DEVOPS
Copilot's model roster churns weekly while GitHub quietly rewires policy and billing plumbing
Alternatives · team collaboration tools
CoScreen alternatives
The best CoScreen alternatives in team collaboration tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.
Updated Aug 12, 2026
Looking for the best alternatives to CoScreen? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in team collaboration tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, CoScreen shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 3.8 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.
About CoScreen
CoScreen ships its final build and declares End of Life after a year of quiet.
CoScreen just shipped V8.11.14, explicitly labeled its final software update, alongside an official End of Life announcement. The last real feature release was V8.10 in August 2025 (screen-region sharing plus macOS Tahoe support); the eleven months since produced nothing but this shutdown notice. The multiplayer, multi-window screen-sharing tool for remote teams is being retired rather than iterated.
Velocity 3.8 · Last update 1mo ago
Top 12 alternatives to CoScreen
Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.
COLLAB
Governance and cross-workspace plumbing, not new AI surface
PM
Asana is bolting an agent layer and a docs surface onto work management.
COLLAB
Double is moving the whole bookkeeping workflow into a chat assistant, one billable task per week.
COLLAB
A nightly canary train where the AI platform work hides between dependency bumps
COLLAB
SiYuan's v3.8.0 train restates one AI feature set across seven consecutive builds.
COLLAB
Simpplr turns recognition into spendable rewards, closing the loop inside its own platform.
COLLAB
After two years of quiet fixes, Komga puts a whole new web UI in front of users.
COLLAB
Document360 rebuilds its public API and turns docs into an agent-readable surface.
PM
Notion is building the place where other companies' agents come to work
COLLAB
Rocket.Chat's 8.7 release train is six candidates deep with almost nothing user-facing in them.
COLLAB
Teable is spending this release cycle making computed fields and admin recovery trustworthy
CoScreen vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance
Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.
| Product | Velocity | Sparks · 30d | Focus areas | Latest release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoScreen (baseline) | 3.8 | 0 | end-of-lifescreen-sharingcollaboration | V8.11.14 Final Software Update |
| GitHub | 10.0 | 1 | copilotmodel-catalogrulesets | Copilot memory and Ollama in GitHub Copilot for JetBrains |
| Hive | 10.0 | 0 | approvalsjira-syncresourcing | — |
| Asana | 8.8 | 2 | ai-teammatesautomationcollaborative-docs | ✨📄 Introducing Pages! (formerly known as Notes) |
| Double | 7.5 | 1 | bookkeeping-automationagent-nativemcp | Ask Double reaches Slack, Notion and CRM data in private beta |
| AFFiNE | 6.3 | 1 | byokcopilotcanary-train | Workspace BYOK profiles with model catalogs and key rotation |
| SiYuan | 6.3 | 0 | note-takingai-agentmcp | — |
| Simpplr | 6.3 | 1 | employee-experiencerecognitioninternal-comms | Simpplr’s Rewards Store evolution: built into the everyday employee experience — not bolted on |
| Komga | 6.3 | 1 | frontend-rewritebetaself-hosted | Komga 1.26.0 ships NextUI, a rewritten web interface, in beta |
| Document360 | 6.3 | 1 | apioauthmcp | API v3 rebuild adds OAuth 2.0 and scoped API keys |
| Notion | 6.3 | 1 | agentsdeveloper-platformworkers | AI Meeting Notes can now trigger Custom Agents |
| Rocket.Chat | 6.3 | 0 | release-candidatesstabilizationopen-source-chat | — |
| Teable | 5.0 | 0 | computed-fieldsbyodbadmin-tooling | — |
The 12 best CoScreen alternatives, in depth
1. GitHub · velocity 10.0
Copilot's model roster churns weekly while GitHub quietly rewires policy and billing plumbing.
Over the last 30 days GitHub shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “Copilot memory and Ollama in GitHub Copilot for JetBrains”. Its velocity score of 10.0/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, GitHub focuses on copilot, model catalog and rulesets.
Over the last 30 days GitHub has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
2. Hive · velocity 10.0
Governance and cross-workspace plumbing, not new AI surface.
Its velocity score of 10.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Hive focuses on approvals, jira sync and resourcing.
Hive and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
3. Asana · velocity 8.8
Asana is bolting an agent layer and a docs surface onto work management.
Over the last 30 days Asana shipped 2 meaningful updates vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “✨📄 Introducing Pages! (formerly known as Notes)”. Its velocity score of 8.8/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Asana focuses on ai teammates, automation and collaborative docs.
Over the last 30 days Asana has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
4. Double · velocity 7.5
Double is moving the whole bookkeeping workflow into a chat assistant, one billable task per week.
Over the last 30 days Double shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “Ask Double reaches Slack, Notion and CRM data in private beta”. Its velocity score of 7.5/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Double focuses on bookkeeping automation, agent native and mcp.
Over the last 30 days Double has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
5. AFFiNE · velocity 6.3
A nightly canary train where the AI platform work hides between dependency bumps.
Over the last 30 days AFFiNE shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “Workspace BYOK profiles with model catalogs and key rotation”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, AFFiNE focuses on byok, copilot and canary train.
Over the last 30 days AFFiNE has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
6. SiYuan · velocity 6.3
SiYuan's v3.8.0 train restates one AI feature set across seven consecutive builds.
Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, SiYuan focuses on note taking, ai agent and mcp.
SiYuan and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
7. Simpplr · velocity 6.3
Simpplr turns recognition into spendable rewards, closing the loop inside its own platform.
Over the last 30 days Simpplr shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “Simpplr’s Rewards Store evolution: built into the everyday employee experience — not bolted on”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Simpplr focuses on employee experience, recognition and internal comms.
Over the last 30 days Simpplr has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
8. Komga · velocity 6.3
After two years of quiet fixes, Komga puts a whole new web UI in front of users.
Over the last 30 days Komga shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “Komga 1.26.0 ships NextUI, a rewritten web interface, in beta”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Komga focuses on frontend rewrite, beta and self hosted.
Over the last 30 days Komga has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
9. Document360 · velocity 6.3
Document360 rebuilds its public API and turns docs into an agent-readable surface.
Over the last 30 days Document360 shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “API v3 rebuild adds OAuth 2.0 and scoped API keys”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Document360 focuses on api, oauth and mcp.
Over the last 30 days Document360 has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full Document360 trajectory → · Compare CoScreen vs Document360 →
10. Notion · velocity 6.3
Notion is building the place where other companies' agents come to work.
Over the last 30 days Notion shipped 1 meaningful update vs CoScreen's 0, most recently “AI Meeting Notes can now trigger Custom Agents”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Notion focuses on agents, developer platform and workers.
Over the last 30 days Notion has been shipping faster than CoScreen — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
11. Rocket.Chat · velocity 6.3
Rocket.Chat's 8.7 release train is six candidates deep with almost nothing user-facing in them.
Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Rocket.Chat focuses on release candidates, stabilization and open source chat.
Rocket.Chat and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full Rocket.Chat trajectory → · Compare CoScreen vs Rocket.Chat →
12. Teable · velocity 5.0
Teable is spending this release cycle making computed fields and admin recovery trustworthy.
Its velocity score of 5.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where CoScreen leans on end of life, screen sharing and collaboration, Teable focuses on computed fields, byodb and admin tooling.
Teable and CoScreen have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Frequently asked questions
What are the best alternatives to CoScreen?
The top CoScreen alternatives we currently track in team collaboration tools are GitHub, Hive, Asana, Double, AFFiNE, ranked by recent ship velocity.
How is this list of CoScreen alternatives ranked?
Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.
Can I compare CoScreen directly with one of these alternatives?
Yes — every card has a "Compare with CoScreen" link to a side-by-side /compare page.