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
5. Hive · velocity 6.3
Hive's iOS app gets a customizable tab bar, and Buzz snippet errors link to their code line.
Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Hive focuses on project management, dashboards and buzz ai.
Hive and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
6. Dropbox · velocity 6.3
Dropbox turns its fall launch into an agent push, with DBX Agent Cloud for developers.
Over the last 30 days Dropbox shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “Dropbox's next chapter: moving your work forward with AI in Dropbox”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Dropbox focuses on ai agents, agent infrastructure and project context.
Over the last 30 days Dropbox has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
7. Mattermost · velocity 6.3
Mattermost v12 adds device and channel attributes to its access policies.
Over the last 30 days Mattermost shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “Mattermost v12: Agents Are Doing the Work. Now Control What They Can See.”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Mattermost focuses on ai agents, access control and zero trust.
Over the last 30 days Mattermost has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full Mattermost trajectory → · Compare CoScreen vs Mattermost →
8. Asana · velocity 6.3
Asana gives client portal activity its own Inbox tab, a week after launching Tables.
Over the last 30 days Asana shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “Introducing: Tables”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Asana focuses on work management, structured data and client portals.
Over the last 30 days Asana has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
9. NetNewsWire · velocity 5.0
NetNewsWire 7.3 hands timeline layout and feed media to user settings.
Its velocity score of 5.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, NetNewsWire focuses on rss, ios and mac.
NetNewsWire and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full NetNewsWire trajectory → · Compare CoScreen vs NetNewsWire →
10. LibrePhotos · velocity 5.0
LibrePhotos 1.6 redesigns the app and admits its Docker images sent usage data to Microsoft.
Its velocity score of 5.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, LibrePhotos focuses on self hosted, photo management and sharing.
LibrePhotos and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full LibrePhotos trajectory → · Compare CoScreen vs LibrePhotos →
11. Radarr · velocity 5.0
Radarr's 7.0 pre-release line now shows every audio and subtitle stream per file.
Its velocity score of 5.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Radarr focuses on media management, media info and pre release.
Radarr and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
12. Interact · velocity 5.0
Interact opens its intranet to outside AI assistants and uses Claude to attack its own platform.
Its velocity score of 5.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Interact focuses on intranet, mcp and agentic ai.
Interact and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Frequently asked questions
What are the best alternatives to CoScreen?
The top CoScreen alternatives we currently track in team collaboration tools are GitHub, Teable, Double, GitLab, Hive, ranked by recent ship velocity.
How is this list of CoScreen alternatives ranked?
Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.
Can I compare CoScreen directly with one of these alternatives?
Yes — every card has a "Compare with CoScreen" link to a side-by-side /compare page.